Judge Ellis Must Recuse Himself in the Manafort Case

T.S. Ellis III is protecting the illegal NSA surveillance, including James Clapper, Loretta Lynch, … and continues to do so. This protection defies Canon 2 requiring him to avoid the appearance of impropriety in the Trump matters. Rod Rosenstein entered the case on behalf of the NSA/Clapper on appeal.

This case is an attorney feeding frenzy. The following law firms represented the plaintiffs and failed to get to first base in their arguments, other than Wikimedia’s singular arguments. Alabama Law School, Brown, Goldstein & Levy LLP, Davis Wright LLP, Fletcher Heald PLC, Ohio State Law School, Proskauer Rose LLP, Shapiro Arato LLP, Stanford Law School, Virginia Law School, Wiley Rein LLP, William Olson PC.  See District and Appeals Dockets below.

Corruption Clue: When the Deep State wants to kill a lawsuit against the surveillance state, they play on both sides of the ball. In this case, they made such poor arguments for their clients that their claims got thrown out.

Secondly, Rod Rosenstein represents the NSA, DNI, Clapper and Lynch in this defesne of the surveillance state that acted against Donald Trump.

Therefore, T.S. Ellis III MUST recuse since he already ruled once in Clapper’s and the NSA’s favor. That ruling was overturned by the 4th Circuit as flawed.

See Wikimedia Foundation et al v. National Security Agency/Central Security Service et al below. Since this NSA system was used to conduct unconstitutional surveillance on Candidate/President Donald Trump and his associates, Ellis has a duty to recuse himself immediately from the Manafort case, since the NSA system was used to spy on Manafort. In addition, Ellis’ financial holdings include numerous large Facebook underwriters and key investors: Blackrock, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, T. Rowe Price…

Thomas S. Ellis, III. (2010). Financial Disclosure. U.S. Courts.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/Ellis-III-Thomas-S-Financial-Disclosure-Report-EDV-Rembrandt-v-Facebook-for-Reporting-Year-2010.pdf

Wikimedia et al COMPLAINT, Doc. 01. (Mar. 10, 2015). Wikimedia Foundation et al v. National Security Agency/Central Security Service et al, Case Nos. 15-cv-00662-TSE (Thomas S. Ellis), 15-00662-TSE (MDDC 2015).

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2015-03-10-COMPLAINT-Doc-No-01-Wikimedia-v-NSA-15-cv-00662-TSE-Oct-23-2015.pdf

ellis 19

DOCKET. (Accessed May 09, 2018). Wikimedia Foundation et al v. National Security Agency/Central Security Service et al, Case Nos. 15-02560-TSE (Thomas S. Ellis), 15-00662-TSE (MDDC 2015).

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-05-09-DOCKET-Wikimedia-v-NSA-15-cv-00662-TSE-accessed-May-09-2018.pdf

Ellis 20

His first grant of motion to dismiss the action against the NSA on Oct. 23, 2015 was overturned at the 4th Circuit and sent back to his court for more litigation.

ellis 21.JPG

https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_v._NSA

Ellis dismissal of the case on Oct. 23, 2015 (without a trial) based on the NSA’s motion to dismiss.

MEMORANDUM OPINION. (Oct. 23, 2015). Wikimedia Foundation et al v. National Security Agency/Central Security Service et al, Case Nos. 15-02560-TSE (Thomas S. Ellis), 15-00662-TSE (MDDC 2015).

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2015-10-23-MEMORANDUM-OPINION-Doc-No-93-Wikimedia-v-NSA-15-cv-00662-TSE-Oct-23-2015.pdf

ellis 22

MEMORANDUM OPINION. (Oct. 23, 2015). Wikimedia Foundation et al v. National Security Agency/Central Security Service et al, Case Nos. 15-02560-TSE (Thomas S. Ellis), 15-00662-TSE (MDDC 2015).

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2015-10-23-MEMORANDUM-OPINION-Doc-No-93-Wikimedia-v-NSA-15-cv-00662-TSE-Oct-23-2015.pdf

ellis 23

Ellis rejected the damages citizens encounter in having to defend their privacy against an out of control NSA, despite the public diclsoures of PRISM and UPSTREAM. p.29

http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/cyberhijack/cyber-hijack-findings.html#nsa-clapper-big-lie

ellis 24.jpg

Ellis claimed separation of powers to prevent citizens from challenging the NSA’s out of control surveillance program. p. 30

ellis 25

FOUL!

