All Laws Must Comply With the Constitution or They Are Void

AIM4Truther Mike N. wants all patriots to be aware of this information about the courts and constitution. We have included his entire note to us so that no details are missed:

.

In today’s (3/26/18) “My Bad” video/audio with Thomas, you stated that, “They’ve taken away all our Constitutional rights in these things [the agreements so vast they know we’re not going to read them].” 

I don’t know if you’ve looked at the 8-page document I emailed to you a few weeks ago entitled, Non-authority of the Feds, which you said you passed on to the Conclave.  So, I’ve attached another copy of it which I hope you will go through.

I doubt that any lawyers on your teams will agree with what I’m presenting to you, but they’re B.A.R. members and would be ostracized for straying from official and accepted doctrine.

First of all, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in several different decisions from the past that Congress has no exclusive jurisdiction over us unless we live in Washington, D.C., federally-owned lands, buildings, forts, etc., and the U.S. territories. FEDERAL STATUTES and REGULATIONS have no lawful applicability and effect on the citizens of the states.  In fact, the U.S. Constitution has no effect on us, either, unless we’ve sworn and subscribed an oath of allegiance to it.

Of course, all those employed in the 3 branches of government have (purportedly) sworn that oath and are bound by it.  The ONLY power/authority/jurisdiction that the Constitution gives to the federal government is enumerated in Article 1, Section 8 – the Congress to enact legislation in pursuance of those enumerated responsibilities, the President to execute that legislation, and the judiciary to arbitrate disagreements that arise over those responsibilities.

It’s all a ruse.  There are no courts of law anymore – merely administrative courts that have no lawful power to prosecute and punish.  The U.S. Supreme Court was put in place only to arbitrate disagreements between states and to serve as the ultimate appeals court.  Decisions made by the U.S. Supreme Court have applicability and effect ONLY upon the two litigants in a case – the plaintiff and the defendant – NOT the whole stinkin’ country!

For example, federal courts (including SCOTUS) had zero jurisdiction to hear Roe v. Wade.  The final LAWFUL decision was that of the Texas Supreme Court.  But, let’s say that SCOTUS did have the lawful jurisdiction to decide this case.  Jane Roe (Norma McCorvey, who later devoted her life to fighting abortion)and Henry Wade (Dallas County, Texas, District Attorney) were the ONLY entities affected by it.  SCOTUS said that Norma McCorvey could kill her unborn baby with impunity – NOT EVERY OTHER WOMAN IN AMERICA!

The only reason we’ve gotten so far off course is that the American people have become too complacent, indoctrinated, brainwashed and cowardly to collectively tell the federal bureaucracy to go screw itself.  This is where I’m hoping A.I.M. comes in.  I’ve written to many other websites in the past admonishing them to “unbrainwash” and “unindoctrinate” the people out of their ignorance by being as vigorous in telling we, the people how much power and authority WE have over the boogeyman as they are in repeatedly reminding us that the boogeyman exists and what he’s going to do to us.  I’ve received only one response to my many admonishments over the years and it was very nasty (Steve Quayle).

I have done four exorcisms over the years, Betsy, and they weren’t nearly as arduous as the ones in which written religious rituals are used, such as those portrayed in the movies.  I have been amazed, actually, at how quickly demons flee once they’re shown that you have the power of Jesus Christ within you and you are the boss there.  I hope I’m never called upon to do another because there’s gigundous emotional exhaustion afterwards.  And then, the Church doesn’t even want to hear the truth about supernatural realities (of which the Bible is full).  You know as well as I do that it all boils down to a “spiritual” battle we’re in.

If you think that telling your followers the truth about the federal government’s lack of authority over us is too much for them to handle, then at least keep posting the below quotes from SCOTUS.

 

ALL LAWS MUST COMPLY WITH THE CONSTITUTION OR THEY ARE VOID!!

(ALL EMBOLDENING, ENLARGING, ITALICIZATION, UNDERLINING ADDED)

.

“A law repugnant to the Constitution is void.  An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law.  The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” –Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

        “An unconstitutional law is void and is as no law.  An offense created by it is not crime.  A conviction under it is not merely erroneous but isillegal and void and cannot be used as a legal cause of imprisonment.” – Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879)

        “An unconstitutional act is not law.  It confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office.  It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” – Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” –Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

        “The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:  The general rule is that an unconstitutional statutethough having the form and name of lawis in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” – 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 177

        “No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it.  The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.  AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW, in legal contemplation, IS AS INOPERATIVE AS IF IT HAD NEVER BEEN PASSED. – 16 American Jurisprudence 2d, Sec. 256

4 thoughts on “All Laws Must Comply With the Constitution or They Are Void”

  1. 216,362 inmates in Federal Prisons across the US. Surely they all were not residents of DC. Not that I doubt what you are stating Constitutionally, however the people who initiate force for the Federal Government believe in the Federal Government’s power.
    As evidenced in the Bundy trials, any deliberation of the constitution was not allowed, at one point the audience wasn’t allowed to bring copies of the constitution into the courtrooms. I’m unsure just identifying or exposing this will make any difference for many have known and tried to argue it in courts to no avail. Plan B?

    Like

    1. From my research I believe you are almost correct, however the key is in the illegally done Reconstruction Acts after the civil war that is when the govt incorporated meaning they privatized, it wasn’t long after that a case before the supreme court I believe 1871 or something like that they ruled a “Corporation” for is a person regarding right to privacy and unlawful search and seizure, then of course you had the federal reserve act of 1913 putting direct taxes on all forms of income etc, several rulings by the supreme court over the next 15 years ruling was the 16th amendment did not give congress no new taxing authority so that is why I believe the bankers crashed the market in 1929 then in 1933 when everyone is beat up, tired and run down trying to survive, the mafia gangster heroes saved the day with the new deal crap and in 1938 we changed the whole system from operating on public law to now public policy and hence the UCC the laws of admiralty and maritime took over and everything is done by contracts, which is the straw man trust created when you became a ward of the state at birth, and it has been nothing but lies corruption money power since. The S.E.S was formed in 1978 or 1979 civil service reform act however it all started with the reconstruction acts which is all totally unconstitutional, was a blatant outright crime of treason, but I remember a couple years ago reading about something with the president and the acts and knew the president would appeal and knew the supreme court would throw all the acts out so they took it out of the hands of judicial review, another blatant outright crime of treason and usurping power, thats about what I know so far.
      As far as inconsistent rulings in the courts its because the Office of General Council reviews every court case and litigation, if they lost in court they change the rules in the policies and procedures regarding legal opinions and decisions, thats a fact, go to the GAO website look up legal resources or office of general council and look at the latest 2015 edition, it will blow your mind when you read whats in there and as you go through that you will see, they give you case rulings, 3 different decisions yet cases alike so they change the rules to give a meaning more broad and addressing the issues, they threw out any past practice etc they go by all recent rulings that favor what they need at the time and thats how they write up the rules. Also you will find in there how the supreme court basically discusses cases with lawmakers or advise them how laws should be written so as to have no legal problems, real independent right? Its all a big fraudulent corrupt lie and every one of them in DC is a part of it because they continue to do nothing to correct it even though they can, its bad, real bad now the eyes should be opening and it all makes sense. They play the constitution thing if they need it, they threw it out really so they tried to combine lawful and private govt to push the agenda because they won’t tell you about any of the fraud they continue to commit on every person in the country or they know the people will be pretty pissed off and they would get strung up

      Liked by 1 person

      1. No doubt that you have the facts. When USA became a Corporation they conscripted the States, City’s and local governments to also become corporations by issuing contracts between the two parties. As you can find on Dunn and Bradstreet a list of all corporations only very few counties are not. Most Contracts were a promise of favors, monetary and conditional. IE. USA Corp will give you this sum of money in return they had to agree to the conditions of the contract for accepting the monies. All transactions now are Corporate and in most cases anyone contracting with Government must be incorporated. Again following the rules and regulations of contract law. So in essence the usurpers have turned everything and everyone into corporations by slight of hand. As evidenced by the recent Mountain Man video, he was unable to argue his case of not being a freeman and asking the court to prove jurisdiction over him, they jailed him and proceeded to convict him in absetntism, without representation

        Like

  2. Although everything is correct, unbrainwashing is very difficult. Propaganda can’t be undone with reason; that said, even if the truth movement were to do everything right regarding unbrainwashing, the truth movement can’t overcome fluoridated water, toxic food additives and food preparation methods and geoengineering, which, IMO, is dumbing down the population to the point where the majority of the population lost all ability to engage their pre-frontal cortex – the main gating to diffuse behavior driven by emotion (the hate left).

    Unless the current generation of young millennials (< 18 yo) rebel against their socialist indoctrination, I don't think anything will work to bring the country back. I do see positive signs of this as many of them are fighting back, and even running for local offices.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s