Category: US Politics

Sen. Dianne Feinstein Behind Foreign Interference in U.S. Elections

Absolute Video Proof

Spread the word

Dianne Feinstein AVID


Listen to the audio first so that you can hear what the researchers found and can see why the information below is relevant. Dianne Feinstein Behind Foreign Interference in U S Elections


Feinstein owns controlling interest in AVID “election management” MSM teleprompter control system


Her 20-year Chinese spy staffer evidently used sensitive Senate intelligence to brainwash the American public via AVID ISIS LeaderPlus


(AUG. 15, 2018)—On Jul. 27, 2018, even left-leaning POLITICO could not ignore this corruption. They disclosed that Sen. Diane Feinstein (CA) had Chinese spies working for her while she oversaw the powerful Senate Judiciary and Intelligence committees, as well as the Democratic Party. Her staffers refused to provide substantive comment.

Sen. Feinstein’s financial disclosure clearly show that she holds a greater than 10% financial interest in AVID Technology. Avid supplies the newsroom management software names LeaderPlus used widely around the world.

Bookmark: #feinstein-avid-ownership |

10 percent ownership
Fig. 2—Sen. Diane G.B. Feinstein and her husband, venture capitalist Richard C. Blum, hold more than 10% of the stock in AVID Technology, Inc. Such a large holding in a public company gives them effective control of the company since no move would be made by the board of directors without consulting with such a large shareholder. See the Feinstein/2016 Financial Disclosure.
Lord Mark Malloch-Brown owns Investec 1 Limited. One of the 377 Investec 1 subsidiaries is ISIS Management Company Ltd. ISIS financed a project at Avid corporation, maker of TV and radio production equipment, called the Avid ISIS Client Guide and the Avid LeaderPlus Election Night Headache Relief. This system enables Malloch-Brown, Romney, Soros and the Senior Executive Service (SES) to push out a common propaganda narrative to control “perception management” on election night. Perception management is a Deep State shadow government mind control term for brain washing. It enables them to trigger their unthinking minions with emotional memes and programmed response triggers. For example: RACIST! MYSOGNINIST! NAZI! WHITE SUPREMACIST! HOMOPHOBIC! BITTER CLINGER! XENOPHOBIC PUTIN-LOVER! MUSLIM-HATER! DEPLORABLE! MEXICAN-HATER! IMPEACH TRUMP! WE LIE BECAUSE WE LOVE YOU! . . . and now PEDO-PHOBE! BOY-MAN LOVE HATER! . . ad nauseam. It is now quite evident that these globalists are intent on ripping apart America’s Judeo-Christian moral heritage and the Constitution.

British Privy Counselor Lord Mark Malloch-Brown is a director of Investec Plc which has over 400 subsidiaries spread around the world. One of those companies is ISIS Management Limited. ISIS developed the AVID ISIS System for pushing video files used in newsrooms.

AVID LeaderPlus and AVID ISIS together give Feinstein and Malloch-Brown the ability to push censored news and false stories to all subscribed newsrooms at the same time. The LeaderPlus product specializes in pushing election night stories right to a news reader’s teleprompter. They don’t even have to think. They just read whatever Feinstein and Malloch-Brown want.

On Sep. 26, 2009, Hillary Clinton and her U.S. State Department started secretly paying Facebook for a “template for election winning.” On Nov. 01, 2016, Hillary, Obama, John Podesta and Robby Mook took a $1.5 billion donation from Google’s Eric Schmidt to implement the U.S. Digital Service run out of the White House.

The software being used by these corruptocrats is Columbus-based innovator Leader Technologies’ invention of social networking that was stolen by their patent attorney, James P. Chandler, III (a Feinstein advisor), and given to the IBM Eclipse Foundation (formed Nov. 29, 2001) for distribution to Silicon Valley companies weaponized by the rogue C.I.A. for mass surveillance and private money-making for the C.I.A. outside the oversight of Congress. Readers should also note that AVID’s “LeaderPlus” product name likely violates Leader Technologies’ trademarks as well. See the Crimeline for more proof of the theft of social networking.

Here is a diagram of the “Internet of Things” election rigging system financed and controlled by Sen. Dianne G.B. Feinstein and her corruptocrat co-conspirators:

Bookmark: #how-msm-brainwashing-happens |

Global CIA
Fig. 3—Rogue C.I.A.’s global brain washing “template for winning elections” funded by Sen. Diane G.B. Feinstein, George Soros, Hillary Clinton, Mitt Romney, Lord Mark-Malloch Brown and Sir Geoffrey Pattie. 
Anonymous Patriots. (Aug. 15, 2018). C.I.A. MSM Brainwashing System. Americans for Innovation.

Criminal actions by either foreign nationals or affiliated U.S. citizens aimed at influencing U.S. elections would be subject to prosecution under various U.S. statutes.

The Logan Act, for instance, bars any U.S. citizen from interacting with a foreign government to influence policy. But many experts believe this law is overly broad, and there have been no successful prosecutions in its near 220 years. And while the term “collusion” is cited in the context of Russian interference in the 2016 election, collusion itself is only prohibited in the antitrust law arena. For more, see Dan Abrams’ Law & Crime.

Abrams writes: “Six years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a decision by a U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., that Congress can ban individuals who lawfully reside in the U.S. and are neither U.S. citizens nor ‘permanent residents’ from making donations or gifts related to any election. In that case, Bluman v. Federal Election Commission, a three-judge panel said the limitation was a legitimate tool for government to prevent ‘foreign influence over U.S. elections.'”

If it is illegal to donate to money to interfere in U.S. elections, then having investments in companies that build software to interfere in our elections is worse.

Bookmark: #avid-leaderplus-proof |


Local News Anchors Forced Into Reading The Same Script





Brainwashing crew.JPG

Senator Feinstein is privy to our nation’s most top secrets in her memberships on the Senate Judiciary and Intelligence committees. She and her husband Richard C. Blum have clearly been trading on that information to make her the second richest Senator in Congress at $94 million.