On Appeal

Rod Rosenstein is defending Clapper/NSA in front of Judge Ellis on appeal, with Ellis having already ruled FOR Clapper and the NSA

APPEAL DOCKET. (Accessed May 09, 2018). Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA/CSS, Case Nos. 15-2560 (4th Cir. 2015).

ellis 26

4th CIRCUIT APPEAL OPINION OVERTURNING ELLIS AND HIS DEFENSE OF THE SURVEILLANCE STATE

APPEAL OPINION, Doc. No. 73. (May 23, 2017). Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA/CSS, Case Nos. 15-2560 (4th Cir. 2015).

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-05-09-APPEAL-OPINION-Doc-No-73-Wikimedia-v-NSA-CSS-15-2560-accessed-May-09-2018.pdf

p. 29

ellis 27

Ellis had rejected this evidence, likely the Snowden slide show below and never contested by the NSA as untrue.

ellis 28

http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/cyberhijack/cyber-hijack-findings.html#snowden

See CRIMELINE: On Jun. 06, 2013, NSA Whistleblower, Edward Snowden, revealed that most large online data services providers participate in an NSA program to sweep up all user data into NSA computers for “Big Data” analysis and data mining. The companies revealed are Microsoft (9/11/07), Yahoo (3/12/08), Google (1/14/09), Facebook (6/3/09), Paltalk (12/7/09), YouTube (9/24/10), Skype (2/6/11), AOL (3/31/11), Apple (added Oct, 2012—one year after Steve Jobs died, replaced by former IBMer Timothy D. Cooke[187] AT&T also participated.[252] [782]

Prism

How much more do we need to know? Judge T.S. Ellis III appears to be a Deep State shadow government judicial water boy.

For more intel on Judge Ellis see our articles below:

T. S. Ellis III: Wolf in sheep’s clothing?

.

Judge Ellis Lays Legal Foundation for Surveillance State, Clinton Exoneration, and Mueller’s Exit

.

Click to access 2006-01-31-Caroline-B-Click-The-trial-of-American-Jewry-obtained-May-08-2018-from-Nexis-The-Jerusalem-Post-Jan-31-2006.pdf

Ellis 32

.

Additional intel just in:

Judge T.S. Ellis III supports the C.I.A. rendition program, kicking the can back to the Executive Branch and Legislature, refusing to rule on the constitutionality of the organized torture… and made it above the law, affirming the government’s position “that damage to the national security could result if the defendants in this case were required to admit or deny El-Masri’s allegations.”

OPINION, Doc. No. 51. (May 12, 2006). Khalid El Masri v. George Tenet et al, 05-cv-01417-TSE-TRJ (Thomas S. Ellis III) (EDVA 2006).

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2006-05-12-Doc-No-51-Khaled-El-Masri-v-George-Tenet-et-al-05-cv-01417-TSE-TRJ-EDVA-May-12-2006.pdf

 Ellis 29

Ellis 30

ellis 31

 

 

2 thoughts on “Judge Ellis Must Recuse Himself in the Manafort Case”

  1. George Webb has pointed out that Mueller is making thousands of indictments of his uranium SES crime sydndicate being indicted so that when Trump is removed, they are all exonerated. So if you see 30,000 indictments, don´t fall for it. They will all be eventually be dismissed as a method to get them off the hook for their crimes, the very method you describe in your video!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHn1SrxJn6M

    Were you conned by the Q psyop? – Patriots for Truth

    https://patriots4truth.org/2018/03/30/were-you-conned-by-the-q-psyop/comment-page-1/#comment-678

    JEFF SESSIONS, MUELLER, COMEY, MCCABE, WRAY, JUDGES, FBI AGENTS, ROSENSTEIN and many others – all SES Crown Corporation agents.

    See the Bundy case – men locked up for two years with no crime, being denied rights under the Constitution, the right to chose their own lawyer, Constitution banned from the court, men tortured in prisons for profit, rigged court and jury and JEFF SESSIONS says judge Gloria is doing a good job in her illegal and unlawful kangaroo court. And Sessions praises Rosenstein for running the Mueller Kangaroo court.

    All Federal Judges are operating in violation of The Constitution and must be removed, with the courts shut-down and our Constitution of 1787 must be restored. See the work of Karen Hudes on this.

    See the lawsuits of George Webb also.

    AIM4Truth Anonymous.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *