Category: Vaccine Wars

Vaccine Bill of Rights

MEMORIALIZING RESOLUTION URGING THE FREE STATES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO IMMEDIATELY ENACT A VACCINE BILL OF RIGHTS

Share from GAB: https://gab.com/Gabriels_Horn/posts/105764988560723611

A MEMORIALIZING RESOLUTION for the sovereign State of New York, 62 County sub-divisions and its 1651 home-rule Cities /Towns and Villages to protect its citizens against unconstitutional and medically irresponsible COVID-19 vaccine and mask medical device mandates.

Whereas the Founders designated that a Bill of Rights was necessary to guard individual liberty against encroachments from state and federal actors, public and private; and

Whereas the 14th Amendment to the United States of America Constitution under the emergencies  of the Emergency Banking Relief Act with Proclamations 2039 /2040 that explicitly directs states not to “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”; and

Whereas no supposed COVID vaccine is FDA-approved but some are authorized under a temporary Emergency Use Authorization as experimental (investigational) agents only; and

Whereas emergency use products are specifically prohibited by federal law 21 U.S.C. §360bbb-3 from being mandated: “Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies … require …the option to accept or refuse administration of the product”; and

Whereas the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) affirmed in August 2020 that under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), experimental vaccines (medical devices) are not allowed to be mandatory”; and

Whereas decades-old universally accepted Codes of Medical Ethics, including the Nuremberg Code of 1947 and the Declaration of Helsinki on and after June 1964 absolutely prohibits any form of coercion whatsoever to individuals participate in a medical experiment; and

Whereas 40 percent of respondents in at least one US poll reported that they would opt out of taking experimental COVID vaccines; and

Whereas it is neither feasible nor safe to mandate experimental vaccination given the large number of COVID-19 recovered patients in the general population and the FDA / Pfizer/ Moderna / AstraZeneca / Johnson & Johnson and related protocols which excluded COVID-19 recovered patients; and

Whereas it is neither feasible nor safe to administer experimental vaccines to many groups of patients, such as persons with post-natural infections, waning titers, allergic reactions, as well as childbearing women, etc.; and

Whereas public and private measures are nonetheless being considered to mandate experimental vaccinations in order to participate in certain public activities and functions of daily American life, including but not limited to: employment, in-person school attendance, public transportation, and concert performances; and

Whereas “vaccine passports,” “digital health IDs,” and other such required documentation pose substantial risks to personal privacy and equal treatment before the law for all citizens of the sovereign State of New York, 62 County sub-divisions and its 1651 home-rule Cities / Towns and Villages as well as the United States generally; and

Whereas administration of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines according to guidelines established by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices do not provide adequate protections for average Americans concerned about potential health hazards associated with the inoculations; and

Whereas the public is entitled to receive unbiased, transparent, easily accessible medical information related to all vaccines from their public health officials; and

Whereas the emergency powers assumed by the chief executives of certain states as well as municipal leaders violate certain unalienable rights guaranteed under the amended US Constitution for the United States of America and its Bill of Rights and therefore deserve redress; and

Whereas while these legitimate grievances are pursued by the courts of various states, state lawmakers must enshrine certain rights against encroachment by decrees that are not medically or scientifically indicated, such as vaccine mandates, in order to ensure the continuity of these rights; and

Whereas that a COVID-19 Vaccine Bill of Rights memorialized by this resolution against COVID-19 vaccine mandates provides an example of adoption for other legislative bodies across the United States of America and territories to be recognized and upheld by the attorneys general of those states; and

Whereas that the major principles of this Vaccine Bill of Rights will include a minimum of four (4) of the following six (6) provisions:

  • No persons will be mandated, coerced, forced or pressured to take an experimental or “investigational” medication.
  • No physician or nurse shall be asked by an employer to promote a COVID-19 vaccine.
  • All persons reserve the right, at all times, to determine what is in their own best medical interest without threat to their livelihood or freedom of movement.
  • All persons must be given access to independent information to help them determine what is in their own best medical interest, including the risk of death based upon age/condition from contracting COVID-19 naturally. This must include information from sources that are independent of a conflict of interest. For example, pharmaceutical companies have an inherent conflict of interest, as do government or quasi-government institutions. Such information can be included but cannot be the sole source of information.
  • The frail elderly are additionally entitled to a knowledgeable, independent advocate with medical training to help them determine their own medical interest.
  • Private businesses operating within the jurisdiction have no legal authority to require or mandate or coerce medication or experimental medication for any persons; and