Sen. Feinstein’s collaboration with Privy Counselors Lord Mark Malloch-Brown and Sir Geoffrey Pattie in global MSM brainwashing technology appears to push her over the line into criminality and treason.

Bookmark: #avid-leaderplus |





Ban all electronic voting machines NOW

Fig. 4—Ban all electronic voting machines NOW. Lord Mark Malloch Brown owns Investec 1 Limited. One of the 377 Investec 1 subsidiaries is ISIS Management Company Ltd. ISIS financed a project at Avid corporation, maker of TV and radio production equipment, called the Avid ISIS Client Guide and the Avid LeaderPlus Election Night Headache Relief. This system enables Malloch-Brown, Romney, Soros and the Senior Executive Service (SES) to push out a common propaganda narrative to control “perception management” on election night. Perception management is a Deep State shadow government mind control term for brain washing. It enables them to trigger their unthinking minions with emotional memes and programmed response triggers. For example: RACIST! MYSOGNINIST! NAZI! WHITE SUPREMACIST! HOMOPHOBIC! BITTER CLINGER! XENOPHOBIC PUTIN-LOVER! MUSLIM-HATER! DEPLORABLE! MEXICAN-HATER! IMPEACH TRUMP! WE LIE BECAUSE WE LOVE YOU! . . . and now PEDO-PHOBE! BOY-MAN LOVE HATER! . . ad naseum. It is now quite evident that these globalists are intent on ripping apart America’s Judeo-Christian moral heritage and the Constitution. Video: American Intelligence Media, Americans for Innovation, Leader Technologies, Inc.



We must protect the vote. Now. We cannot allow these criminals to hijack any more elections. Free and fair elections are the property of the citizens in this Republic, not the government. We have gone to sleep. Now that we are awake, we must take action across this country in the coming weeks to protect the 2018 midterm elections.

We must ensure an unbroken bipartisan chain of custody. That should be your rallying cry. This will essentially eliminate the imminent danger from rigged electronic voting machines. Back to the future: (1) Voter IDs, (2) Paper ballots, (3) Inked thumbs, and (4) Unbroken bipartisan chain of custody! It is really that simple.

In addition, God-fearing citizens of the United States and the world must call upon President Trump and loyal American leaders to defund the feeder systems used by these SES corruptocrats.

Ask President Trump to write the check to Leader Technologies for their Miller Act Notice so they can help implement new technologies that respect Constitutional privacy and property and help implement a truly Free Press.


Mr. President, please pull the plug on these corruptocrats and their illegal funding streams. Since they are all based on fake values, no real services will be affected.

In addition, write the Miller Act Notice check to Leader Technologies for 18 years of unpaid use of their revolutionary social networking invention—which these Privy Council criminals have hijacked with the SES to takedown the American Republic.  This will generate new cash streams to free up our economy from the globalist stranglehold.  This will also empower Leader Technologies and other actually creative people in America to fix our foundering ship of state.  See Leader Technologies files trillion dollar bond lien on the U.S. Government.

One Miller Act Notice check starts the ball rolling, Mr. President.

In addition, Leader shareholders have proposed a win-win solution to the collapse of the American Free Press, as well a large new revenue source without raising taxes. Leader principals are willing to funnel these payments back into establishing a truly Free Press. See Leader proposes trillion dollar fed revenue while lowering taxes.


The Mechanics of Deception

The Illustrated Primer

Christopher Steele The Prince of Deception

Much has been said and written about Christopher Steele’s authorship of the notorious document that alleges Russia-Trump collusion. According to Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS (who plead the Fifth and only spoke through his lawyers), Steele was hired by them in June 2016 to gather information about “links between Russia and [then-presidential candidate] Donald Trump.” Pursuant to that business arrangement, Steele prepared a series of reports styled as intelligence briefings, some of which were later compiled into a collection of documents and published by a number of media outlets and later become known as the “Trump dossier.”

On the face of the dossier, it appears that Steele gathered his data from multiple sources in Russia, former Soviet union (FSU) countries, and the US. He then edited the raw intelligence—which seems to be a combination of conversations and notes—organized it in a summarized brief format, and published/leaked it in…

View original post 22,333 more words

Diane Feinstein and husband Richard C. Blum control MSM censorship with Lord Mark Malloch-Brown using AVID ISIS LeaderPlus election “management” software

Breaking feinstein

Dianne FeinsteinDiane Feinstein. (May 16, 2016). OGE Form 278 Financial Disclosure 2015. OGE.

AVID Feinstein 1

Moral: Control of Election Rigging Software is good for one’s net worth

Dianne Feinstein 2

Richard BlumAVID Technologies, Inc., Co. No. 0000896841. (Accessed Aug. 07,2018). Form 4 Insider Trading. SEC Edgar.

Feinstein chart

Blum Capital

AVID Leader Plus


Spread the truth. Forward this post to 10 people.


More globalist election rigging systems exposed

Brett Kavanaugh Swims With SES Sharks

Brett M. Kavanaugh, 2004 Plum Book

Senate Judicial Confirmation Hearing, 2004

“You are the company you keep”

“These RINOs orchestrated 9/11.”

H. Prt. 108-955. (Nov. 22, 2004). Plum Book, Policy and Supporting Positions. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. U.S. Senate, 106th Congress, 2d Session. Y 4.P 84/10:P 75/. GPO.

2004 Plum Book, p. 12

Kavanaugh - SES 1

All in the SES family. Kavanaugh’s wife is SES, yet he failed to disclose in his nomination speech that she, too, worked for Baby Bush.

Ashley Kavanaugh

2004 Plum Book, p.  13.


Ullyot TheodoreTheodore W. Ullyot became a mega millionaire after the Facebook initial public offering following Leader v. Facebook.

He presided over the fraud against the court in Leader v. Facebook by telling the court that Zuckerberg’s computers and hard drives from the 2003-2004 time period were “lost.” They were magically “found” (28 of them) just two days after the Federal Circuit court of appeals continued to rally around Facebook (and their massive personal investments in Facebook interests).

