What do a genital-urology surgeon named BANGS,* the Y architect, a “Christian socialist” and three Robber barons, including JP Morgan and Cornelius Vanderbilt, have in common? * you cannot make this stuff up
Cornelius Vanderbilt, shadow vice president; treasurer; steamship, railroad monopolies; Manhattan real estate; Grand Central; chairman, audit committee (1875)
Robert R. McBurney (from 1862), corresponding secretary; architect; designed the first YMCA building in 1870; one of his biographers wrote that McBurney’s influence on the YMCA movement was “profound, exceeding that of any other man.”; founding trustee, The YMCA School for Christian Workers (1884-99, where basketball was first played); see archives; biography (1902, “model of the the association architecture of the future” entrance, reading room, private office, recreation room, parlors, lecture rooms, gymnasium, “abundant” bath-rooms, swimming pool, bowling alleys, library, class-rooms, auditorium); member, Committee for the Suppression of Vice; proponent of “Christian socialism” in Europe; d. 1898 age 67, Bishop Henry C. Potter eulogized (later was first president of the Pilgrims Society of America)
J. Pierpont Morgan, treasurer; Lord Rothschild, George Peabody protégé; co-founder of the British Pilgrims Society (1902); purchased editorial control of American newspapers for the Pilgrims propaganda (1912); notorious homosexual
In the previous Part 1 of this journey, we found that our present money system has become an unworkable corruption of an initially sound concept to enable exchange of goods or services for reliable “value token” notes, issued by banks.
We set out the requirements for a sound system, and highlighted 3 ways that banks had gamed and corrupted these sound principles for their own benefit resulting in the mess we experience today.
However, to return to a functional mechanism is not possible at the mere flick of a switch, with the corruption so ingrained and globally spread.
We need to start with a list of issues that need to be covered in the reversion process:
1. As the present system has evolved to benefit those who run it, there will be much in-house resistance to any change which removes those benefits.
2. Any new system restarting from sound practice must be able to evolve ALONGSIDE the current, and interact with it as necessary in the interim.
3. This will unavoidably involve greater complexity in the transition period, with the public needing to see clear immediate benefits to them overriding the upset of change.
4. Established law is built around the present structure, and so any new privately promoted “token” medium would have to be a form of cryptocurrency.
5. Not only sound and secure in itself, the mechanism would have not to detract from value invested in the current system, before it establishes itself.
6. The new development must be able to develop from a “standing start” through public approval and choice.
The following is a suggested start for consideration and debate:
Owner occupied property offers the basis for secure, stable cryptocurrency to be created by those owners, using the property market value as collateral.
Property ownership, property value, property insurance, and financial charges against property can all be recorded and verified, with blockchain security protection, and be updated as and when any of these items changes.
This secure technology* therefore now allows the potential for individual owners of property to secure and create transferable credit for themselves based on this value, in cryptocurrency units corresponding to conventional credit units, as (say) “property dollars”….” property pounds” etc.
As a starting point, it would be prudent to have an initial fixed ceiling to the creation of such crypto units of (say) 50% of the recorded market value of any property, in order to allow people to become accustomed to the concept, and practical process, in a demonstrably safe financial environment, not pushing the market valuation at any time to the extreme.
The cryptocurrency recording, and associated 50% cap, would be a blockchained entry on any specific property record, available for the owner to use and manage, or ignore if he or she wished. A dormant, or active resource at the discretion of the owner.
Once an owner had found another property owner with whom he had agreed a deal for the transfer of goods using the cryptocurrency, he would transfer the currency from his account over to the goods supplier’s account in the normal way, with blockchain security, so that now the goods supplier’s account showed he could “spend” more than his 50% property value, and the goods recipient’s account would show he had a corresponding amount less than his 50% value in his remaining account.
And so on……
The only further mechanism to consider is the arrangements to cover the eventual sale of the property, either by owner’s decision, or death.
When the property is transferred between owners, the transferor will either have the crypto account in it’s original balance, or in credit, or deficit with reference to it’s original balance.
If in original balance, the sale and transfer can be made entirely in the conventional way and the transferee will pay in full with conventional funding.
If there is a deficit on the original balance, then that deficit is transferred to the new owner, with that new owner having the benefit of a corresponding reduction in the amount he has to pay in conventional funding. The deficit remains until such time as he may return the crypto account to full original balance.
If in credit relative to the original balance, the transferor can transfer the credit amount to any new property crypto account he is buying. If he is not buying another property, he will have to transfer to another chosen property owner’s account, or let the credit remain for the benefit of the transferee.
These same options will apply to the property at death of the owner, or be subject to his Will provisions.
Under no circumstances will cryptocurrency credit or deficit numbers appear, or disappear, without a corresponding opposing deficit, or credit balance also occurring in the system in a naturally functioning way.