Whereas technical guidance for employers released by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in December should not be understood to undermine employee constitutional rights laid out herein; and

Whereas state legislative bodies must practice oversight of such federal assistance consistent with their enumerated powers; and

Whereas out-of-state commercial vendors, including Ticketmaster, cannot require venue operators and organizers to mandate proof of vaccination from concertgoers and other paying customers before freely entering a venue on private or public property; and

Whereas K-12 vaccinations cannot be required without certain clear and consistent exemptions applied, among them medical and conscience clauses, or risk forfeiting a district’s or school board’s authority in the State of the sovereign State of New York, 62 County sub-divisions and its 1651 home-rule Cities / Towns and Villages to authorize such a mandate, nor can a vaccine mandate for these populations be a factor in state school-aid funding; and

Whereas interstate carriers such as airlines and all forms of public transit calling for so-called “vaccine passports” as a condition of entry cannot be allowed to operate with state licensure and waivers, and furthermore this resolution would call on federal entities such as the FAA to issue new rules prohibiting COVID-19 vaccine mandates for all carrier crews and customers; and

Therefore, be it resolved that the legislature of the sovereign State of New York, 62 County sub-divisions and its 1651 home-rule Cities / Towns and Villages memorializes a COVID-19 Vaccine Bill of Rights for the purposes of defending the constitutional liberties of its citizens, promoting sound science, and outlining a framework of best practices for state authorities and federal regulators to develop in this evolving phase of experimental vaccine administration and implementation.

Be it further resolved that copies of this resolution be sent to the President of the United States, the United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, the Federal Aviation Administration, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and United States delegation to the United Nations and its agencies.

Surgeon explains the coronavirus hoax

Read the Contagion Myth to learn more and dazzle your downline with how smart you are! Chapter 2 is about electricity and disease and chapter 15 is about 5G.

Why is electricity and 5G a part of the virus conversation, you ask? We explain why in this report below:

The Hidden Dangers of Electricity Are a Mortal Threat to Humanity

Raw audio file: https://aim4truth.org/surgeon-says-masks-do-not-work-mp4/

Continue your citizen education:

Face Masks for the Walking Dead

British Military Knocking on Doors for COVID Testing

Alert to all British patriots: Pass this information through your downline and networks. The British military is going door to door for “voluntary testing”. You must resist. Inform your neighbors.

Also, notice half way through the video, as the people are walking down the street, there are utility poles with 5G units. THIS IS NOT GOOD. They are creating an urban “oven” to fry their citizens using a combo of vaccines, nanobots, and 5G. Below this video, we left you headline links that take you to articles that describe how these modern genocide ovens work.

.

.

The Hidden Dangers of Electricity Are a Mortal Threat to Humanity

Charles M. Lieber and the Queen’s QinetiQ

Charles M. Lieber Uses Viruses, Nanotechnology, and 5G to Eradicate Humanity

The Queen’s Crown Virus Must Be Destroyed Before It Destroys Humanity

Moderna’s totally disqualifying RED FLAG “strategic” relationships to the Queen, Wellcome Trust, and Bill Gates

Ohio Citizens Demand Their Civil Rights

New Ohio lawsuit re. COVID hoax

COMPLAINT, Michael Renze et al v. Michael DeWine et al, Case No. 3:20-cv-1948, Judge James G. Carr, filed Sep. 01, 2020  (N.D. Ohio, 2020).

Introduction and Prayer for Relief

Over 110 years ago, at a time when medicine was not yet sufficiently advanced to have developed penicillin and the germ theory of medicine was still new, the Supreme Court of the United States made a ruling related to a citizen’s rights in healthcare that has remained largely unaddressed to this day. Over the century plus of time that has since passed the court has decided many critical cases revolving around individual rights that have never been squared with Jacobson.Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).

A century ago many of our most sacred and fundamental rights were still being sorted out. Suffrage had not yet occurred, civil rights barely existed, critical cases on fundamental rights such as interstate travel and bodily privacy had not come into play and the administrative state that we live in today simply did not exist.

Today, under the guidance of an unelected administrative structure, many of the rights our Supreme Court has determined are fundamental under our Constitution are being denied. These fundamental rights are being denied, not out of prudence, they are being denied due to unfounded fear and intentional manipulation. So successful is this manipulation that even our esteemed Chief Justice, the Honorable Justice Roberts, was misled in a recent decision.

But all is not lost. In its wisdom, the Jacobsoncourt made clear that it never intended its decision to bar further review. To the contrary, the Court in Jacobsonspecifically stated:“Before closing this opinion, we deem it appropriate, in order to prevent misapprehension as to our views, to observe –perhaps to repeat a thought already sufficiently expressed, namely –that the police power of a State, whether exercised by the legislature or by a local body acting under its authority, may be exerted in such circumstances or by regulations so arbitrary and oppressive in particular cases as to justify the interference of the courts to prevent wrong and oppression.” (Id, 197 US 38)

In recent months, entire states have been imprisoned without due process and with the clear threat to impose such lockdowns again, interstate travel has been severely restricted, privacy rights have been devastated, numerous business takings without compensation, and many regulations being implemented without statutory process requirements under the guise of a health emergency that is roughly as dangerous as a seasonal influenza outbreak. The plaintiffs in this case have all been injured in various capacities by these unconstitutional actions, and without action by the Court, will be left without redress.

More terrifying, without action by the Court, the Court will be setting future precedent that will allow states to withhold fundamental Constitutional rights, in violation of US Supreme Court precedent, circumventing the various levels of scrutiny applied to such rights, and justify such actions under public health emergency orders without subjecting those orders to any real review –just trust the bureaucrats because they are the experts.

We humbly ask the Court in this case to:

  1. Reaffirm its position as a coequal branch of the government.

2. Reaffirm the US Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that rights, especially fundamental rights, may not be abridged unless necessary to serve a compelling governmental interest, and that even then, those restrictions must be narrowly tailored to meet acompelling governmental interest.

3. Ensure there is an opportunity for redress under any emergency declaration

4. Recognize that the political process and operative orders are invalid if based on false or misleading information (cite rule making case in admin law) and recognize the criticality that all future emergency orders be based and maintained on clear, honest facts -particularly when such orders are infringing on Constitutional rights.

Underlying all of this, and the foundation of this case is this question: if an emergency can be declared without the appropriate level of review based on the rights being limited, and under the guise of that emergency all rights are only subject to a rational basis review, how then do any previous judicial opinions or Constitutional principles have any meaning whatsoever?

Further, if under the same circumstances different levels of scrutiny are applied to the various rights being limited under an emergency declaration than would otherwise be applicable, what is the value of having various levels of review?

Read the entire complaint here.

Global Genocide Now in Progress

In previous Cat Reports, we have explained the “steps towards genocide.” You all know the first step – identify and classify. It’s the same thing ranchers do before harvesting a herd of animals. This is why governments are requiring you to wear a mask. Science shows us that they do not protect from viruses. It’s about CONTROL. They need a mass of people to fall in line, comply, and not ask questions.

The Uygher people first wore the masks:

uygher wear masks

Then they were forced into home imprisonment, later into concentration camps, surrounded by 5G towers. Of course, they were vaccinated in the process.

vaccinated child

uygher concentration camps

Once inside the camps, the human harvesting begins. First the hair is cut and sold on world markets. Other persons are processed for human organs and blood.

human hair

.

organ harvesting

Once the human masses are chipped, marked, and controlled, they are loaded onto rail cars for further processing. Like a herd of cows and sheep, these humans are headed to the processing plants.

新疆 : 新讲 Xinjiang : a New Explanation

.

Chinese Ambassador Struggles To Explain Shocking Footage Of Handcuffed & Blindfolded Uighurs Loaded Onto Train

.

Global genocide is currently under operation. The Rothschild agents start with the easiest to control populations, like the Uyghers in China, to work out the kinks in the system. While these humans are being harvested TODAY, others like YOU are being prepared for harvest TOMORROW.

First, comes the visual control. It can be a blue scarf (Cambodia), a yellow star (Jews), or a facial covering. The identification step is the deadliest one because you must AGREE to wear it. Once you agree, the genocidists know the rest of the process is easy-peasy. Soon you will be at the FEMA camp, getting ready for processing, too.

This is why you must resist the face mask as though your and your family’s life depends on it – because the next step (microchipping, vaccinations, re-education camps, etc.) may be too much for you to overcome.

mask compliance

.

Couple forced to wear ankle monitors to self-isolate after Kentucky woman tests positive for COVID-19 REMEMBER, IT’S JUST A MASK. IT’S JUST SOCIAL DISTANCING. IT’S JUST AN ANKLE BRACELET, IT’S JUST A VACCINE, IT’S JUST A TRAIN…….IT’S JUST SHOWER.

.

genocide chart

How is your state governor or local dictator preparing you and your family for slaughter?

My State Authorized Mandatory Vaccination…Has Yours?

.

Arizona Gov Is Granted the Right to Forcibly Vaccinate and Indefintely Confine Individuals With Absolutely No Legal Oversight

.

genocide abortion

HOW THE ROTHSCHILDS USE MASS SURVEILLANCE AND NANOTECH BIOWEAPONS TO SUSTAIN THE IMPERIAL BRITISH WORLD ORDER

Read this blockbuster report, just under the headline link:

HOW THE ROTHSCHILDS USE MASS SURVEILLANCE AND NANOTECH BIOWEAPONS TO SUSTAIN THE IMPERIAL BRITISH WORLD ORDER

lord rosebery

Read more about:

charles lieber afiIndicted Harvard nano-scientist Charles M. Lieber investigations have taken an unexpected turn into Pilgrims Society pathogen biotechnology bankrolled by the Rothschilds

David Sarnoff hired Charles’ father, Robert I. Lieber, to engineer radar, satellite and missile systems that could deliver microbe payloads according to Sarnoff’s well-publicized 1926 dystopian vision of the “devastating consequences of new miracles in science

Read the full report. Massive discovery of TRUTH HISTORY not told in textbooks and schools. Rothschild world-wide take-over conspiracy revealed with FACTS and EVIDENCE.

The Propaganda of Dr. Shiva

Not so fast Dr. Shiva….we see the Hillary Clinton sycophant you are. But first let’s catch this audience up on some details about your past claims to have invented email.

Shiva’s claims about being ‘the inventor of email’ are bogus, propaganda, Pilgrims Society smokescreen to put a patent claims buffer between IBM/Lotus and everyone else (the then chosen platform for the NWO)

shiva patent

Shiva Ayyadurai. (Awarded Dec. 23, 2003). U.S. Pat. No. 6,668,281, Relationship Management System and Method Using Asychronous Electronic Messaging. U.S. Patent Office.

Shiva Ayyadurai 1

In his 1999 patent, https://www.vashiva.com/pdf/vashiva_pat11.pdf, Shiva only cites IBM Notes, and IBM Domino as prior art that was reviewed. Note: This was THE groupware system that the Highlands Group, DoD Office of Net Assessment and their Pilgrims Society handlers were counting on to implement the “IBM Internet of Things.” Notably, hindsight shows us that at this time, IBM had already founded the IBM Eclipse Foundation (Nov. 29, 2001) with Leader Technologies Ne’er-do-well patent attorney, James P. Chandler, III, and IBM Eclipse was already giving away Leader inventions (including its Leader Mail inventions for use with its social backbone), that they had stolen, to everyone in Silicon Valley, government, education, commerce and military.

This disclosure alone shows the Examiner, or Shiva, or both, were brain dead in their examination of “prior art” to meet the “novel and nonobvious” standards for patentability. Curiously, the “patent wrapper” for this patent does not provide the customary the file drawer for this filing, as it should do.

By the late 1990’s, numerous email systems with the exact features of Inbox, Outbox, etc. Groups, sorting, filters, etc. were in wide use. Those systems included: Leader Mail, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Exchange, Novel Groupwise, Novel Groupwise Email, Hotmail, YahooMail, Lotus Notes, Lotus cc:Mail, AT&T Mail, AT&T Access (DOS version), AT&T AccessPlus 3.0 (Windows version), CompuServe (csmail), GEIS (mark400), MCI Mail, SPRINT Mail, X-400, BITNET, AOL Mail (“You’ve got mail.”)

.

The patent attorney handling this patent is Khaled Shami (former patent Examiner) https://www.linkedin.com/in/khaled-shami-0a27a17/ who says he is in the firm of BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC that does not list him as an attorney. His LinkedIn never mentions BUCHAN either https://www.linkedin.com/in/khaled-shami-0a27a17/

At minimum, this record raises numerous red flags. It is certainly ambiguous. The lack of a “patent wrapper” showing the examiner’s review of the Prior Art begs the question of who is running interference for Shiva? The patent is evidently invalid due to the utter lack of disclosure of significant prior art that the examiner should have used to reject the application as obvious and therefore non-patentable. Certainly Shiva is not justified in saying that he is the “inventor of email.”

This Wikipedia entry is a more accurate reflection of the origins of email.

One serious problem with this Shiva patent is that he does not cite his own prior work, touted on his current website, as prior art. Therefore, his own documents prove this patent bogus.

Here’s Shiva’s history from his site:

V. A. Shiva Ayyadurai. (Apr. 29, 2020). Inventor history, The Inventor o  Email – History. Vashiva.com.

(Note: We have backups of these documents if they disappear from Shiva’s website now that we are bringing attention to them.)

For example, he shows an UNDATED 1981 alleged Westinghouse entry describing his alleged email design in esquisite detail. This document appears to be fake. Notably, Westinghouse is a Pilgrims Society company that is organically tied to NBC, RCA, Marconi and the Pilgrims Society. At minimum, he should have cited this document as prior art on all of his email filings, which would render them all as obvious… if this document really existed, which we now doubt seriously.

He cites an irrelevant 1978 NYU document.

He cites and irrelevant 1978 FORTRAN output that merely mentions email, but there is no association with him.

He shows a newspaper article from Oct. 30, 1980 (p. 8, Sec. 2) of the West Essex Tribune. The article says this project was under “tutelage of Blair Krimmel, head of the math department and the Independent Study program.” Since Shiva does not credit Blair Krimmel as a co-inventor, any subsequent claims are fraudulent (“inequitable conduct”).

His 1981 Westinghouse award discloses:

email shiva

Such prior art disclosure renders his own work as must-cite prior art in subsequent patent applications—thus invalidating his patent claims as not novel and obvious.

His 1981 MIT article is more evidence that his ideas for email were already widely known, and therefore not patentable.

His 1982 Copyright application only serves to show that he disclosed his work to the public in 1982, thus rendering subsequent patent claims impossible to make (since the public already knew about it). Copyrights and patents are very different intellectual property animals.

His 1982 Dr. Leslie Michelson, Ph.D. article is irrelevant to the subject to email.

His subsequent patents 6668281, 6718367, 6718368 (note the last two were issued on the same day, by the same patent examiners). Very odd, unless a fake portfolio is being created as a buffer against patent enemies of the patent office and Shiva’s handlers.

Conclusion: Shiva’s claim to be “the inventor of email” suffers a definite sulfurous odor.

https://www.inventorofemail.com/

https://vashiva.com/innovation/email/vashiva-inventor-history.asp

http://generalinteractive.com/

One of Shiva’s current companies – General Interactive

shiva companies

.

Whoa….all this on Dr. Shiva just on the first trip down the mines! The miners report seeing all kinds of nuggets regarding Dr. Shiva and his connection to Hillary Clinton, the vaccine world, Microsoft, and Bill Gates lying all over the place.

Coal miners 2

While you are waiting for our mining reports, get a glimpse of what we saw down there.

RFK Jr. Asks if Dr. Shiva Owning a Vaccine Company & Partnering with Microsoft is Why He’s Splintering the Movement

Don’t think for one minute that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a good guy in this. These are two globalist puppets creating kabuki theater for the vaccine wars. We are going to put both of these vaccine proponents into the bright light of truth.