Blockchain Banking – Is it Secure?

Post by AIMCat Peter

Re-visioning Money and Banking Series

Practical Steps Back to a Functional Reality

In the previous Part 1 of this journey, we found that our present money system has become an unworkable corruption of an initially sound concept to enable exchange of goods or services for reliable “value token” notes, issued by banks.

We set out the requirements for a sound system, and highlighted 3 ways that banks had gamed and corrupted these sound principles for their own benefit resulting in the mess we experience today.

However, to return to a functional mechanism is not possible at the mere flick of a switch, with the corruption so ingrained and globally spread.

We need to start with a list of issues that need to be covered in the reversion process:

1. As the present system has evolved to benefit those who run it, there will be much in-house resistance to any change which removes those benefits.

2. Any new system restarting from sound practice must be able to evolve ALONGSIDE the current, and interact with it as necessary in the interim.

3. This will unavoidably involve greater complexity in the transition period, with the public needing  to see clear immediate benefits to them overriding the upset of change.

4. Established law is built around the present structure, and so any new privately promoted “token” medium would have to be a form of cryptocurrency.

5. Not only sound and secure in itself, the mechanism would have not to detract from value invested in the current system, before it establishes itself.

6. The new development must be able to develop from a “standing start” through public approval and choice.

The following is a suggested start for consideration and debate:

Property Cryptocurrency

Owner occupied property offers the basis for secure, stable cryptocurrency to be created by those owners, using the property market value as collateral.

Property ownership, property value, property insurance, and financial charges against property can all be recorded and verified, with blockchain security protection, and be updated as and when any of these items changes.

This secure technology* therefore now allows the potential for individual owners of property to secure and create transferable credit for themselves based on this value, in cryptocurrency units corresponding to conventional credit units, as (say) “property dollars”….” property pounds”   etc.

As a starting point, it would be prudent to have an initial fixed ceiling to the creation of such crypto units of (say) 50% of the recorded market value of any property, in order to allow people to become accustomed to the concept, and practical process, in a demonstrably safe financial environment, not pushing the market valuation at any time to the extreme.

The cryptocurrency recording, and associated 50% cap, would be a blockchained entry on any specific property record, available for the owner to use and manage, or ignore if he or she wished. A dormant, or active resource at the discretion of the owner.

Once an owner had found another property owner with whom he had agreed a deal for the transfer of goods using the cryptocurrency, he would transfer the currency from his account over to the goods supplier’s account in the normal way, with blockchain security, so that now the goods supplier’s account showed he could “spend” more than his 50% property value, and the goods recipient’s account would show he had a corresponding amount less than his 50% value in his remaining account.

And so on……

The only further mechanism to consider is the arrangements to cover the eventual sale of the property, either by owner’s decision, or death.

When the property is transferred between owners, the transferor will either have the crypto account in it’s original balance, or in credit, or deficit with reference to it’s original balance.

If in original balance, the sale and transfer can be made entirely in the conventional way and the transferee will pay in full with conventional funding.

If there is a deficit on the original balance, then that deficit is transferred to the new owner, with that new owner having the benefit of a corresponding reduction in the amount he has to pay in conventional funding. The deficit remains until such time as he may return the crypto account to full original balance.

If in credit relative to the original balance, the transferor can transfer the credit amount to any new property crypto account he is buying. If he is not buying another property, he will have to transfer to another chosen property owner’s account, or let the credit remain for the benefit of the transferee.

These same options will apply to the property at death of the owner, or be subject to his Will provisions.

Under no circumstances will cryptocurrency credit or deficit numbers appear, or disappear, without a corresponding opposing deficit, or credit balance also occurring in the system in a naturally functioning way.

Those wishing to trade in this way would need person to person trading platforms, similar to Ebay or Gumtree to have the option to trade using the cryptocurrency, initially with their commission in conventional currency.

Clearly, once established and showing it’s benefits to trading parties, consideration could be given to raising the value limit percentage, in an organised review of the overall system rules.

With time and the accepted use of this means of exchange, housebuilders would have the opportunity to pay for building work in cryptocurrency, using any developing property value and applying the 50% rule.

Checking this Proposition Against the Original 6 Criteria Points Above

1. The only interaction with the present system is the potential reduction in conventional money where a property is sold with net cryptocurrency deficit. Existing banking business would otherwise be unaffected.

2.See 1. above – this mechanism can work entirely separately to the existing.

3. Initial buyers would be unfazed by a corresponding “loss” on future property sale, in order to have instant hassle-free goods or services. Initial sellers would have every confidence they could buy something with their crptocurrency “surplus” in due course.

4. Other private cryptocurrencies have emerged and thrived within the framework of law – this cryptocurrency has the added advantage of security against property value.

5. See 1. above. No problem here.

6. Time will tell, but once started there is no reason that this development shouldn’t go from strength to strength, allowing the raising of the 50% limit after time, if, and as needed.


Note from the Anonymous Patriots:

The asterisk * is because the American Intelligence Media has reported that BLOCKCHAIN technology is not secure at this time. There are ways to make it secure, but until the United States Patent Office is purged of British and foreign control, the engineers who have developed the new, very secure encryption system are not interested in offering their product for use. Personally, we would not digitize any of our assets, like property or wealth, on the blockchain until this encryption was included in the existing or new system. In the reports below, we busted Bitcoin as a CIA operation – and definitely NOT secure.

