Vaccinated Zombies will Kill Off Humanity

Post by Jim Stone

STAY AWAY FROM THE VAXXED, IT IS OFFICIAL, FROM PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS

.


I am so scared by this my brain is jamming and I am not coding right. I am fixing the coding errors now.

Download from original source

https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf

Download from my server

http://82.221.129.208/pfizervax.pdf

THE ELITE HAVE ALREADY FFED OFF TO THEIR HIDEOUTS, THEY HAVE RELEASED THE GENOCIDE

READ IT AND WEEP, WE ARE EFFED. PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS STATE BOTH INHALATION AND SKIN CONTACT WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UNVACCINATED

.
Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:

1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.
2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: have babies that have cognitive difficulties.

This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:

8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer safety within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”

TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.

THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.

Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.
Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.

Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:
Terms:
Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy

8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.

8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.


If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting? If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?


That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.

The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy).

* If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention.

* If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome. The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form. In the case of a live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported). Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows:

* Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;

* Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify developmental delays). In the case of paternal exposure, the investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator must document in the source documents that the participant was given the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner.

8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:

* A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.

* A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.
Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:

8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.

I WILL TRANSLATE THAT TO ENGLISH:

An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer safety within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.

My comment: This is why we have green screen Biden. They are ALL green screen now, we just caught Biden. They are green screen and working from sets because they have opened Pandora’s box and intend to hide out until everything is finished. This is why many people are claiming the white house is empty and that they are working from a set ad are not actually there. Because they are not there. If they do ever go on camera, they are not where they say they are.
India is having their disaster happen now because they started with the vaxxes first, and have more people vaxxed than any other country.

.

VIDEO David Icke and Celest Solum – Your body becomes a bio-reactor with these zombie bioweapons.

.

.

Listen to Clif High describe vaxxidents in this video: VAXXXIDENTS – EXPLORERS’ GUIDE TO SCIFI WORLD

.

5 thoughts on “Vaccinated Zombies will Kill Off Humanity”

  1. Revelation 21:8 “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.”
    Check out that word sorcerers it is Pharmakeia in the Greek manuscript. They’re trying to kill 😢 God’s children through or medical establishment

  2. Interesting predictions. Fear around every corner now, most all news, almost an epidemic in itself. Ask yourself, where does this shedding conjecture lead? First thought is how can we, the unvaxxed keep our distance from the vaxxed? Of course we would have to mark them. Unless they end up with visible signs like rashes or other reactions. So this leads the unvaxxed to side with the main agenda of the globalist. Back to the mark, the mark that will ensure one’s safety from another. Be it vaxxed or unvaxxed or any other myriad of possible risks that another human may be to oneself. Are we looking at a world in which before interacting in any situation, the fearful will use their cellphones to scan the area for threats to oneself. Sounds very much akin to the social credit scoring we now see in the CCP.
    The fear factor. Having to had to strap my toolbelt back on and return to interacting in commerce to make ends meet, doing so maskless, the fear of a anti masker in the public square is obvious. A masker will avoid an anti masker like the plague, giving credence to how much fear has been induced into the general public over their fear of others. With these latest allegations over fear of the vaxxed or unvaxxed, are the general populace being primed to accept the mark, the software app that scans the vicinity for any threat, demanding all people be databased into the cloud, so that any interaction can be precipitated with a virtual scan of anothers mark, you know, to be safe. We are not but a step or two away from this scenario unfolding. Technology wise, we are there, the information arena, they have it all, all they need do combine and associate with a mark or even with facial recognition add in a smartphone app and we’re there.. In almost every article, news story, TV show, the underlying thread is fear, this fear is reaching a crescendo where everything and everyone is viewed as a possible threat, where the fearful must take every precaution to protect themselves
    How far will this fear of everything drive people? Cowering in their homes, masking if they have to leave, distancing themselves from each other, avoiding any venue that is not guaranteeing their safety and security. This didn’t just start, it started so long ago, it started with drivers licensing and requiring identification, and now we are at the point, to fly on a plane, to enter a public venue, go into a courthouse, one must have all I’s dotted T’s crossed, have your bags and body scanned and searched before entering. So to assume that the progression of living in this fear based existence, the ability of being able to identify any possible threat to our safety in any activity or in the company of others is not on the horizon would be a mistake. After all a scared subject is much easier to control than one who has no fear. I guess when people lost faith that their God would protect them, they turned to government and technology. When does it end? Two possible scenarios, live in Faith or live in Fear. At this moment in time fear has the lead.

    1. We choose to live in faith with precautions to protect ourselves in reasonable ways. We are witnessing the destruction of our social order, but are hopeful for the way we reorganize ourselves in the future.

      1. You know i think you are very special people, my comment was not at all directed towards you. Of course we must do what we can to prepare and protect ourselves. However my comment was an observation of how fear is being used as a weapon of control, confusion and obfuscation. And it’s working, the fear outside of our domain has reached epidemic proportions most normies haven’t a clue as to what’s happening in our world, and what has happened. The author of this post paints a very bleak future, adding to the fear.
        On the flip side, l will always believe I will be here and survive any and all onslaughts if my Creator wills it. I can not imagine the magnificence of our Creator, yet see a glimpse of it through his creation, i know in this manifestation my abilities are limited and a veil placed between this reality and most all things outside this incarnation. Yet my heart tells me she is there, watching, cheering us on, protecting us. If the predictions of this Vax come to pass, there will be much suffering. Our services to our fellow travels will be in dire need to help them to cross the threshold, physically and mentally and I intend to help trusting in her. We, our group all coming together as we have, is no mere coincidence. She has a purpose for us. Listen to your heart, it will tell you.

Leave a Reply to Ron Spence Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *