Mike and Doug review the updates made on the Interlocking Organizations chart. Make sure to drop inside and see the expanded version. If you own shares in any of these companies, contact their accounting office and/or investor relations and ask them why they have not disclosed this information to shareholders.
Then, find out who are the company financial auditors for their public annual reports and contact them, in writing, as well. Put all of them on notice that if any of YOUR SHARES go bust, you will sue them for insider trading. You may use this amazing chart that the miners prepared for you:
We wrote two sample letters for you to send to company auditors and investor relations, putting them on notice that YOU, the SHAREHOLDER, demand to know why they haven’t told you about these interlocking directorships.
Make sure to print the charts and include them in your letters.
Douglas, Michael, and Tyla explain why Zoom is a dangerous Chinese product designed to surveil Americans at work and play for the benefit of the Highlands Group, communist China, the Pilgrims Society, and the British Imperial Empire.
We have been watching with much consternation the roll out of the video conferencing platform called Zoom. Its spectacular rise in popularity has been fueled by the forced imprisonment of citizens in their homes during the COVID false flag operation intended to lock down all humanity in a digital prison planet for the benefit of the Pilgrims Society’s total control of the world.
As their evil always starts, you think it is so nice and convenient. And FREE, too. Everyone in your family can connect by Zoom and have social interactions while being confined to their home imprisonment. Next, Zoom became the online vehicle to run your business meetings. We had a first hand experience of a local court proceeding where we were required to participate by Zoom. No courtroom and bailiff. Just the judge, plaintiff, defendant, and witness all on a Zoom call. Totally unprofessional and spooky, knowing what we do about internet surveillance.
Millions of students across the world have been forced into Zoom classrooms. They sit in front of their computer for the designated class time, all the while being surveiled and observed by who knows what, from who knows where, while being electronically tethered to their device during the set classroom day/time. There have been many reports of pornography just showing up in random picture frames. (We will explain why this happens during our audio discussion.)
And wouldn’t you know it…we found the same nest of swamp rats that we always find in these interlocking relationships and hedge funds.
We need to do the same with Zoom, as well as immediately ban any government use of Zoom in the United States. No government meeting should EVER be conducted over Zoom. China is watching, listening, and recording. Period.
Here’s a look at a component needed to run Zoom. And it just so happens that our team has the experience to explain how this operates and why it gives China a portal into every home, school, office, and Zoom meeting in the world.
This claim arises from the acts or omissions of the defendant. Details of said acts or omissions in correcting the description by the New York Board of Elections Law for those running for office requirements to hold office of President of the United States (POTUS) and or Vice President of the United States (VPOTUS) (see Exhibit C) deceptively states that citizenship status must be “BORN A CITIZEN” as per United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)() as if one of the requirements of the US Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 rather than the express “NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN” (NBC) Term of Art is born on soil of citizen parents explained by the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in Minor v. Happersett, 88U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875) ().
State of New York Court of Claims CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, and AD HOC NEW YORKER REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE Claimants v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK Defendant MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIM WITH DEMAND BY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Claimant, Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse Sui Juris sole beneficiary of the name registered in commerce CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK and trustee of the AD HOC NEW YORKER REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE, in propria persona submits this MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIM of Three Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-Five Dollars ($388,395) in lost opportunity cost against THE STATE OF NEW YORK under the Court of Claims Act (CTC) §3-b, for willfully using “BORN A CITIZEN” dis-information with malice from 2008 thru 2020 shown in Exhibit C, and is done instead of the NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN requirement of the U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 referenced in the chart shown in Exhibit C for anyone Running For Office President of the United States (POTUS) and by operation of law Vice President of the United States (VPOTUS), appended with the original and two copies with the Fee for the Clerk of the Court according under CTC § 11 I § 11-A, and with this extraordinary DEMAND BY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF with irreparable harm, with a likelihood of success under the current law of the land that is based upon the preponderance of evidence shown in exhibit, time is of the essence; and Further, under the requirements of Absentee Balloting that according to Exhibit A schedule for conducting the 3 November 2020 election: • Any request for an Absentee Ballot according to Exhibit E starts on September 18, 2020 and explains the schedule quote: “You must apply online, postmark, email or fax a completed application or letter request for the General Election Absentee ballot no later than 7 days (October 27, 2020) before the election. You may apply in-person up to the day before the election (November 2, 2020). You may file an application at any time before the deadlines, but ballots will be mailed out beginning on or about September 18, 2020. (PLEASE BE AWARE THAT DESPITE THE ABOVE DEADLINES THE POST OFFICE HAS ADVISED THAT THEY CANNOT GUARANTEE TIMELY DELIVERY OF BALLOTS APPLIED FOR LESS THAN 15 DAYS BEFORE AN ELECTION.)