Theodore W. Ullyot (Facebook general counsel). (Accessed Jul. 13, 2018). Form 4, Insider Trading. SEC.

Ullyot Facebook

Comey is SES


Wray and Mueller are SES

Wray SESMueller SES.JPG

Dabney L. Friedrich – SES Deep State shadow government investor:

Horowitz AFIServed on the SES U.S. Sentencing Commission with DOJ Inspector General Michael E.Horowitz

In 2004, Kavanaugh’s SES colleague Karl Rove was rigging the Ohio election.

rove AFI

Kavanaugh confirmation hearing 1Kavanaugh confirmation hearing 2Kavanaugh confirmation hearing 3.JPG

We are sick and tired of Skull and Bonesmen. What kind of blackmail do they have on Kav?

Kavanaugh education

More SES grooming from the evil George Bush

Kavanaugh and Bush

Covington Burling LLP – where Eric H. Holder, Jr. hangs out now.

Williams & Connolly LLP – James P. Chandler, III’s go to for all FOIA stonewalling in the Hillary non-investigation.

Kavanaugh and Eric Holder

What skeletons will we find in this closet?

Kavanaugh Georgetown

Loves his SES Deep State media buddies

Kavanaugh and media

Protects the Clintons

Kavanaugh Foster

Deep State SES shadow government and his crony corporate bunk buddies:

Kavanaugh and law firms

Post-9/11 stonewalling excuse maker for Chief FOIA stonewaller, James P. Chandler, III, with his former law firm Williams & Connolly LLP.

Kavanaugh and records

Might as well have said “I represented the rogue C.I.A.”

Kavanaugh and rogue CIA.JPG

Kav helps RINOs with election rigging

Kavanaugh and elections.JPG

Bunk buddies Mueller and Comey handled this investigation.

Kavanaugh and FBI

This was his net worth then…can’t wait to see what he reports in his SCOTUS hearing.

Kavanaugh net worth

Kavanaugh financial disclosure.JPG

Translated in SES-speak “exempt” means “I don’t have to tell you peons a thing”.

Kav exempt 1Kav exempt 2Kav exempt 3Kav exempt 4Kav exempt 5


Technology is not good for everything – especially when it comes to voting integrity!

Two intellectual giants – Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben – explain the latest findings from their research into world-wide election rigging. Citizens around the world need to take time to listen to this interview and help restore integrity and honesty to their local, state, and country elections.

After you listen to the audio, then continue your “deep dive” into the research that the research teams at the Americans for Innovation and American intelligence Media have discovered for your use.

Call for election integrity NOW


Indictable Evidence: Foreign Interference in US Elections Since 2005


Election Rigging Keep Globalists Like Mitt Romney in Power


Malloch or MOLOCH? Either Way – Evil Is As Evil Does


Scrap election corruption

Queen Elizabeth II Rigs Elections Worldwide





We have your back, Jim




Perkins Coie Law Firm That Paid for Junk Steele Dossier is Behind Fake News Hit Piece on Jim Jordan

Reminder: Top clients of Perkins Coie in 2018:

perkins coie clients



Jim Jordon tweet


Gut Wrenching Jim Jordan Interview


And you treated him like a suspect. You sickened me @BretBaier – I will never subject myself to your hubris again. Shame on @FoxNews for letting Perkins Coie and Rosenstein besmirch this honorable man. #StandWithJimJordan

— JohnWickofPolitics (@Gingrich_of_PA) July 7, 2018

I’ll be straight up w/you: if we let the same players after Trump (Perkins Coie/Fusion/Rosenstein, et al) take @Jim_Jordan down, we are opening door to what is coming next for our president. Like The Godfather, the first R to call for his head, is the traitor #StandWithJordan

— JohnWickofPolitics (@Gingrich_of_PA) July 7, 2018


Matt Gaetz tweet



Same firm behind every DNC/Obama/Clinton project. Same firm behind the Jim Jordan accusations. Same firm behind “Trump-Russia” conspiracies… Perkins Coie. Get to know them.

— Jordan Schachtel (@JordanSchachtel) July 6, 2018


Congressman Jordan’s Nephew in Fatal Crash


Our thoughts and prayers are with Representative Jordan and his family. We hope that crash investigators are considering foul play with his nephew’s car crash as this incident reminds us of similar accidents:




Election Rigging Keep Globalists Like Mitt Romney in Power

Take a careful look at this chart below to see how YOUR VOTE can be manipulated by OpTech software. Then continue to read to see the global picture of election corruption that keeps evil globalists in charge, from Mitt Romney to Queen Elizabeth II.

Scrap election corruption
Scrap-Electronic-Voting-Machines-NOW pdf

As Romney already begins his anti-MAGA agenda, trash-talking Trump’s tariff policies, we can’t help but question how he won Utah’s primary. When will citizens start taking control of the election process?

Mitt Romney: ‘Trade wars are a tax on Americans’

.Mitt election machine






…seriously. How did this globalist win the primary in Utah with everything we know about his life-long political and banking corruption?

Mitt’s Criminal Past

…..just a precursor to his corruption today. Is someone in Utah paying attention to how the elections are being rigged?

Think your state or country is safe? THINK AGAIN.

Get involved and do something about it.

It is our job as citizens to protect the integrity of the voting process. Any agency, bureaucrat or politician that stands in the way of FULL TRANSPARENCY and BIPARTISAN CHAIN OF CUSTODY of the process must be challenged. Read the link below as we provide suggestions for citizens to get involved.

Will Romney Defeat Jenny Wilson by Rigging Utah Election with Smartmatic Machines?

The evidence for election machine corruption and foreign interference in elections is demonstrated in this flowchart.

Smartmatic history 1

.Smartmatic history 2


Smartmatic history 3

purple-fingerCitizens must demand voter identification, paper ballots, inked fingers, and hand-counts by bipartisan chain of control.

We don’t need speedy election results through their rigged digital system. We need accurate, fair, and transparent vote counting so that the We the People can restore honesty and integrity to the voting process.


