Dr. Sutton has been a member of the AIM community for several years and is one of our Conclave experts in the medical field. In the audio below, she provides an update on how the trial is proceeding. Dr. Sutton can be reached at https://www.raphaelmedicine.com/
Dr. Sutton clarifiesterms used above:
A contraindication is distinct from an adverse event following vaccination.
Contraindications — conditions under which vaccines should NOT be administered. Decided exclusively by the ACIP Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Many/most of whom have conflicts of interest. The trend is for states to pass vaccine mandates with no religious exemptions, no personal belief exemptions, and the medical exemptions must comply with the ACIP guidelines.
Most contraindications are from a person having anaphylaxis (severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction.) following a vaccine. So in other words, you have to be damaged before you can be exempt.Then a person is exempt from that ONE vaccine and still must take all others. There are a few contraindications for congenital immune deficiency, cancer and chemotherapy, recent blood or gamma globulin infusion, and severe allergies to egg or yeast, in addition to anaphylaxis. It is important to note that up to 20% of the people die who experience anaphylaxis. Regulations require a high bar to skip a vaccine — put your life on the line.
NY, ME, WV, MS, and CA currently allow only Med exempt based on ACIP guidelines, no relig exempt or personal belief exempt– great map here:
Vaccine studies for FDA approval are remarkably short — 4-42 days, with some phone follow up. There is no true saline inert placebo, but an adjuvant or another vaccine is the so-called placebo which accurately named is not a placebo but a comparator. The vaccine performs well in this match-up, as you might imagine In the vaccine insert the word ‘placebo’ is still used! Misleading!
The primary post-marketing follow up is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System: VAERS. By design, doctors are required to report serious adverse events after vaccines, but the process is cumbersome and rarely accomplished. Patients may report adverse events. Reporting an event does not indicate causality. This data is not considered strong statistically, b/c it is passive reporting (not actively sought). It is not statistically strong. It is estimated only 1% -10% of all serious vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS.
A grant was given to Harvard Pilgrim HMO to make adverse event reporting an automatic part of the electronic medical record. This would follow appointments, diagnoses, and lab results in the EMR after a vaccine. This system estimated the frequency of adverse events after vaccination was 1/39. The media/medicine statement is the serious adverse events from vaccines are 1/1 million. The grant never went to fruition, as the CDC colleagues stopped answering phone calls from the study leaders.
AEFI adverse event following immunization is a common term in the vaccine literature. This indicates a temporal relation between the vaccine and the adverse event.
The Institute of Medicine periodically evaluates adverse events to see if they are caused by the vaccines. There are 20-30 adverse EVENTS
which are called adverse EFFECTS of vaccines b/c there is consistently supportive evidence of causality. The other adverse events do not have enough information to determine if causally related or not to the vaccine.
The claim that adverse events are ‘not related to vaccines’ for the most part is not a scientific statement, because, there is not enough information to determine causality or lack of causality. That doesn’t stop media/medicine from making claims of ‘no relation.’ If a person were reading the science, they would have to say: we don;t know. Of course, that makes it harder to justify BROAD vaccine programs, especially MANDATED vaccines, which will impact the most vulnerable, and in those states without exemptions, they are impacted without a defense.
“From Rockefeller’s support of patent medicine to Gates’ patent vaccines, medical establishment invested a great deal in intellectual ignorance. Through the control over medical education and research it has created a public illusion to prop up corporate profit and encouraged the lust for money and power. An overview of data on cancer and vaccine sciences, the status of Americans’ health, a survey of repeated failed projects, economic toxicity, and heavy drug consumption or addiction among young and old provide compelling evidence that in the twentieth century nearly all classic disease categories (congenital, inheritance, neonatal, or induced) shifted to increase induced diseases.
Examples of this deceptology in ignoring or minimizing, and mocking fundamental discoveries and theories in cancer and vaccine sciences are attacks on research showing that (a), effective immunity is responsible for defending and killing pathogens and defective cancerous cells, correcting and repairing genetic mutations; (b) viruses cause cancer; and (c), abnormal gene mutations are often the consequences of (and secondary to) disturbances in effective immunity. The outcomes of cancer reductionist approaches to therapies reveal failure rates of 90% (+/‐5) for solid tumors; loss of over 50 million lives and waste of $30‐50 trillions on too many worthless, out‐of‐focus, and irresponsible projects.” Continue reading. Full report as a PDF:
“Coronaviruses” created with “gain of function”, that is, increased contagion, have been created in the Wuhan lab for years, and are genetically engineered bioweapons.
The NIH with Fauci and the new administration, are now again funding the Wuhan laboratory to develop more of these genetically engineered bioweapons.
New ones are gradually released, creating the public perception that Injections (“vaccines”) are absolutely necessary. Very little information is given about the most important factor which is strengthening your immune system. This myth about the injections is a much more harmful perception than the current masking myth.
Now that the public has been widely influenced through the constant mass media narrative and propaganda, the government has also paved the way for the rollout of Bill Gate’s “Covid-19 vaccines”. This coordinated plan goes all the way back to the Trump administration. This is the next step in the “Georgia Guide-Stones” depopulation plan. These injections are mRNA weapons of mass destruction.
However, there is another highly possible future development, not foreseen by Gates and his psychopathic globalist partners. In the video link below at Brighteon,
I am not writing this to change anyone’s mind about the current experimental mRNA covid “vaccine” methodology. Because most people are in one of two camps anyway — those who put blind faith in mainstream reporting and “official” narratives — and those who tend to question “official” narratives. Adult minds are rarely changed about fundamental ideology or how they think. That’s never been my motivation. This is no different.
I am writing this for the preparedness-minded. Period. For those who instinctively dig deeper (or dig at all!). Many of the preparedness-minded will prepare for the worst, while hoping for the best (hope is just a box to shut out risk and danger). This one is certainly “for the worst”, should it come to pass.
Here we go…
“Global Catastrophe Without Equal”
Vanden Bossche argues that humanity is now facing “a global catastrophe without equal,” because of the mass administration of what he considers to be the wrong vaccines.
Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, is an independent virologist and vaccine expert from Belgium, formerly employed at the Vaccine Alliance GAVI and at The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
He is a pro-vaxxer.
HOWEVER, “When someone who appears to have devoted most of their career to developing and helping roll out vaccines globally decides to blow the whistle on the current global mass vaccination program, only an incautious person would choose to ignore it. That’s of course just what the mainstream media has done so far — an indicator of just how incautious this communication vehicle has become.” quoted from a related report from childrenshealthdefense.org.
His warning sent chills down my spine after I read the entire report. Why? Because he has been “in the club” so to speak. He adamantly believes the current mass Covid vaccinations (the consequences thereof) may theoretically substantially cull the human population!!
Bossche is pleading with the WHO, the world, to immediately halt the current mass vaccinations, right now.
Although it may already be too late. Man oh man I hope he is wrong! But his credentials are what kept me reading and my motivation to report this to whoever might read this site.
I am a critical thinker to the extent I can shed normalcy bias (which we all have to some degree). Especially when mainstream and/or .gov “officials” and/or Big Tech prohibit non-narrative voices, I become exceedingly and instinctively skeptical. Thus my digging for alternative opinions while seeking out “truths”. Vanden Bossche is pleading for his colleagues to stop and reconsider how they’re doing this [mRNA rollout], and right now.
I have discovered many voices cautioning against this particular “vaccine” which is actually NOT a vaccine , but an experimental mRNA (it’s different). Their voices are eliminated from mainstream public discourse, despite credentials or credibility. There’s not even discussion about this. Which is VERY ALARMING. The present mass vaccinations are the “human test trials” of something that has NEVER been done before. We’re doing it on a global scale. Many experts have warned about the potential for bad outcomes. Some very bad indeed.
Okay lets get to the warning from Vanden Bossche. I wish that I didn’t feel compelled to report this. I want life to return to normal. But there’s a lot going against us… We need to be prepared as we can be for what may come. And if it doesn’t (which is the outcome I wish for) you will have lost nothing, as it only helps your self reliance and sustainability.
Viral Immune Escape
The core of his warning is something called “viral immune escape,” which begets a weakened natural immunity and vaccine resistance to variants. This is what he believes will happen (is happening) to those who receive the present Covid “vaccination” shots. And it will affect ALL OF US, because of “them”.
“This type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic,”
“How long can one ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity?”
“It’s becoming increasingly difficult to imagine how the consequences of the extensive and erroneous human intervention in this pandemic are not going to wipe out large parts of our human population.”
Vanden Bossche suggests that herd immunity will not be achieved with the current vaccines, as they “turn vaccine recipients into asymptomatic carriers who are shedding virus.”
(NK) Natural Killer cells instead
He calls for the use of vaccines that would be completely different from conventional vaccines in that they’re not inducing the B and T cells, but rather the natural killer (NK) cells.
According to Vanden Bossche, there is compelling scientific evidence that the NK cells play a key role in facilitating complete elimination of COVID-19 at an early stage of infection in asymptomatic infected subjects.
Vanden Bossche has already warned various organizations, including the WHO, about his findings and recommendations.
Immediate Cancellation of ALL Ongoing Covid-19 Mass Vaccination Campaigns
For him, “immediate cancellation of all ongoing Covid-19 mass vaccination campaigns should now become THE most acute health emergency of international concern,” and he urges an immediate international debate on the issue.
It’s Likely Too Late Already – The Worst Is Yet To Come
The worst of the pandemic is still to come. Bossche argues we are now experiencing the calm before the storm. Vanden Bossche predicts the next wave of infection will be dramatic — far worse than anything we’ve seen to-date.
This is because there will be more mutants to which the adaptive immune system provides little resistance, and this will come at the expense of decreased innate immune effectiveness.
While he mentions that NK cell-based vaccines, which he claims to have been researching for the last decade or so but about which he also says he has no commercial interest, are the ultimate solution, he believes it is likely too late to escape the storm.
Source Reports and my closing thoughts
Of all the reports I’ve read or heard or watched to-date, this one has me the most concerned.
If this man is right, we are all in so much trouble that it’s difficult to contemplate the ramifications. Difficult because it’s so apocalyptic. And that’s why I’m reporting this to you, the preparedness-minded. Take of it as you will. But this one has shaken me awake once again.
I had been getting a bit complacent. I have even been making longer-term plans for 6 months from now which may get overturned if this plays out as Bossche warns. Therefore I need to adapt my thinking and alternatives for just-in-case we begin seeing this.
My closing thought is this… Nothing is going to change with the current mass global mRNA Covid-19 “vaccination” rollout. Nothing is going to stop it at this point.
Whatever is going to happen because of this, is going to happen.
There will be coverups. The blame will NOT go onto the mRNA experimental shots. Instead it will all go onto the new deadly strains (which itself will be because of the current mass vaccination programs!).
If this culminates into massive die-offs from deadlier and more contagious strains, the resultant lockdowns will pale in comparison to what we’ve already experienced.
Shortages will be a ridiculous understatement. Systems will come to a halt. We will be on our own. This will become a worst case situation. One that will cull much of modern human civilization.
Survival will be difficult. So many things will have to go “right” just to stand a chance. Location. Year-round Sustainability. Security.
Listen, I hope Vanden Bossche is very wrong. But hope is just a mental box to stuff one’s concerns and fears. That’s not reality.
I encourage you to read the following report, which gets somewhat technical. But it’s the original source to Bossche’s plea to the world, from COVEXIT.com
A MEMORIALIZING RESOLUTION for the sovereign State of New York, 62 County sub-divisions and its 1651 home-rule Cities /Towns and Villages to protect its citizens against unconstitutional and medically irresponsible COVID-19 vaccine and mask medical device mandates.
Whereas the Founders designated that a Bill of Rights was necessary to guard individual liberty against encroachments from state and federal actors, public and private; and
Whereas the 14th Amendment to the United States of America Constitution under the emergencies of the Emergency Banking Relief Act with Proclamations 2039 /2040 that explicitly directs states not to “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”; and
Whereas no supposed COVID vaccine is FDA-approved but some are authorized under a temporary Emergency Use Authorization as experimental (investigational) agents only; and
Whereas emergency use products are specifically prohibited by federal law 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 from being mandated: “Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies … require …the option to accept or refuse administration of the product”; and
Whereas the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) affirmed in August 2020 that under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), experimental vaccines (medical devices) are not allowed to be mandatory”; and
Whereas decades-old universally accepted Codes of Medical Ethics, including the Nuremberg Code of 1947 and the Declaration of Helsinki on and after June 1964 absolutely prohibits any form of coercion whatsoever to individuals participate in a medical experiment; and
Whereas 40 percent of respondents in at least one US poll reported that they would opt out of taking experimental COVID vaccines; and
Whereas it is neither feasible nor safe to mandate experimental vaccination given the large number of COVID-19 recovered patients in the general population and the FDA / Pfizer/ Moderna / AstraZeneca / Johnson & Johnson and related protocols which excluded COVID-19 recovered patients; and
Whereas it is neither feasible nor safe to administer experimental vaccines to many groups of patients, such as persons with post-natural infections, waning titers, allergic reactions, as well as childbearing women, etc.; and
Whereas public and private measures are nonetheless being considered to mandate experimental vaccinations in order to participate in certain public activities and functions of daily American life, including but not limited to: employment, in-person school attendance, public transportation, and concert performances; and
Whereas “vaccine passports,” “digital health IDs,” and other such required documentation pose substantial risks to personal privacy and equal treatment before the law for all citizens of the sovereign State of New York, 62 County sub-divisions and its 1651 home-rule Cities / Towns and Villages as well as the United States generally; and
Whereas administration of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines according to guidelines established by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices do not provide adequate protections for average Americans concerned about potential health hazards associated with the inoculations; and
Whereas the public is entitled to receive unbiased, transparent, easily accessible medical information related to all vaccines from their public health officials; and
Whereas the emergency powers assumed by the chief executives of certain states as well as municipal leaders violate certain unalienable rights guaranteed under the amended US Constitution for the United States of America and its Bill of Rights and therefore deserve redress; and
Whereas while these legitimate grievances are pursued by the courts of various states, state lawmakers must enshrine certain rights against encroachment by decrees that are not medically or scientifically indicated, such as vaccine mandates, in order to ensure the continuity of these rights; and
Whereas that a COVID-19 Vaccine Bill of Rights memorialized by this resolution against COVID-19 vaccine mandates provides an example of adoption for other legislative bodies across the United States of America and territories to be recognized and upheld by the attorneys general of those states; and
Whereas that the major principles of this Vaccine Bill of Rights will include a minimum of four (4) of the following six (6) provisions:
No persons will be mandated, coerced, forced or pressured to take an experimental or “investigational” medication.
No physician or nurse shall be asked by an employer to promote a COVID-19 vaccine.
All persons reserve the right, at all times, to determine what is in their own best medical interest without threat to their livelihood or freedom of movement.
All persons must be given access to independent information to help them determine what is in their own best medical interest, including the risk of death based upon age/condition from contracting COVID-19 naturally. This must include information from sources that are independent of a conflict of interest. For example, pharmaceutical companies have an inherent conflict of interest, as do government or quasi-government institutions. Such information can be included but cannot be the sole source of information.
The frail elderly are additionally entitled to a knowledgeable, independent advocate with medical training to help them determine their own medical interest.
Private businesses operating within the jurisdiction have no legal authority to require or mandate or coerce medication or experimental medication for any persons; and
Whereas technical guidance for employers released by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in December should not be understood to undermine employee constitutional rights laid out herein; and
Whereas state legislative bodies must practice oversight of such federal assistance consistent with their enumerated powers; and
Whereas out-of-state commercial vendors, including Ticketmaster, cannot require venue operators and organizers to mandate proof of vaccination from concertgoers and other paying customers before freely entering a venue on private or public property; and
Whereas K-12 vaccinations cannot be required without certain clear and consistent exemptions applied, among them medical and conscience clauses, or risk forfeiting a district’s or school board’s authority in the State of the sovereign State of New York, 62 County sub-divisions and its 1651 home-rule Cities / Towns and Villages to authorize such a mandate, nor can a vaccine mandate for these populations be a factor in state school-aid funding; and
Whereas interstate carriers such as airlines and all forms of public transit calling for so-called “vaccine passports” as a condition of entry cannot be allowed to operate with state licensure and waivers, and furthermore this resolution would call on federal entities such as the FAA to issue new rules prohibiting COVID-19 vaccine mandates for all carrier crews and customers; and
Therefore, be it resolved that the legislature of the sovereign State of New York, 62 County sub-divisions and its 1651 home-rule Cities / Towns and Villages memorializes a COVID-19 Vaccine Bill of Rights for the purposes of defending the constitutional liberties of its citizens, promoting sound science, and outlining a framework of best practices for state authorities and federal regulators to develop in this evolving phase of experimental vaccine administration and implementation.
Be it further resolved that copies of this resolution be sent to the President of the United States, the United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, the Federal Aviation Administration, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and United States delegation to the United Nations and its agencies.
Alert to all British patriots: Pass this information through your downline and networks. The British military is going door to door for “voluntary testing”. You must resist. Inform your neighbors.
Also, notice half way through the video, as the people are walking down the street, there are utility poles with 5G units. THIS IS NOT GOOD. They are creating an urban “oven” to fry their citizens using a combo of vaccines, nanobots, and 5G. Below this video, we left you headline links that take you to articles that describe how these modern genocide ovens work.
Over 110 years ago, at a time when medicine was not yet sufficiently advanced to have developed penicillin and the germ theory of medicine was still new, the Supreme Court of the United States made a ruling related to a citizen’s rights in healthcare that has remained largely unaddressed to this day. Over the century plus of time that has since passed the court has decided many critical cases revolving around individual rights that have never been squared with Jacobson.Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).
A century ago many of our most sacred and fundamental rights were still being sorted out. Suffrage had not yet occurred, civil rights barely existed, critical cases on fundamental rights such as interstate travel and bodily privacy had not come into play and the administrative state that we live in today simply did not exist.
Today, under the guidance of an unelected administrative structure, many of the rights our Supreme Court has determined are fundamental under our Constitution are being denied. These fundamental rights are being denied, not out of prudence, they are being denied due to unfounded fear and intentional manipulation. So successful is this manipulation that even our esteemed Chief Justice, the Honorable Justice Roberts, was misled in a recent decision.
But all is not lost. In its wisdom, the Jacobsoncourt made clear that it never intended its decision to bar further review. To the contrary, the Court in Jacobsonspecifically stated:“Before closing this opinion, we deem it appropriate, in order to prevent misapprehension as to our views, to observe –perhaps to repeat a thought already sufficiently expressed, namely –that the police power of a State, whether exercised by the legislature or by a local body acting under its authority, may be exerted in such circumstances or by regulations so arbitrary and oppressive in particular cases as to justify the interference of the courts to prevent wrong and oppression.” (Id, 197 US 38)
In recent months, entire states have been imprisoned without due process and with the clear threat to impose such lockdowns again, interstate travel has been severely restricted, privacy rights have been devastated, numerous business takings without compensation, and many regulations being implemented without statutory process requirements under the guise of a health emergency that is roughly as dangerous as a seasonal influenza outbreak. The plaintiffs in this case have all been injured in various capacities by these unconstitutional actions, and without action by the Court, will be left without redress.
More terrifying, without action by the Court, the Court will be setting future precedent that will allow states to withhold fundamental Constitutional rights, in violation of US Supreme Court precedent, circumventing the various levels of scrutiny applied to such rights, and justify such actions under public health emergency orders without subjecting those orders to any real review –just trust the bureaucrats because they are the experts.
We humbly ask the Court in this case to:
Reaffirm its position as a coequal branch of the government.
2. Reaffirm the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that rights, especially fundamental rights, may not be abridged unless necessary to serve a compelling governmental interest, and that even then, those restrictions must be narrowly tailored to meet acompelling governmental interest.
3. Ensure there is an opportunity for redress under any emergency declaration
4. Recognize that the political process and operative orders are invalid if based on false or misleading information (cite rule making case in admin law) and recognize the criticality that all future emergency orders be based and maintained on clear, honest facts -particularly when such orders are infringing on Constitutional rights.
Underlying all of this, and the foundation of this case is this question: if an emergency can be declared without the appropriate level of review based on the rights being limited, and under the guise of that emergency all rights are only subject to a rational basis review, how then do any previous judicial opinions or Constitutional principles have any meaning whatsoever?
Further, if under the same circumstances different levels of scrutiny are applied to the various rights being limited under an emergency declaration than would otherwise be applicable, what is the value of having various levels of review?