That voting starts on or about October 19, 2020 • And that based upon my interview of July 22, 2020 shown at Claim paragraph 29, going into 3 November 2020, my commissioner told me in part quote: ” … that masks are voluntary and if not worn a mask or plastic visor will be offered to wear while voting in person, and if rejected the Voter may use a machine properly spaced from other voters”; and • this OSC demand is notwithstanding the arbitrary politicallockdown that varies on a state by state basis to defeat POTUS Donald J. Trump, a lawless set of arbitrary executive order that seemingly have a political life of their own that involves the 2013 Fauci/Obama facilitated Chinese Gain -of-Function modified bio-weapon SARS COV-2 Virus aka COVID-19 (with the on or about 22 August 2020 CDC admission (I) that the actual mortality rate when separated in stark contrast to other morbidity factors is less than say 12,000 deaths to date attributed solely to SARS COV-2, has been fraudulently contrived for political and state financial reasons on a state by state basis-that will end in Federal indictments), That Claimant respectfully demands injunctive relief for cause that the State be ordered to: a. CLARIFY FOR ALL POTENTIAL VOTERS THAT BORN A CITIZEN SUGGESTED BY THE STATE SHOWN AT EXHIBIT C DOES NOT INCLUDE A 14TH AMENDMENT BORN A CITIZEN INTERPRETATION, ONLY INCLUDES THE PRE 14TH AMENDMENT U.S. CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 2 SECTION 1 CLAUSE 5 NATURAL BORN CITIZEN TERM OF ART THAT REQUIRES A CANDIDATE FOR POTUS AND OR VPOTUS MUST BE BORN ON SOIL OF CITIZEN PARENTS ACCORDING TO THE SCOTUS; FINDINGS IN Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875) and United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and b. THAT ALL REQUESTS FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS MAKE SUCH CLARIFICATION and c. THAT NOTICE IS PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED AT THE POLLS THAT KAMALA DEVI HARRIS IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN; and d. Additional different relief as the court deems necessary for justice herein.
There is a distinct difference between Natural-Born Citizen, Born A Citizen and a naturalized Citizen with a myriad set of statutory variations that we fought a revolution over the fact that we (including my family who have been here on my father’s side since 1756) do not want to be subjects of a arbitrary and capricious totalitarian potentate; and Further in short, back in 2012, I sat with NYS Assistant Attorney General Joel Graber along with the multiple defendants attorneys in the case Kings County Supreme Court 6500-2011 before the hearing convened to present my offer to settle the case were the State to change the Running for Office erroneous Born a Citizen language to Natural Born Citizen, and to the amazed groans of the expensive witnessing attorneys, Mr. Graber rejected the offer, and as such 12 years later now inures to t~is claim that arises from the malicious political acts of the defendant-especially under an ignorant mass murdering dynastic tyrant – who is too dimwitted to be a Maoist would wear a dunce cap, resembles the Jesuit trained Pol Pot who measured opposition with his brown shirt core to surveil all persons, in particular those who wore glasses because it meant they could read; and from my own experience since 1973, here and now we face results of budget woes that has released State psychiatric patients closed facilities and with municipal leaders set prisoners onto the streets with no bail requirements as a war to maintain power against civil society.
Yes we are long over-due for results to correct the details of said acts or omissions, if you wish, to at least correct the description by the New York Board of Elections Law for those running for office requirements to hold office of POTUS and or VPOTUS shown in Exhibit C that deceptively states that citizenship status must be “BORN A CITIZEN” as per United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)(!l)) as if one of the requirements of the US Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 rather than the express “NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN” (NBC) Term of Art is born on soil of citizen parents explained by the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875) <l2D.
A two sided copy of each seminal case is appended herewith for the use of the Court. That my fellow trustee of AD HOC NEW YORKER REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE described in Exhibit B has faxed a copy of the Claim to the Attorney General who will have a follow-up copy of this Memo and Notarized Claim with citations annexed sent by USPS Certified Mail 7017 1070 0000 8250 9700 with certification of service having been notarized accordingly.
Over 110 years ago, at a time when medicine was not yet sufficiently advanced to have developed penicillin and the germ theory of medicine was still new, the Supreme Court of the United States made a ruling related to a citizen’s rights in healthcare that has remained largely unaddressed to this day. Over the century plus of time that has since passed the court has decided many critical cases revolving around individual rights that have never been squared with Jacobson.Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).
A century ago many of our most sacred and fundamental rights were still being sorted out. Suffrage had not yet occurred, civil rights barely existed, critical cases on fundamental rights such as interstate travel and bodily privacy had not come into play and the administrative state that we live in today simply did not exist.
Today, under the guidance of an unelected administrative structure, many of the rights our Supreme Court has determined are fundamental under our Constitution are being denied. These fundamental rights are being denied, not out of prudence, they are being denied due to unfounded fear and intentional manipulation. So successful is this manipulation that even our esteemed Chief Justice, the Honorable Justice Roberts, was misled in a recent decision.
But all is not lost. In its wisdom, the Jacobsoncourt made clear that it never intended its decision to bar further review. To the contrary, the Court in Jacobsonspecifically stated:“Before closing this opinion, we deem it appropriate, in order to prevent misapprehension as to our views, to observe –perhaps to repeat a thought already sufficiently expressed, namely –that the police power of a State, whether exercised by the legislature or by a local body acting under its authority, may be exerted in such circumstances or by regulations so arbitrary and oppressive in particular cases as to justify the interference of the courts to prevent wrong and oppression.” (Id, 197 US 38)
In recent months, entire states have been imprisoned without due process and with the clear threat to impose such lockdowns again, interstate travel has been severely restricted, privacy rights have been devastated, numerous business takings without compensation, and many regulations being implemented without statutory process requirements under the guise of a health emergency that is roughly as dangerous as a seasonal influenza outbreak. The plaintiffs in this case have all been injured in various capacities by these unconstitutional actions, and without action by the Court, will be left without redress.
More terrifying, without action by the Court, the Court will be setting future precedent that will allow states to withhold fundamental Constitutional rights, in violation of US Supreme Court precedent, circumventing the various levels of scrutiny applied to such rights, and justify such actions under public health emergency orders without subjecting those orders to any real review –just trust the bureaucrats because they are the experts.
We humbly ask the Court in this case to:
Reaffirm its position as a coequal branch of the government.
2. Reaffirm the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that rights, especially fundamental rights, may not be abridged unless necessary to serve a compelling governmental interest, and that even then, those restrictions must be narrowly tailored to meet acompelling governmental interest.
3. Ensure there is an opportunity for redress under any emergency declaration
4. Recognize that the political process and operative orders are invalid if based on false or misleading information (cite rule making case in admin law) and recognize the criticality that all future emergency orders be based and maintained on clear, honest facts -particularly when such orders are infringing on Constitutional rights.
Underlying all of this, and the foundation of this case is this question: if an emergency can be declared without the appropriate level of review based on the rights being limited, and under the guise of that emergency all rights are only subject to a rational basis review, how then do any previous judicial opinions or Constitutional principles have any meaning whatsoever?
Further, if under the same circumstances different levels of scrutiny are applied to the various rights being limited under an emergency declaration than would otherwise be applicable, what is the value of having various levels of review?
British Health Minister Matt Hancock MP from a long line of Pilgrims Society globalism
British Health Minister Matt Hancock MP who just trashed anti-vaxxers in Parliament yesterday, Sep. 01, 2020, is teaming with Facebook vice president Sir Nick Clegg to attack anti-vaxxers.
Wife’s family is deeply (British) Pilgrims Society, involved in digital, biological and psychological warfare
Comments in Parliament yesterday are an admission of British government interference in the US 2020 elections.
Here’s the actual UK Parliamentary record that is judicially-recognizable evidence in a court proceeding about direct British interference in U.S. election via Facebook & plan to attack vaccine critics
Hancock’s grandfather-in-law was Baron Frederick Millar, a member of the (British) Pilgrims Society and an enemy of a free American Republic
Matthew John David Hancock, MP [VIDEO]. (Sep. 01, 2020). Question from MP Chris Elmore (Ogmore) re. starting campaign to tackle anti-vaxxers, Nick Clegg, Facebook, The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Matt Hancock), Vol. No. 679, Column 23, 3.35 pm. Hansard UK Parliament.
Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP
Matt Hancock is the Conservative MP for West Suffolk, and has been an MP continuously since 6 May 2010. He currently holds the Government post of Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.
This is very disturbing because it may be an attack on an American citizen by foreign actors. Ashli has a YouTube channel called the DanjA zonE. We watch her videos for entertaining clips of the royal families. Ashli has a unique colorful “scrapbook” style presentation and has a sizeable audience.
Her topics are tabloid-like, but lately they have been getting more controversial. With over 34 million views, she is hardly ‘not noticed’ by folks researching the royals.
Lately we have been concerned for Ashli because her titles are getting “splashier” and closer to the viper’s den of the Pilgrims Society, the Monarch, and the Privy Council. It doesn’t appear that Ashli understands how dangerous the situation is right now. Does she know that Buckingham Palace is boarded up and citizens are rioting outside the gates with chants of P – E – D – O?
Does she know that the enemy of the planet is located with the Queen and the British Imperial Empire?
The enemy knows that somewhere out here in internet land people are waking up about the royals and their crimes. It would be easy to do an internet search and find Ashli’s hundreds of videos. It would be very easy for the enemy to locate her IP address and, by satellite, launch an accelerated particle beam. Listen to her story and pay careful attention to how the houses burst into flames.