Those wishing to trade in this way would need person to person trading platforms, similar to Ebay or Gumtree to have the option to trade using the cryptocurrency, initially with their commission in conventional currency.
Clearly, once established and showing it’s benefits to trading parties, consideration could be given to raising the value limit percentage, in an organised review of the overall system rules.
With time and the accepted use of this means of exchange, housebuilders would have the opportunity to pay for building work in cryptocurrency, using any developing property value and applying the 50% rule.
Checking this Proposition Against the Original 6 Criteria Points Above
1. The only interaction with the present system is the potential reduction in conventional money where a property is sold with net cryptocurrency deficit. Existing banking business would otherwise be unaffected.
2.See 1. above – this mechanism can work entirely separately to the existing.
3. Initial buyers would be unfazed by a corresponding “loss” on future property sale, in order to have instant hassle-free goods or services. Initial sellers would have every confidence they could buy something with their crptocurrency “surplus” in due course.
4. Other private cryptocurrencies have emerged and thrived within the framework of law – this cryptocurrency has the added advantage of security against property value.
5. See 1. above. No problem here.
6. Time will tell, but once started there is no reason that this development shouldn’t go from strength to strength, allowing the raising of the 50% limit after time, if, and as needed.
Note from the Anonymous Patriots:
The asterisk * is because the American Intelligence Media has reported that BLOCKCHAIN technology is not secure at this time. There are ways to make it secure, but until the United States Patent Office is purged of British and foreign control, the engineers who have developed the new, very secure encryption system are not interested in offering their product for use. Personally, we would not digitize any of our assets, like property or wealth, on the blockchain until this encryption was included in the existing or new system. In the reports below, we busted Bitcoin as a CIA operation – and definitely NOT secure.
Money is a “token of value” invented to bridge any value asymmetry in an exchange of goods or services.
In any exchange of goods or services it is highly unlikely that the exchanging parties will each have exactly the same value to offer the other at the time, to create an entirely balanced barter deal.
Indeed, most exchanges are entirely in one direction, where goods or services are wanted by one party from the other, with no compensating value transfer.
To offset this value exchange imbalance a mechanism was developed to “store” real durable wealth (gold, silver, etc.) at a bank for safekeeping, and use banks “notes of value” receipts arising therefrom as “value tokens” which could effectively transfer ownership of some of that stored value to another in exchange for goods or services wanted.
So, we have banks reliably storing durable valuables deposited with them, the value receipts from which can act as transferable value tokens by the owner/depositor acceptable to another in exchange for real goods or services.
Clearly any time the owner/depositor wishes to remove his deposited valuables, he would have to return the full amount of bank tokens he had “spent” for the bank to cancel these notes, and entirely clear the deposit from their records.
With all banks working to a similar process, and with co-ordinated value token notes, it becomes possible for unrelated transactions to exchange value notes, from different banks, to have the same ability to redeem and complete any return of deposited wealth.
Over time, insured property was added to gold and silver as a reliable source of stored wealth, and money as an entirely paper-based concept was born.
A Great Idea – Corrupted by Greed
So, by this means, banks became middlemen controlling the safekeeping of deposited valuables, and created and transferred their paper “value notes” to and between depositors, enabling the flow of goods and services in otherwise unbalanced or one-way transfers.
This all worked accountably and reliably provided the value tokens issued always related to the value stored, and if any depositor of valuables with the bank wished to repossess them, he would have to return value notes to the bank equal to those he had spent against the security of the valuables, for the bank to cancel them and return the actual valuables.
However, rather than sticking within the constraints inherent in this understandable and reliable system, banks saw an opportunity to game the process in their favour.
Firstly, they realised that their paper “value notes” were constantly in demand as essential to the process of any exchange of goods or services, so rather than charge a fee for any work they actually did, they charged a small percentage continuously on the notes they issued.
Secondly, rather than this percentage being on the original notes only, they applied it to the additional notes needed as “interest” on the original notes also.
This “compound interest” payable to them had to be created against the continual devaluing of the notes against the deposited collateral value, a process we call “inflation”.
Thirdly, they noticed that most of the real value collateral deposited with them was not reclaimed over considerable periods of time, offering them the possibility of creating more “value notes” than they actually held in collateral value, allowing them to expand their business, albeit in a manner putting the whole money creation process into irredeemable risk and chaos.
To cover up the clear fraud of issuing more value notes than they had valuables in collateral, they created a book keeping process based on a lie, that the wealth they held was the value notes rather than the collateral valuables.
Thus, they created loans from these notes entirely independent of any collateral value they held.
Fraudulently accounting for “loans” being created by bank value notes (in the possession of depositors) being temporarily lent to borrowers, banks freed themselves to CREATE as many loans as they felt they could get away with, always assured that the resulting deposits would balance in their book keeping.
As further consolidation of this fraud, they paid “interest” to bank note depositors, reinforcing the false impression that deposited bank notes were “lent” to borrowers, rather than the opposite TRUTH that their loans (created by them at will) created deposits.
This true money creation process is set out and confirmed by Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin Q1 2014, entitled “Money Creation in the Modern Economy”. In this Bulletin, and to quote “…rather than lending out deposits that are placed with them, the act of lending creates deposits – THE REVERSE OF THE SEQUENCE TYPICALLY DESCRIBED IN TEXTBOOKS….” (capitals added by me for emphasis only).
When challenged as to why banks still charged interest from borrowers which they paid to depositors, when it was not depositors money that they lent, the Bank of England replied that the morality of commercial bank practices was not their responsibility.
The real value they held, namely deposited collateral real value, became ignored in their accounting.
The Way Back to Functional Reality
In order to restore an understandable and workable system, we must return to the point where real valuables are “deposited” with banks, and bank “value notes” are only issued to these collateral depositors to the limit of real value held.
This ensures that there is a direct accountability between each depositor of real collateral value, and the money he creates against that value.
Banks would account real deposit value held against money issued for each depositor, such that in the event that the money was not returned for cancellation by the bank, by the depositor, the collateral could be sold by the bank to retrieve the money that way.
All safe and secure.
Banks would act as professional book keepers and would charge competitive fees for any activity they perform, with no “interest” involved in any activity.
Real value offered as collateral for banks to create money against can be any durable valuable, traditionally gold and silver, but clearly insured property holds value in the marketplace, and as an essential component of life for most, and with it’s potential for adding value to itself, it is collateral of choice for most.
Now that the ownership and current value of property can be secured for all to rely on via blockchain technology, we have an ideal medium and mechanism for any property owner to register how much money he has created against the value of that property, entirely free of “interest”, with that charge against that particular property at any time being secured, to be removed as part of the eventual sale of that property in due course.
Thus the concepts of “mortgage” and “equity release” become merged in one secure account unpolluted by any notion of interest.
Each homeowner has his own stable and secure banking system in the varying equity he decides to invest in his home.
Indeed, there is no theoretical reason preventing the development of property via the creation of money from the developing value itself, i.e. provided the developing market value always runs ahead of the money created to construct it, the property can just remain with the money needed to construct it as a charge awaiting cancellation at the sale of the property.
Banking would thus become secure and paid for in fees for a professional book keeping service.
Property and home ownership would be available for all.
By engaging and managing the real market value in his home, any property owner has the potential to release this value and buy it back as he needs to fund his life.
The US Geological Survey (USGS) has publicly stated that the world’s silver supply will be depleted by 2025. This will make silver the first widely used industrial commodity to have its in-ground supply exhausted.Source
After you read how important silver is in the new technologies that will control humanity, think about what happens to PRICE when SUPPLY is LIMITED!
The reason that a silver shortage would be a big problem for the Green New Deal, including the rollout of DEADLY 5G, is that SILVER is required for the technology to work.
We are asking citizens of the world to buy physical silver and get it out of the hands of the evil globalists who want to lock down the planet in digital tyranny. For example, remember our reports on the Internet of Things? It needs silver to operate.
This technology will not work unless SILVER is readily available for industrial and commercial use. The most efficient way citizens can fight this intrusive technology is to gobble up all the physical silver they can, whether it is American Silver Eagles, Australian Kangaroos, Canadian Silver Maples, South African Kruggerands, UK Britiannas, or any other form of pure silver.
We don’t see a down side to this at all! Silver is not only valuable as a store of value, its price is never going to go down, except in the rigged SLV markets where silver is imaginary, not real.
Citizens around the world are waking up to the VALUE of SILVER. Dealers can’t seem to scarf up American Eagles anywhere. So try other ’rounds’, from other countries, or pure silver bars from a reputable dealer.
Another great place to look for silver is in pawn, second-hand and antique shops. Many times shopkeepers are unaware that they have a valuable metal in utensils, silverware, tea sets, and jewelry. Sterling silver is an alloy of silver containing 92.5% by weight of silver. It can be melted down and purified by silver professionals who will buy it at coin and pawn shops – for just that purpose.
In this industry publication – Silver Institute Paper, you will see that silver is REQUIRED for 5G manufacturing.
What do you think will happen to the price of physical silver when the SUPPLY is short and the DEMAND is long? Yes, the silver you buy in the physical form is going to have an “up charge”. Get used to it as this is reflective of the real price of silver, not that imaginary stuff over at SLV that is used to set the price of physical silver.
Read under these headline links for edgy memes and informative videos to circulate in your downline:
This ZH article is worth the read time as it will remind you about the DTCC and its role in clearing stocks. Then drop below to the next headline and remind yourself of what you learned with our 2016 article on the EXCHANGES.
“Because the buyer does not know who the seller is, the brokers for both buyer & seller use a 3rd company called DTCC to actually match & “clear” stock transactions, moving title from selling broker to buying broker while ensuring proceeds are moved on time.
For equity options contracts (puts and calls), the primary clearing entity is OCC (Options Clearing Corp). I’m going to refer to “DTCC” below, but know that the same story can be told for options with OTC.
Clearing for US equities is generally a “T+2” process: settlement takes no more than 2 days from the trade. But the Buyer’s & Seller’s brokerage accounts generally reflect the transaction immediately – behind the scenes, there is lending. Lending means “counterparty credit risk.”
DTCC provides its balance sheet to guarantee settlement. But its balance sheet isn’t that big, so it has to tightly manage counterparty risk to guarantee accurate settlement.
In this way, DTCC is both a central repository for Title, and also the guarantor of Title.
This guarantee is typically an extremely low risk proposition.
However, “low risk” does not equal “no risk””
Students in the AIM School of Truth learned about these exchanges in a lesson plan of August 19, 2016. If you were not a student at that time, this is a must-read. If you need a refresher, by all means drop in and reboot.
Are You Ready to Be Ripped Off in the Biggest Financial Scam Ever?
We began the article: “You have heard that the stock market and Wall Street are nothing but a casino. “Outright gambling” you have heard or read. You may think you know what that means, but we urge you to read this article to see how deep we went to uncover the truth for Patriots.
Once you read this article, there is no going back to sleep. You will want to act to preserve your savings before the collapse happens. Our markets are no different than all that proceeded us in history: Fiat currency always ends the same way—total collapse. As we have told you before, we are not financial analysts and aren’t giving you financial advice. We are just outlining what our research discovered and are saying in a calm voice to our fellow Patriots, “Fire. There is a fire in the casino and you might want to cash out your chips and head to the exit door. Immediately.”
You probably have a sinking feeling in your stomach about what is happening in the global financial world. It doesn’t seem to make sense. You read that the U.S. stock market is hitting all-time highs, yet you hear that exchanges around the world are faltering. Why are we told that stocks are at record highs and volume in trading is strong, but that no one is buying? That just doesn’t make sense. Why are we hearing about the robust health of the “markets,” yet seeing more and more unemployment in our community?”
In a series of tweets on Friday, the iconic investor and “shark” compared the lending and rebate payment mechanism in stocks vs DeFi crypto tokens (where the bearer gets the benefit of the borrow fee and not the broker) and said – in an almost verbatim paraphrase of our “tricky” tweet from two days earlier – the following:
“one trick that I have been on both sides of is to lend out stock to shorts at a high APY and then call back my shares, which forces the short to cover. Now if #WSB did this en masse, it would be the mother of all short squeezes “.
But if they do, one trick that I have been on both sides of is to lend out stock to shorts at a high APY and then call back my shares, which forces the short to cover. Now if #WSB did this en masse, it would be the mother of all short squeezes . — Mark Cuban (@mcuban) January 29, 2021
Ben does a great job giving an overview of the Robinhood-GME-Citadel predicament. View it yourself and make sure your downline gets a copy of the link. Then see how you can easy and affordable it is to get your memes on a billboard.
The next tier of “sleepy-heads” wakes up from the mirage and are very upset. It was all a game and they were the pawns.
Patriots are placing 3D memes (billboards) around their cities and communities. Inside this link, you will see suggested designs, how to do it, how much it costs. DIY, crowdsource the project, Go Fund Me. Learn here.
Some of you might be concerned about your investments in the stock market, especially if they are retirement accounts and you do not have years and years to make a mistake and rebound. IN side the link below, citizens have helpful suggestions.
Yes, we agree with Bix that physical silver is the only silver that has value, but our strategy of jumping in to the SLV (paper, derivative silver) is to drive the digital (rigged) price up and make money all the way to the Moon. SLV shares are casino chips, so to speak, and only worth money when you cash out where it is converted to fake, fiat Federal Reserve currency which will soon be worth nothing. To buy real wealth, take those fiat dollars and buy precious metals from the local coin or pawn shop, or purchase real assets like cars, boats and houses, or grab those essentials that you might need for your household.
Of course, if you have been in the AIM School of Truth for a few years, you know all about JP Morgan, metals rigging, and the secret power of the silver bullet. Here are two reports from our archive that will give you the history of what’s been going on in the silver and banking industries.
“J. P. Morgan Chase is an agent of the Rothschilds and controls the media and metals market. This post with GROUNDBREAKING new evidence from historical records shows the Rothschild plan to control American media and metals market.”
“Thanks to the banking cabal, the price of silver and gold has been suppressed for over one hundred years in order to cover up their financial crimes to humanity and suppress the real value of currencies around the world. This means that Patriots can still pick up an ounce for less than twenty fiat dollars! This is REAL U.S. minted currency and will be important to have on hand as the derivatives market collapses the entire financial system as the banksters find out that we will not be bailing them out of their Ponzi scheme this time.”
It’s not going to be a CIVIL WAR with bullets and blood; it’s going to be a SILVER WAR with naked shorts and a rich middle class.
Be a patriot and do something to contribute to the SILVER WAR efforts. Go to the coin or pawn shop today/tomorrow and load up on real silver and gold… or join silver warriors who are speculating in the SLV market to drive prices of silver to the moon, knowing that if it suddenly collapses, we could lose everything but at least we saved our children from global tyranny because we would have collapsed their evil system.
“An interesting intersection of dynamics has led to the curtain being ripped aside by the democratized speculations of WallStreetBets, a crowdsourced pool of speculative capital which shares many characteristics with online gaming and live-action role playing (LARP) only the gains and losses are in real dollars (the fortunes made and lost in GameStop (GME) are very real indeed).
Wall Street and the politicos who profiteer as insiders are naturally horrified by both developments.”
The factual events underpinning this version of American history are drawn from conventional history books, expository articles, and personal diaries. References are provided below. The difference between this telling and the history taught in American public schools is that the intentions of the actors described herein are more logical to the facts.
The facts suggest that it was the Crown itself that organized and financed Washington’s Continental Army. Without the Crown’s support there would be no US Federal Government and no Rothschild Central Bank in America today. Corrupt Federal Governments and Central Banks are how the Crown controls and enslaves its colonies. This article outlines how the Crown executed its plans to give the American Colonies the false impression of independence whilst maintaining control through a newly established, corrupt Federal Government, a Constitution that agents of the Crown drafted, and soon enough, a foreign-owned Central Bank.
The Actual War
In 1778 France and England declared war. This war is called the Bourbon War in Britain and the Anglo-French War in France. The beleaguered and bankrupt King Louis the XVI went all in on this war. Sadly it was a war that he would soon lose. Louis XVI would be the last king of France and he would pay for his defeat with his head. Americans are still paying for his defeat thanks to fiat debt enslavement. Louie’s failure ushers in the French Revolution; another British masterpiece of skullduggery, and gives birth to the French Republic under Napoleon.
British King George III was only just beginning to apply the Crown formula of divide and conquer among England’s commodity-rich colonies scattered about the world. The Crown’s enduring global domination can be directly attributed first and foremost to its central banking scheme; secondly to its Hegelian political deceptions, and thirdly to its advanced weaponry obtained through intellectual property theft.
Key Players Set the Trap
In 1778, American “Ambassador” Benjamin Franklin was living high with Marie Antionette and Louis in the palace at Versailles. In return for King George’s many indulgences and gifts, Franklin negotiated disadvantageous terms for the Colonies in every treaty he negotiated. In 1778, Franklin’s mission at Versailles was to convince King Louis XVI to participate in the American revolution. Franklin’s stay at Versailles was bankrolled by agents of King George III. Living descendants of first-hand witnesses attest to Franklin’s clandestine meetings with Crown agents at Montreal’s Hôtel Pierre du Calvet. This author has stayed in the same room Franklin used for his secret meetings.
The photo above shows hundreds of skeletons unearthed in Franklin’s London townhouse basement. These tiny tortured skeletons were found during the 1998 renovations of Franklin’s London townhome; the home provided to Franklin by the Crown. Was Franklin a practicing Satanist in addition to being a loyal servant of the Crown?
After George Washington’s fake 1776 “victory” at Trenton, Franklin was finally able to get a deal with Louis XVI whereby France would extend the Colonists credits with which to “pay” for French mercenary soldiers, war material, and the naval harassment of British ships. In return, the Colonists were to keep Britain bogged down while France assembled a naval fleet for the invasion of the Crown’s super-rich sugar colony, Jamaica. Remember, all wars are commodity wars.
Louis XVI was being systematically deceived into believing that his navy and marines could wrest the rich sugar colony from the Crown. If France’s Jamaican attack had been successful, it would have diverted about 20 percent of King George’s free cash flow directly into Louis’s near-empty coffers. Louis took the bait and the British trap was set.
Propping up Washington and His Continental Army
By 1777 Britain was well along in implementing its plans to “lose” the unprofitable American Colonies whilst at the same time deceive Louis XVI into believing his warships and naval tactics were superior to those of the British navy. This was not an easy thing to accomplish because Washington’s Army was even more tattered than the rotting barnacle-encrusted hulls of the French warships.
The only real problem the British ever faced in the Colonies were the highly effective independent militias that were kicking British and Hessian asses all up and down the coastline. These guerrilla attacks changed the minimal cash flow coming in from the American Colonies into annual losses. Had Washington’s Continental Army fallen apart as expected in January of 1777, the independent militias would have gained more power and the British plans to exit without loss of control would likely have been set back several decades.
It became essential for the Crown to step in to maintain the impression of a viable Continental American army so the Crown would have a single corrupt counterparty to negotiate peace terms with. In the winter of 1776-77, the only way to accomplish that was for the Crown to feed, clothe, and pay the ragtag Continental Army as quickly as possible. This explains why thousands of new leather boots, woolen garments, tons of food, booze, cash money, and gunpowder were all stockpiled and left practically unguarded for the Americans to take in Trenton, New Jersey on December 26, 1776.
Not a single American died in the fake Battle of Trenton. Most of the 22 Hessian casualties were officers because, well, dead men tell no tales. Autopsies may likely reveal the Hessian officers were shot in the back by pissed-off Hessian mercenaries who must have quickly realized just why their sentries and guard posts had been recalled the night before, and why the report of an approaching rebel force was ignored by their commander.
After feeding, paying, and clothing his ragged Continental Army with the loot that British General Howe had so kindly stockpiled in Trenton, Washington set about thwarting French Marquis de Lafayette’s efforts to attack the British at their weakest points. Instead of actually fighting the British, Washington only begged the French king for more credits with which to “pay” for more materials and naval harassment of British ships. Washington also kept himself busy working on fake plans to not attack New York City. It seems that General Washington never attacked anywhere that he wasn’t invited to attack. The few successful Colonial attacks, such as the Battle of Saratoga, were led by militiamen under the command of local Patriot heroes – the kind of men Washington was put in place to undermine.
Faking Not One But Two Critical Defeats
By 1780, the British plans were in the final stage and Lord Cornwallis was ready to pretend to lose the ground war to Lafayette and the French mercenaries. Oh right, George Washington was there too. The place chosen for this was Yorktown, a desolate location that is practically good for nothing even to this day. Despite the narcissism of Americans, this British false flag was entirely orchestrated for the benefit of King Louis XVI. The purpose of the fake defeat at Yorktown was to suck Louis further into the British trap – a trap that would ultimately cost Louis and his young wife Marie their heads.
The fake British defeat at Yorktown gave Louis XVI the impression that his French army and navy had beaten the British army and navy at the Battles of Yorktown and the Chesapeake. In fact, the two battles were complete farces. Cornwallis purposefully positioned his fort on the wrong side of the river to make it easy for the French mercenaries to drop mortar rounds on top of it. The British warships sent from New York to engage the French blockade purposefully avoided sinking any French ships and then, inexplicably “ran away” back to New York.
The French warships were loitering in the Chesapeake, just off Yorktown, with their meters running-up charges the Colonists would soon regret having incurred. The French ships were there to blockade Lord Cornwallis from receiving British resupply from the sea. On the morning of September 5, 1781, the French ships were caught completely unaware and at anchor by multiple British warships that had come down from New York. Instead of sinking the French warships as they lay defenseless at anchor, British Commander Thomas Graves ordered his warships back out to open sea, giving French Admiral Compte de Grasse four hours to onboard his sailors; weigh anchors, and set out to engage the, oh so very kind British.
The Battle of the Chesapeake was short and indecisive. After a couple of hours, the British “escaped” to the north. The French did not pursue. Why? Because their old ships were 20 percent slower than the newer British ships. At Yorktown, it was made to appear as if the French had defeated the British both on land and at sea. No historian can explain these things logically and so a wide variety of unsatisfying excuses are given instead. How were the vastly superior British army and navy both defeated at Yorktown? The logical answer is that they were not defeated. The battles were pantomimes and part of a trap designed to entice King Louis XVI further along in his plan to invade Jamaica to take the Crown’s super-rich sugar plantation away from King George III.
The Set Up is Complete
Following the false “victories” at Yorktown, French Admiral Compte de Grasse sailed his rotting French fleet back to the Caribbean to prepare for the coming invasion of Jamaica. Meanwhile, the Crown moved ahead with its plans to establish a controlled Continental Congress that would ratify a Constitution that would enable a Rothschild central bank. Crown loyalists including Hamilton, Adams, and others were paid to prepare competing (Hegelian dialectic) drafts of an American Constitution. The final document would give the impression of being hard fought for through heated debate but in truth the final Constitution enabled the Crown’s plans.
Fake Battles – Fake Treaties
Regardless of what has been reported about the peace treaties, the Crown gave away nothing, and it did not surrender after Yorktown. None of the several treaties that were signed ever required the Crown to abandon any of its rights, claims, and properties within the 13 Colonies. What actually happened was Crown loyalists Franklin and Lee negotiated America’s conditional surrender to the Crown. The American’s conditional surrender is made clear in the first Treaty of Paris, a document that simply altered the form of the Crown’s dominion over the 13 Colonies. The only thing the American Colonists actually “won” were some off-season whaling concessions along the coast of Greenland. For his bungling performance, George Washington was rewarded with King George’s personal commendation and support for becoming America’s first President.
Instead of multiple policed territories, the newly united states became a federally managed, semi-autonomous tax farm. The Treaty of Paris transferred the Crown’s costs to police the colonies to the colonists, and within just a few years the Crown’s investment in the colonies was returned to marginal profitability. Remember, the only valuable commodity coming out of America at that time was tobacco. The cotton gin wasn’t invented until 1794 and despite efforts to find it, there was almost no gold or silver.
The Real Battle Royale
Seven months after Admiral Compte de Grasse’s “victory” in the Battle of the Chesapeake, the French and British fleets met in the Caribbean in what is known as the great Battle of the Saintes. Compte de Grasse suffered a humiliating defeat. This time it was British Admiral Rodney who literally sailed circles around the slower French warships, pounding them with cannon fire from all directions. The absolute French defeat at the Saintes marked the end of Louis XVI’s reign, and the end of the French monarchy.
In surrendering to the British; along with many more of his assets, Louis XVI was required to transfer his Colonial receivables to King George. In a subsequent British-American treaty, the Colonies were forced to accept the transfer of their war debts from Louis to King George’s Crown Bank of England. With that transfer, Americans became Crown debt slaves in perpetuity.
Deception and Treachery
It was Commander Graves’ deceptive tactics at the Battle of the Chesapeake in September 1781 that tricked the French into believing their barnacle-encrusted old oaken warships had a chance of prevailing against the much newer and faster British copper-clad warships. That deception may well be the Crown’s greatest success in mind control, possibly right up there with the Crown virus of 2020, and the WTC “terrorist attack” on September 11, 2001.
Sadly for the once-again outplayed Americans, their surrender to the Crown initiated formation of a corrupt central government, a Rothschild central bank, and an insurmountable mountain of fiat national debt. It would be unfair to describe Washington, Franklin, Hamilton, Adams, and so many others as actual traitors, because there was no actual America at the time to be traitorous to. The concept of American national patriotism was another British mind game created later during the War of 1812 and specifically for the purpose of further increasing the national fiat debt.
Were There Were No Patriot Heroes?
There were a few brave and true American patriots alive at the end of the 1700s. Men like Jefferson, Stephen and Burr. These men gave us the Bill of Rights, the only American legal document that actually does protect Americans from total domination by the Crown. Until such time that Americans wake up and turn against the U.S. corporation acting in their name, the Crown will continue to rob and pillage America’s wealth.
Allison, David K; Ferreiro, Larrie D, eds. (2018). The American Revolution: A World War. Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 9781588346599.
Ayling, Stanley Edward (1972). George the Third. London: Collins.
Barros, Carolyn A.; Smith, Johanna M. (2000). Life-writings by British Women, 1660–1815: An Anthology. UPNE. ISBN 978-1-55553-432-5. Retrieved 17 February 2016.
Bemis, Samuel Flagg (2012). The Diplomacy of the American Revolution. Read Books Ltd. ISBN 9781447485155.
Berenger, Jean (1997). A History of the Habsburg Empire 1700–1918. New York: Longman. ISBN 0-582-09007-5.
Black, Jeremy (2006). George III America’s Last King. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300117325.
Blanning, Timothy (1996). The French Revolutionary Wars. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-340-56911-5.
Boromé, Joseph (January 1969). “Dominica during French Occupation, 1778–1784”. The English Historical Review. JSTOR 562321.
Chartrand, René (2006). Gibraltar 1779–83: The Great Siege. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84176-977-6. Retrieved 16 November 2015.
Colomb, Philip (1895). Naval Warfare, its Ruling Principles and Practice Historically Treated. London: W. H. Allen. OCLC 2863262.
Dull, Jonathan R (2009). The Age of the Ship of the Line: The British & French Navies, 1650–1815. Seaforth Publishing. ISBN 9781473811669.
Grainger, John D (2005). The Battle of Yorktown, 1781: A Reassessment. Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-8438-3137-2.
Greene, Jack P; Pole, J.R, eds. (2008). A Companion to the American Revolution. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780470756447.
Falkner, James (2009), Fire Over The Rock: The Great Siege of Gibraltar 1779–1783, Pen and Sword, ISBN 9781473814226
France, Kingdom of; United States of America (1788). “Treaty of Alliance”. The Avalon Project, Yale Law School. Retrieved 24 August 2020.
Glascock, Melvin Bruce (1969). “New Spain and the War for America, 1779-1783”. LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses, 1590. Louisiana State University. Retrieved 20 August 2020.
Hagan, Kenneth J (16 October 2009). “The birth of American naval strategy”. In Hagan, Kenneth J.; McMaster, Michael T; Stoker, Donald (eds.). Strategy in the American War of Independence: A Global Approach. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-21039-8.
Jackson, Kenneth T; Dunbar, David S. (2005). Empire City: New York Through the Centuries. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-2311-0909-3.
Hardman, John (2016). The Life of Louis XVI. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300220421.
Harvey, Robert (2004). A Few Bloody Noses: The American Revolutionary War. Robinson. ISBN 9781841199528.
Ketchum, Richard M (1997). Saratoga: Turning Point of America’s Revolutionary War. New York: Henry Holt. ISBN 9780805061239. OCLC 41397623. (Paperback ISBN 0-8050-6123-1)
Lavery, Brian (2009). Empire of the seas: how the navy forged the modern world. Conway. ISBN 9781844861095.
Kochin, Michael S; Taylor, Michael (2020). An Independent Empire: Diplomacy & War in the Making of the United States. University of Michigan Press. ISBN 9780472054404.
Mahan, Alfred T (1957). The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660–1783. New York: Hill and Wang.
Mahan, Alfred T (1898). Major Operations of the Royal Navy, 1762–1783: Being Chapter XXXI in The Royal Navy. A History. Boston: Little, Brown. OCLC 46778589.
Marley, David F (1998). Wars of the Americas: A Chronology of Armed Conflict in the New World, 1492 to the Present. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 9781598841008. OCLC 166373121.
Mirza, Rocky M (2007). The Rise and Fall of the American Empire: A Re-Interpretation of History, Economics and Philosophy: 1492–2006. Trafford Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4251-1383-4. Retrieved 14 November 2015.
Morris, Richard B (1983) . The Peacemakers: The Great Powers and American Independence.
Morris, Richard Brandon, ed. (1975). John Jay: The winning of the peace: unpublished papers, 1780-1784 Volume 2. Harper & Row. ISBN 9780060130480.
O’Shaughnessy, Andrew (2013). The Men Who Lost America: British Command during the Revolutionary War and the Preservation of the Empire. Oneworld Publications. ISBN 9781780742465.
Page, Anthony (2014). Britain and the Seventy Years War, 1744-1815: Enlightenment, Revolution and Empire. Macmillan International Higher Education. ISBN 9781137474438.
Pratt, Julius William (1971). A History of United States Foreign Policy. Prentice-Hall. ISBN 9780133923162.
Reeve, John (16 October 2009). “British naval strategy: war on a global scale”. In Hagan, Kenneth J; McMaster, Michael T; Stoker, Donald (eds.). Strategy in the American War of Independence: A Global Approach. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-21039-8.
Renaut, Francis P. (1922). Le Pacte de famille et l’Amérique: La politique coloniale franco-espagnole de 1760 à 1792. Paris.
Richmond, Herbert W. (1931). The Navy in India 1763–1783. London: Ernest Benn.
Rodger, Nicholas A.M. (2005). The Command of the Ocean: A Naval History of Britain, 1649–1815. New York: W.W. Norton.
Rogoziński, Jan (1999). A Brief History of the Caribbean: From the Arawak and the Carib to the Present. Facts On File. ISBN 9780816038114.
Schiff, Stacy (2005). A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America. Thorndike Press. ISBN 978-0-7862-7832-9. Retrieved 24 August 2015.
Scott, Hamish M. (1990). British Foreign Policy in the Age of the American Revolution. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-820195-3.
Simms, Brendan (2009). Three Victories and a Defeat: The Rise and Fall of the First British Empire, 1714-1783. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN 978-0-1402-8984-8.
Stockley, Andrew (1 January 2001). Britain and France at the Birth of America: The European Powers and the Peace Negotiations of 1782–1783. University of Exeter Press. ISBN 978-0-85989-615-3. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
Stone, Bailey (2014). The Anatomy of Revolution Revisited: A Comparative Analysis of England, France, and Russia. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107045729.
Syrett, David (30 June 2007). The Rodney papers: selections from the correspondence of Admiral Lord Rodney. Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-6007-1. Retrieved 16 November 2015.
Syrett, David (1998). The Royal Navy in European Waters During the American Revolutionary War. Univ of South Carolina Press. ISBN 978-1-57003-238-7.
Regan, Geoffrey (2012). Great Naval Blunders. Andre Deutsch. ISBN 978-0233003504.
Tombs, Isabelle; Tombs, Robert (2010). That Sweet Enemy: The British and the French from the Sun King to the Present. Random House. ISBN 9781446426234.
Trew, Peter (2006). Rodney and the Breaking of the Line. Pen & Sword Military. ISBN 9781844151431.
Tuchman, Barbara (1988). The First Salute: A View of the American Revolution. New York: Knopf. ISBN 0-394-55333-0.