Rod Rosenstein LIED at His Senate Confirmation Hearing and Has Huge Conflicts of Interest

Rosenstein lied at his Senate Confirmation Hearing, in writing (He might as well have written “I will consult the DOJ devil regarding potential conflicts of interest”). Shame on the Judiciary Committee for letting him get away with this deceptive non-answer.

rosensteinRosenstein deceived the public about his commitment to ethics and recusal when faced with conflicts of interest, like the fact that his wife Lisa Barsoomian is bunk buddies with the Clintons, Obamas, CIA, FBI, etc.

PN56-115th Congress (2017-2018). (Mar. 07, 2017). Rod J. Rosenstein Confirmation Hearing QUESTIONAIRE. Senate Judiciary.

Rosenstein takes NO responsibility for making his own ethical decisions. Instead, he defers the whole subject to an amorphous blob.

In law, a willful omission is a lie. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Since he actually rewrote DOJ Ethics Guidelines, he has no excuse. The public has a right to rely on ROSENSTEIN’S PERSONAL DECISIONS REGARDING ETHICS. “The DOJ devil allowed me do it” is not an excuse.

Rosenstein 1

Poppycock. No one in the Senate Judiciary Committee should have allowed him to get away with this non-answer.

Look at Rosenstein’s Honors and Awards – Can anyone say SES grooming?

Rosenstein resume 1.JPGRosenstein resume 2

Loyalty to the Queen?

Rosenstein 3Rosenstein eric Holder.JPGRosenstein 4Rosenstein 5

Not to mention…who he sleeps with. Outrageous conflict of interest – totally ignored!

Rosenstein and wife




Will Romney Defeat Jenny Wilson by Rigging Utah Election with Smartmatic Machines?

For those of you who have been asking about our recent article on Bipartisan Chain of Custody Act and what you need to do to start questioning your election officials, this post contains correspondence and notes among our research team with Washington State election officials. You may find them useful in demanding to know how your elections are operating.

There are questions that we asked in our FOIA requests to Washington State and should definitely be asked of the Utah election board since they use Smartmatic machines and our researchers have found an association with the machines, Mitt Romney, George Soros, and Sir Lord George Mark Malloch-Brown.

Indictable Evidence: Foreign Interference in US Elections Since 2005


Is this how Mitt won the Utah 2018 primary? Is this how he plans on beating the Democrat contender Jenny Wilson in November 2018? Someone needs to get this intel to his challenger Mike Kennedy as well as to Wilson.


These are questions that our researchers asked the state of Washington. You could ask your state the same questions.

I have not received satisfactory or conclusive evidence that bipartisan chain of custody is possible using the Smartmatic election machines or electronic devices of any kind in WA state’s voting process. It is the ‘people’s’ responsibility to ensure unbroken bipartisan chain of custody, and each ‘voting citizen’ has the right under the Federal and the WA state constitution to know that this is true.

We are not stating that there is ‘voter fraud’, we are asking simply for proof that bipartisan chain of custody is in reality–not broken beyond a ‘shadow of doubt’. Any action taken, whereby the ‘tally’ or ‘counts’ of any voting procedure are ‘hidden’ from observation, which is ‘impossible’ when it is performed and transmitted by ‘electrons’ in a ‘digital form’ fails the test of ‘unbroken bipartisan chain of custody observation as empirical evidence’.

At no time, can bipartisan chain of custody be subject to ‘FAITH’ , ‘law’, ‘vendor certification’, testing’ or any process’ that is ‘hidden from empirical observation’…when this is the basis for ‘certification’, it by logic, and physical law fails the test.

The will of the people cannot be subject ‘FAITH’ from government, the tally count must be ‘totally observable’ at all times, without failure. Electronic devices depend upon ‘failure modes’ or ‘statistical outcomes’ that depend upon ‘software programs’, ’embedded circuitry’, and ‘clean sine wave electricity’, which are ‘hidden from observation, and thus fail the test by default of logic of ‘unbroken bipartisan chain of custody’.

Thus, the WA state election process fails by default to pass the test for certification. It is open to ‘man in the middle attacks’, and corruption. As such, the ‘will of the people’ can be circumvented by sophistication, technology, and conspiracy through electronic means. This is the underlying logic of my FOIA requests.

FOIA request questions:

1. specifically name the 3rd party tester (and the actually testers themselves) and how that company and those people  are certified by a bipartisan chain of custody committee in WA?

2. When the memory stick is delivered to the county auditor by the vendor what ‘proof exists’, other than a ‘certification piece of paper’ that the ‘correct’ part number has been delivered?

3. Is the ‘memory stick, on which the tally at each county is entered and sent to the state, tested against an encrypted part number sent to the STATE and the AUDITOR by another communication channel such as certified mail to ensure that the proper ‘memory stick’ has been delivered to the auditor by comparison(a phone call recorded)?

4. What programs exist on the memory stick?

5. What circuits exist on the memory stick, and what circuits are ‘blue printed’ as the baseline as the ‘official circuits’, and how is this tested and reported as ‘clean’?

6. Are the ‘memory sticks’ impounded after the election, and are they available for inspection after the election and for how long, or is the evidence ‘erased’?

7. Is there a ‘micro-voltage’ activation ‘count’ embedded in the memory stick’s program, so that when it is received at the county auditor’s site, when ‘plugged in’ the count is visible to attest that it has not been reprogrammed during ‘transport’, by a ‘man in the middle’? (this would make the whole voting procedure a magic act as it exists)

8. Is each county auditor required to create a ‘bipartisan human hand tally’ as well as a PCOS/Smartmatic machine tally to audit each ‘tally count’ against each other, while preserving both tally counts as unbroken bipartisan chain of custody tallies?

Please provide the public records for these questions as a continuance of the original FOIA request as noted by your statement prior to closure. Thank you


These were the answers we received. The answer is highlighted in red. The note marked Note:## in blue is a side note from us.

First, thank you for reaching out to our office with you questions. I just want to make it clear that not Smartmatic voting system or equipment is not in use or certified for use in the State of Washington.

  1. specifically name the 3rd party tester (and the actually testers themselves) and how that company and those people  are certified by a bipartisan chain of custody committee in WA?

   a. Independent testing authorities (or commonly known as Voting System Testing Laboratories (VSTL)) are designated by the United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

Note:## As stated, FAITH does not translate into ‘bipartisan chain of custody’. There is a total ‘cognitive dissonance’ working in the state’s collective mind; such that they refuse to answer this question with each round. 

  1. When the memory stick is delivered to the county auditor by the vendor what ‘proof exists’, other than a ‘certification piece of paper’ that the ‘correct’ part number has been delivered?

a. County Auditors are required to do acceptance testing of their voting system prior to use as well as Logic and Accuracy Testing of the voting system prior to each election to ensure that the voting system, including hardware and software, is the certified voting system. Each voting system can produce a hash value that would correspond to the hash value provided by the Voting System Testing Laboratory. This hash value would show that the software in use has not been changed. (WAC 434-335-240 & RCW 29A.12.130). Logic and Accuracy tests are open to the public and election observers.

3. Is the ‘memory stick, on which the tally at each county is entered and sent to the state, tested against an encrypted part number sent to the STATE and the AUDITOR by another communication channel such as certified mail to ensure that the proper ‘memory stick’ has been delivered to the auditor by comparison(a phone call recorded)?

  a. If the ‘memory stick’ is part of the voting system, then yes that can be done. However, not all voting systems have ‘memory sticks’ as part of the voting system. Each County Auditor can choose the method they’d like to transfer election results from the tabulation system. For example, some counties use one-write media like CDs or DVDs and some use election specific USB drives that are formatted prior to use. In either case, they are secured before and after the election.

4. What programs exist on the memory stick?

a. None. They are only used to transfer files in some counties depending on the voting system and procedures in place for that county.

5. What circuits exist on the memory stick, and what circuits are ‘blue printed’ as the baseline as the ‘official circuits’, and how is this tested and reported as ‘clean’?

Note:## The county auditor lied to me. She specifically stated that the ‘state’ sends the memory stick and it is not up to them to choose the media on which they transfer information to the state! 

       a. This would be county specific based on the ‘memory sticks’  in use for the voting system and procedures in place for that county.

6. Are the ‘memory sticks’ impounded after the election, and are they available for inspection after the election and for how long, or is the evidence ‘erased’?

  a. This is county specific depending on the voting system and procedures in place for that county because not all counties use the same voting system and not all use ‘memory sticks’. All documents related to the election have a retention and must be retained for their entire retention period. (

7. Is there a ‘micro-voltage’ activation ‘count’ embedded in the memory stick’s program, so that when it is received at the county auditor’s site, when ‘plugged in’ the count is visible to attest that it has not been reprogrammed during ‘transport’, by a ‘man in the middle’? (this would make the whole voting procedure a magic act as it exists)

a. Election Results are verified using a paper copy of the results. When results are transported from the tabulation equipment to be uploaded to the state, a paper copy of the results is used to verify the results are appearing accurately. Additionally, that same paper copy is provided to the state to ensure that after the results were uploaded they match the physical copy of the results. There are several methods and opportunities, as stated in our previous response, for auditing during the election canvassing to ensure the tabulation equipment is accurate. 

NOTE##: Here is the problem: the count is still hidden. It does not matter how many tests are run prior to the ballots being entered, if the media is not ‘tested’. Also, if the media is sent by any method other than a bipartisan group of humans, bipartisan chain of custody is lost. There is no mention of a standard method. I guess each Auditor can choose!!!

8. Is each county auditor required to create a ‘bipartisan human hand tally’ as well as a PCOS/Smartmatic machine tally to audit each ‘tally count’ against each other, while preserving both tally counts as unbroken bipartisan chain of custody tallies?

a. Smartmatic voting systems are not certified or used in the State of Washington.

NOTE##: He didn’t answer the question. He simply stated that Smartmatic is not used. However, another machine is used, but they do not volunteer that information. 

Answers in red given by

Stuart Holmes| Voting Information Systems Manager

Office of the Secretary of State

(360) 725-5794 |




Four questions we asked from Washington State Records/Public Disclosure Officer as a FOIA request and her answers back to us.

Below is information provided by our Elections Division.

  1. How do you ensure bi-partisan ‘chain of custody’ on any electronic device that sits between the voter and the ‘county/city/special district’ for local elections, and the ‘state’ for state elections, and the ‘federal election’ for federal positions?

To answer your question, I’m interpreting “electronic device” as an in-person ballot marking system that retains an electronic voting record of each vote cast, direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine, and the county’s voting system that tabulates returned ballots.

Before any voting system can be used in the State of Washington it first must be tested and certified by an independent testing authority designated by the United States election assistance commission as well as inspected and tested by the Secretary of State’s Office (RCW 29A.12.080). During the Secretary of State’s inspection of the voting system we ensure it meets our requirements for all voting systems (WAC 434-335-040) which include “Secures to the voter secrecy in the act of voting” and “Be capable of being secured with lock and seal when not in use”.

The Secretary of State’s Office requires the use of secure storage which must employ the use of numbered seals and logs, or other security measures which will detect any inappropriate or unauthorized access to the secured ballot materials and must be accompanied by at least two county auditor staff at all times. (WAC 434-261-045, WAC 434-250-110 & RCW 29A.40.110). The seal logs or other measures used by every county document the chain of custody for who accessed the secured ballots which includes electronic voting devices that retain electronic voting records. However, part of our state certification requirements of any voting system is that the voting device must produce a voter verifiable paper ballot.

Additionally, observers may be present during the processing of ballots because the entire process is open to the public.

  1. How do you ensure that the ‘electronic devices’ are monitored by ‘bipartisan’ citizens, trained to monitor the ballot tally totals?

Prior to each election, the County Auditor must request observers be appointed by the major political parties to be present during the processing of ballots. Campaigns or organizations may also be requested to appoint observers. The County Auditor can train observers with respect to ballot processing procedures and the vote tallying system (RCW 29A.40.100 & WAC 434-261-020)

  1. do you ensure the bipartisan election monitors/judges can affirmatively verify that each vote is entered, reported, and tallied without intervention by unseen software modules whose operations do not appear to be empirically observable?

Prior to certification of the election the County Auditor must audit of results of votes cast on any direct recording electronic voting devices used in the county, if applicable, a random check of the ballot counting equipment, and an audit of duplicated ballots.

In 2019, Risk Limiting Audits will become an option for counties to use to audit their voting equipment. Rules for conducting a Risk Limiting Audit will be in place no later than January 1, 2019. Risk Limiting Audits provide statistical evidence and confidence that the count was accurate while keeping the resources needed by the county to as little as possible.

  1. I request the ‘public records’ that prove the above questions regarding the usage of all ‘electronic devices’ used in the voting process…all stages where ‘datum’ is processing in any manner by non-humans, as part of the voting procedure that results in a ‘summation’, ‘addition’, ‘subtraction’, ‘tally’, ‘vote count’ as an ‘official’ record of the voting process. 

If you’re interested in the chain of custody logs, observer procedures, audit procedures, or specific documents about the use of the voting system you’d need to request those documents from the County Auditor because the Secretary of State’s Office does not process any ballots, conduct tabulation, or operate a voting system.

If you’re interested in the Election Assistance Commission testing and certification of the voting systems, those test reports and certifications are available here:

We also have information about the system in use in Washington on our website here:

I trust you will find this information useful.  If you have any further questions, please let me know.  Otherwise, I am closing this request today.


Brenda Galarza

Records/Public Disclosure Officer

PO Box 40224 | Olympia, WA  98504-0224

360-704-5220 Phone | 360-704-7830 Fax




Notes from our research team as we were analyzing these comments from Washington State officials in the above correspondences:

This only assumes that the hash value created didn’t change. That doesn’t address the integrity of the underlying software program. If the embedded backdoor program is burned on the firmware, hardware or operating system, then this hash value is not useful. This does not address the problems of lack of VISUAL verification.

These procedures do not address bipartisan chain of custody. They force the chain of custody to accept all this integrity testing in faith.

In fact, this process forces the election judges to LIE when they certify the vote (since they CANNOT know if the underlying software is counting properly). It forces them to break the law.


I will wait for tomorrow for today’s results. I’m ‘cc’ing all state elected on these request, and two newspapers. I’m trying to call as much attention to this as possible. The only way this will change is to start an ‘Initiative’, which in WA state is the only way the people can really change anything. I am speaking with a person who knows the process. As Levoy Finicum stated, “Its time to stand up against tyranny”.


Tested or not does not absolve the bipartisan chain of custody certifiers  from empirically counting themselves. If they don’t, their certification is fraudulent…. a lie by 100% of the certifiers!!! They’re called the election judges in my state.


The state says that Smartmatic machines are not used in WA state.


Washington election 2Smartmatic in Washington


Important update (June 30, 2018)

Look what Mitt Romney has invested in:

Hart IinterCivic Group Board of Directors and Ownership

In July 2011, Hart received what Hart described as “a strategic investment” from H.I.G. Capital,[5] in a transaction that Hart’s advisors called an “acquisition.”[6]

As of October 2012, the Board has five members: Gregg Burt, Chairman; Phillip Braithwaite, Chief Executive Officer; Neil Tuch, Managing Director, H.I.G. Capital; Jeff Bohl, Principal, H.I.G. Capital; and Amanda Kalin, Associate, H.I.G. Capital.[7] HIG controls 3 out of 5 board seats.

Two of the H.I.G. Directors that work for H.I.G., Neil Tuch and Jeff Bohl, have previously made contributions to presidential campaigns – Neil Tuch contributed to both the Obama and Romney campaigns prior to H.I.G.’s investment in Hart InterCivic, and Jeff Bohl contributed to the Romney campaign in 2011.[8] As of October 2012, H.I.G. is the 11th largest of all the contributors to the Romney effort.[9]

H.I.G. counts Solamere Capital as a minor investor in one of its funds.[8] Solamere Capital is an investment firm founded by Mitt Romney‘s, son, Tagg Romney, and Spencer Zwick, Mitt Romney’s campaign finance chair[10] and in which Mitt Romney’s brother, Scott, and Mitt Romney’s wife, Ann, and Mitt Romney himself has invested, and which is run by Tagg Romney.[9] Solamere is not invested in the specific H.I.G. fund that has an investment in Hart InterCivic.[8]

Hart IntercivicMitt Romney is right in the middle of the investment capital groups for Hart InterCivic voting machines, the ones used in Utah where he just won.


Mitt violated ethics laws by not disclosing these relationships.


Court Fight Between Smartmatic and Sequoia over Proposed Hart InterCivic Take-over of Sequoia Reveals Smartmatic Ownership of VoteCounting Software in Sequoia Voting Machines Smartmatic’s ownership of the voting-counting software in Sequoia voting machines came to light in litigation over an offer by Hart InterCivic to “purchase the outstanding loan and earn-out provision agreement that Sequoia Voting Systems maintains with its former parent company,” Smartmatic.

Counsel for Hart InterCivic represented in court that Smartmatic still owned the software used in Sequoia voting machines and would license that software to Hart InterCivic upon its take-over of Sequoia. According to the court, counsel for Hart InterCivic declared that “Sequoia currently uses [Smartmatic’s] intellectual property [currently found in Sequoia’s machines] pursuant to certain license agreements.”

So, WA state lied indirectly. They stated that Smartmatic machines are not used in WA state….however, the ‘software used by Sequoia solutions, has been licenses to Hart Intercivic….which is what WA uses. So, it is not a direct lie, but it is an obfuscation of a very controversial truth.