Ashli is having to work through some difficult emotions, but she eventually describes the situation clearly.
Y’all help this sweet woman out by bringing her situation to light with the authorities who can assist the fire department and fire chief in how these fires originated. We may have been attacked by a foreign actor.
Patriots, push out this information wide and far. This was a great service and the doctors very helpful in answering all of Betsy and Thomas’ questions. The docs were very understanding of folks wanting to protect themselves during these times.
You must circulate this vital info wide and far so that we can protect our “troops>’
Be prepared to have your N.W.O. brainwashing triggered re. the anchor baby question. The subject is off limits for you because that is part of your programming. That is why you have such violent emotional reactions on certain topics, and reject all rational, factual conversation on certain subjects the Tavistock people have determined they need to make you join their side whenever the dog whistle is blown. They have been refining these Tavistock Institute mind control techniques for over 100 years. You aren’t alone.
Push through. You can do it!
There is no such blanket law saying all babies born in the U.S. to foreign parents are automatically citizens.
The test of such citizenship is fact specific and the U.S. Supreme Court established a test in Wong to determine the critical issues of jurisdiction, residence and domicile, along with several other prohibitions, one being a parent being subject to a foreign power, which hindsight shows that Kamala’s U.N. One-World Order father Donald was and still is.
The primary questions in Kamala Harris’ citizenship as having been born of non-US-citizen parents (absent later evidence of naturalization, which she has not provided).
Since her father’s citizenship governs such matters in U.S. law, for certain, the Jamaican Constitution defines her as Jamaican.
Now, the question is whether she also qualifies as a citizen under U.S. law at the time of birth.
Michael Voris mistakenly calls Obama black in the video below. Obama is not black. Never was. Indonesian dude – also not qualified for president but SCUMBAG Roberts who gives his allegiance to the Knights of Malta, not the United States, gave him the all-clear to hold the office.
Y’all know that the gallows can hold many traitors? Just line ’em up. Noose ’em up. Drop and haul away. Next line. No different than the 4.5 MILLION people Susan Rice had murdered in the Congo, Sudan, Libya, and Somalia. What? Rice’s life is worth more than anyone of those she murdered?
Traitors need to spend some time in the spiritual world reflecting on their past life mistakes here on Earth, from the Rothschilds to the Clintons to ‘the lovers Strzok and Page. They all need to leave Earth now. Perhaps the new space force can help us ‘off-world’ these criminals. They have not been good citizens of our planet. After their “time out”, we welcome them back into their next incarnation where they will be able to make amends to all they have harmed. For Clinton and Rice, that will be a lot of incarnations! Get busy, girls. You have a lot of karma to rectify!
What we have here, folks, is an ILLEGAL ALIEN interfering with our election (see meme below). Foreign interference in the 2020 election. Make sure to contact Mike Pompeo to test him and see if he is a TRAITOR or a PATRIOT.
Bundle up our articles with documentation and citations to show that Kamala Harris is not an American citizen. She is posing as a citizen which is immigration fraud. Furthermore, she must be immediately removed from the Senate because her immigration status is a threat to national security. Put Mike Pompeo on the job, patriots. Let’s see what he does. Remember, as Secretary of State he can fast-track her deportation. But as an SES traitor, he will protect the foreign interloper – Kamala Harris.
‘furtive’ noticed and posted:
Fox News Bret Baier just repeated the BIG LIE:
“Kamala was born in California and she’s a Natural Born Citizen, an all that…anyway who is running Trump’s campaign?”
Another ignoramus afraid to buck his boss.
“ all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.” (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 1639 (1862))
Kamala’s birth parents had allegiances to foreign nations – Jamaica and India. Again, reminding you that her birth father indicated that his race was Jamaican, not African American or Black. Phony Kamala, from head to toe, from birth to present day.
These sites are correctly citing the 14th Amendment, but then incorrectly concluding the meaning of the Constitution on this point of citizenship based on their emotional politics rather than the long precedent.
It takes a leap of logic to interpret the 13th Amendment to allow for citizenship by arguing that a newborn baby is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. at birth merely by virtual of his or her presence in the U.S.
U.S. Senator Kamala Harris must be arrested and deported immediately for immigration fraud.
Harris was born Oct. 20, 1964. At the time of her birth, her father Donald Jasper Harris, was a citizen of Jamaica, and her mother Gopalan Shyamala, was a citizen of India. Therefore, the laws of both Jamaica and India are clear: Kamala Harris was either a citizen of Jamaica, pursuant to Section 3C(b) of the Constitution of Jamaica, or a citizen of India, pursuant to Part II, Sec. 5 of the Constitution of India.