A major scandal associated with Hart InterCivic are the reports in 2014 that announced the potential bias and link between Hart InterCivic employees and Mitt Romney. As mentioned above, Hart InterCivic was acquired by H.I.G. Capital, making most of Hart’s board of directors H.I.G. employees. H.I.G. was founded by Tony Tamer, a former employee of Mitt Romney. 21 of the 22 H.I.G. American citizens donated to Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign.

A majority of the Romney supporters on the Hart board of directors were proven to be directly associated with Bain, which fundraised money for Romney. The Hart InterCivic voting machines were in use in key states, such as Colorado and Ohio, and had experienced failures in previous elections. This created a fear that the company would rig future election results in Romney’s favor. The claims against Hart InterCivic refueled the conversation about the 2003 Diebold controversy. The public associated Hart’s potential partisan bias with that of Diebold’s CEO’s public support of the Bush administration




“Private companies like ES&S, Dominion (previously of Diebold or Sequoia), Smartmatic, and Hart Intercivic make most of the electronic voting machines. Three of five board members at Hart Intercivic are board members at HIG Capital, a global private equity firm that made a significant investment in the voting machine company.

The Washington Post reported “HIG employees as a whole have donated $338,000 to the Romney campaign this year, according to Open Secrets.” Hart supplied the electronic voting machines that were used in the 2012 elections in precincts in Ohio, Texas, Oklahoma, Washington, Colorado and many other states.”

Odd…some sources say Smartmatic, others say Hart Intercivic…however they all have relationships with HIG Capital. I think all roads may lead to London eventually..!


This article says that Utah will vote by ‘mail’ for 2018. It does not say how the ballots are tabulated. All articles focus on the ‘ballot process’, and never discuss the machines. As we know this is where the ‘magic’ happens. So this election cycle, they used their ‘old machines’ which I think are the old Smartmatic/Hart InterCivic software combo, but I can’t find proof yet. I think they use the same as WA state….which is a failure to disclose by Mitt, and surely should invalidate his victory. Who is going to break the news to his opponents? Did another Republican run?


I’m sorry guys, the info is changing by the hour. Now Utah has place voting machines in all of the polling places.  This is an instructional video.


ES&S, the voting machines used in UTAH 2018, is actually Diebold software. It seems to be a hybrid of Premier, Diebold, and Dominion. In every instance, for voting, there are investors tied directly to either Lord Brown or Rothschild…thus the Queen…this is for all voting machines. Between ES&S and Smartmatic’s software, 99% of all voting machines are under some investment control that can be traced back to the Queen for all of the world.

What total effect this has, is unknown. However, I do not want my vote counted by ‘any machine’ let alone a machine tied to the Crown that uses reprocessed software passed on through licenses to all of the voting machine companies. Paper ballots and CCTV cameras are the only way to vote. Give me a purple thumb!

ES&S was formed in 1997 by a merger of Omaha based American Information Systems (AIS) and Dallas based Business Records Corp. (BRC). BRC was partially owned by Cronus Industries, a company with connections to the Hunt brothers from Texas, as well as other individuals and entities, including Rothschild, Inc.

In 2010, Dominion Voting Systems acquired Premier Election Solutions, Inc., once owned by Diebold and then an owned subsidiary of Election Systems and Software (ES&S). With this acquirement, Dominion Voting Systems gained ownership of all of Premier’s intellectual property, software, firmware, and hardware. To understand the controversy that stemmed from this purchase, we must look at the history of a previous owner of Premier.




Smartmatic Announces Cease of Operations in Venezuela

Mar 7 18

Smartmatic announced that after 15 years of service and 14 elections assisted providing a secure and auditable voting system, Smartmatic closed its offices and ceased operations in Venezuela. The reasons for the closure are widely known. In August of 2017, after the elections to the National Constituency Assembly, Smartmatic publicly stated that the National Elections Council had announced results that were different from those reflected by the voting system. This episode led to an immediate rupture of the client-provider relationship.

National elections Council provided a different tally than the machines….so Smartmatic picked up and left the country! Mot likely before the hangman arrived.


clear ballotClear Ballot, founded by former Lotus Development executive Larry Mooreprovided vote-counting audits in the state of Maryland and several counties in Florida during the 2016 presidential election. Now the technology in the process of being certified at the national level. Clear Ballot also announced a deal with King County in Washington, which includes Seattle, where 1.2 million voters will have their ballots counted by the company’s tech.

Here’s a ‘red flag’ already. Clear Ballot was started by Lotus Notes executive Larry Moore.


What a nightmare this voting machine is from a security perspective. There is no end to how easy it would be to hack this puppy.


We are starting to see a pattern develop with all of these elections machines. The more they are used, the more the globalist’s hand picked agents are elected.  All through Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, and most notably, Chicago was the first to adopt and guess who benefitted ….’Obummer’ as Senator. Just in time. If our assumption is true, Smartmatic, Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia, Premier, and Dominion are all part of the same conspiracy…they all use basically the same network of people, investors, hardware and software. This may be a key to unlocking some historical issues.

sequoia voting machine

Acquisition and divestiture of Sequoia

In 2005, Smartmatic acquired Sequoia Voting Systems, one of the leading US companies in automated voting products[144] from the British company De La Rue.[14] One of the owners of De La Rue, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, “had strong ties with Venezuela” and advised British Petroleum.[14] Greenstock had also worked beside future board member of Smartmatic, Lord Malloch-Brown.[145][146]

Following this acquisition, U.S. Representative Carolyn B. Maloney requested an investigation to determine whether the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a committee of the United States Department of the Treasury that reviews whether companies in the United States are being controlled by foreign individuals, had followed correct processes to green-light sale of Sequoia to Smartmatic, which was described as having “possible ties to the Venezuelan government”.[147]

The investigation was prompted after a March 2006 electoral fiasco in Chicago and Cook County, where a percentage of the machines involved were manufactured by Sequoia, and Sequoia provided technical assistance, some by a number of Venezuelan nationals flown in for the event.[148] According to Sequoia, the tabulation problems were due to human error, as a post-election check identified only three mechanical problems in 1000 machines checked.[148] Election officials blamed poor training.[149] Some problems with the election were later blamed on a software component, developed in Venezuela, for transmitting the voting results to a central computer.[36]

After initially cooperating with the CFIUS investigation in October 2006, particularly to clarify the company’s ownership,[150] Smartmatic withdrew in December 2006 and sold Sequoia without sharing who may have been involved in the company.[151]


Smartmatic is Sequoia and Hart InterCivic is Sequoia. Hart InterCivic simply agreed to not compete with Smartmatic in Latin America, the Philippines, and Belgium. In a convoluted licensing agreement, it appears that Hart InterCivic, the predominant WA state voting machine provide, is Smartmatic in everything but name. WA state directly told me that Smartmatic is not used in WA state.


This is sick..President Carter is an investor in Smartmatic through the Carter Center…the sole subcontractor for the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), which visited Venezuela multiple times with IFES to review and make recommendations for the Venezuelan government. Guess who won the next election….CHAVEZ!

USAID Electoral Systems

 The USAID, IFES, Carter Center, CNE and Smartmatic connection

In June 1998, the National Electoral Council (CNE) of Venezuela contracted the International Foundation for Election Systems IFES to renew and make recommendations regarding proposals for an automated voting system in Venezuela [21, page 27]. IFES has been awarded (award number AEP-I-00-00-00007-00) [link], an “indefinite quantity contract” (IQC) by USAID with the following purpose:

“To support the transition to, and consolidation of, democratic governments through which citizens choose their leaders and participate in all levels of political decision-making, particularly in transition and sustainable development countries” [22, page 30].

According to Carter Center’s America’s Programme director Jennifer McCoy “President Carter had traveled several times to Venezuela, including monitoring the 1998 and 2000 elections, and he and President Chavez built avery good personal relationship” [23]. Such warm relationship may have come about due to the fact that the Carter Center is the sole subcontractor of IFES for the aforementioned purpose.




What’s Up With All of This Election Fraud?

This is what we’ve created to date. There are more companies being formed. The research is exhausting, in terms of complexity. The trend is to form a company, develop, spin off into an investment group, rename, re-license, and form again with new directors and stockholders. Then do it again, purchasing the same tech under a new name from a spinoff. New name, same tech, new hardware, new money from new investors…spin again, until caught…run, hide, spin, start all over again.

We will continue to diagram the history. An entire new set of diagrams can be created just with the investment groups. This would complete the picture.

In the meantime, there are new companies that are trying to make voting secure with jpegs, separate validations, etc. on separate machines. However, no tech of any kind can maintain the ‘multi-party chain of custody’, as the human eye cannot perceive silicon circuits, software induced voltages, and that which is hidden from empirical observation. We can only ‘trust’ the process and the people.

This flies in the face of the entire concept of a Republic, which was formed on the concept that ‘authority’, being given from the ‘power of the people’, who gain it directly from ‘God’, must be ‘separated’ with ‘jurisdictional boundaries’, so that the ‘tendency of man’, with ‘too much authority to ‘oppress’ can be muted by that separation. Centralizing the voting process so that the ‘Fake News’ can report a sensationalized and profitable result is pure idiocy.

We the People, do not have to trust government, and should not. We must insist at all times, under all circumstances, the dual-Federalism is maintained, and the job of the people is to ensure that the ‘boundaries’ are maintained. We must all be mechanics of the Republic.

This message of voter fraud by electronics, must be given to the POTUS ASAP.

WA state systems:

Smartmatic history 1

.Smartmatic history 2


Smartmatic history 3



Help a Democrat #Walkaway

We had already planned that July would be Democrats for Trump Awareness Month at the American Intelligence Media. We started dropping our teasers into Truth News Headlines in early June. Over the last few weeks the momentum has grown so much, so fast, that the movement has caught up with us.

Let’s continue growing this movement, patriots. We have a big tent and all MAGA patriots are welcomed to join the party.

This month please give extra attention to welcoming your circle of influence to join the #Walkaway movement. Read below the excitement we are seeing for this grassroots campaign.

Do your part. Make a meme. Record a fun song and send it in to us for posting. Host a neighborhood BBQ and invite a Democrat and discuss things that you can agree on – like safety, jobs, low-crime, even lower taxes.

Let us know what you are doing so that we can make July the biggest month yet for increasing the Trump MAGA base.

walkaway is for real

Convert posts:

Guys– you wouldn’t believe what’s happening on Twitter. It’s like everything has reached critical Mass this week: the hashtag #walkaway is exploding! People who are registered Dems walking away from the insanity of the left! You gotta go read these: many of them are African American and Hispanic, many women, many who were even what you would call activists and volunteers in the party, walking away! from the crazy! It’s amazing!

Sofia walkaway


No communism.JPG


Amazing insight into the last 4 days on the #WalkAwaymovement. Over half a Million mentions on Social media. What I found even more amazing was the fact that those mentions are spreading to over 2 BILLION PEOPLE !! This is not a small thing.

— David Eliason (@deliason12) June 28, 2018


Wollery tweet


#WalkAway – Lifelong Democrat, voted for Obama 2x. Election 2016 was an eye opener to the lying, angry, controlling, vicious left.The more I researched, the more I found to discredit them. I realized I had been duped all those years. I am a #FreeThinker

— Robin M. Wayman (@RobinMWayman921) June 28, 2018


PArscale MAGA


When I realized 1) how subtly bigoted the democrats were in pushing “identity politics” & 2) that the GOP is actually more inclusive towards all minorities and free thought, I had to #WalkAway

— Gabe Levin (@GabeLevin37) June 28, 2018


Democrats – Somebody That I Used To Know #WalkAway


Dana Wefer


Here is another fun insight. Where are these conversations happening??? Mainly in the coastal States! Look at the center of the country? Nothing…..They already get it. Love Social listening tools that give these pure insights. Unbiased. Just the numbers

— David Eliason (@deliason12) June 28, 2018


Democrats for Trump Awareness Month




Detroit walkaway


Big Tent small