Satoshi Nakamoto Dossier Reveals CIA Ponzi Scheme

The REAL Creator of Bitcoin – Philip J. Venables


Cryptocurrency Victims Claims Expand

ASU President Groomed to Destroy America

ASU’s president Michael M. Crow is a British Pilgrims Society globalist meddler/traitor groomed  to take down the American Republic

His Carnegie Corporation/CFR financings prove he hates America (including Arizona)

His Sep. 29, 1999 formation of CIA the corporate fascist In-Q-Tel with fellow Pilgrims Society globalists Lockheed (British Crown-controlled, SERCO/QinetiQ), AT&T, Telecredit, Lucent, Marsh McLennan, DoD, Columbia, Xerox, Stanford proves he is a flaming FASCIST and has no business being anywhere near our young minds.

Arizonians, dump & jail the demonic Crow, before he dumps & jails you!

He funds CIA/Tavistock (British) brainwashing research at ASU


Michael Maurice Crow, president of Arizona State University—the self-anointed King of Arizona—is a well-groomed member of the British Pilgrims Society—placed to facilitate the “Great Reset” using Arizonians as experimental guinea pigs for election rigging, viral pathogens, brainwashing, 5G and depopulation

Crow’s 32-page ASU resume is evidently fake—no human being could do all the things he claims

See American Intelligence Media for more.

Michael Crow Serves the British Pilgrims Society

First. note that the Carnegie Corporation is so in love with Michael Crow that he is awarded a heft $500, 000 “leadership award” wink. wink. This is Carnegie’s way of making sure Crow supports all of their foreign anti-American programs as listed below.


Listed below are just a few of Carnegie Corporation traitorous fascist financings. Michael Crow is a globalist Pilgrims Society insider and leader in Carnegie which pushes all of these anti-American programs.











NOTE: Stimson (with William “Wild Bill” Donovan and Allen W. Dulles) was a Pilgrims Society organizer of The Marshall Plan at the end of WWII that funded fascist international corporations in the process of establish a new British world order.

See also: AFI. (Jul. 28, 2020). The Anglo-American (British) Pilgrims Society and its CFR minions used the Marshall Plan, shrouded in anti-communism, to seize control of global banking using Nazi & Japanese stolen gold. Americans for Innovation.






NOTE: History tells us that US President Woodrow Wilson was a dedicated Anglophile taking his orders from the British Pilgrims Society




Re-visioning Money and Banking

Post by AIMCat Peter

Money is a “token of value” invented to bridge any value asymmetry in an exchange of goods or services.

In any exchange of goods or services it is highly unlikely that the exchanging parties will each have exactly the same value to offer the other at the time, to create an entirely balanced barter deal.

Indeed, most exchanges are entirely in one direction, where goods or services are wanted by one party from the other, with no compensating value transfer.

To offset this value exchange imbalance a mechanism was developed to “store” real durable wealth (gold, silver, etc.) at a bank for safekeeping, and use banks “notes of value” receipts arising therefrom as “value tokens” which could effectively transfer ownership of some of that stored value to another in exchange for goods or services wanted.

So, we have banks reliably storing durable valuables deposited with them, the value receipts from which can act as transferable value tokens by the owner/depositor acceptable to another in exchange for real goods or services.

Clearly any time the owner/depositor wishes to remove his deposited valuables, he would have to return the full amount of bank tokens he had “spent” for the bank to cancel these notes, and entirely clear the deposit from their records.

With all banks working to a similar process, and with co-ordinated value token notes, it becomes possible for unrelated transactions to exchange value notes, from different banks, to have the same ability to redeem and complete any return of deposited wealth.

Over time, insured property was added to gold and silver as a reliable source of stored wealth, and money as an entirely paper-based concept was born.

A Great Idea – Corrupted by Greed

So, by this means, banks became middlemen controlling the safekeeping of deposited valuables, and created and transferred their paper “value notes” to and between depositors, enabling the flow of goods and services in otherwise unbalanced or one-way transfers.

This all worked accountably and reliably provided the value tokens issued always related to the value stored, and if any depositor of valuables with the bank wished to repossess them, he would have to return value notes to the bank equal to those he had spent against the security of the valuables, for the bank to cancel them and return the actual valuables.

However, rather than sticking within the constraints inherent in this understandable and reliable system, banks saw an opportunity to game the process in their favour.

Firstly, they realised that their paper “value notes” were constantly in demand as essential to the process of any exchange of goods or services, so rather than charge a fee for any work they actually did, they charged a small percentage continuously on the notes they issued.

Secondly, rather than this percentage being on the original notes only, they applied it to the additional notes needed as “interest” on the original notes also.

This “compound interest” payable to them had to be created against the continual devaluing of the notes against the deposited collateral value, a process we call “inflation”.

Thirdly, they noticed that most of the real value collateral deposited with them was not reclaimed over considerable periods of time, offering them the possibility of creating more “value notes” than they actually held in collateral value, allowing them to expand their business, albeit in a manner putting the whole money creation process into irredeemable risk and chaos.

To cover up the clear fraud of issuing more value notes than they had valuables in collateral, they created a book keeping process based on a lie, that the wealth they held was the value notes rather than the collateral valuables.

Thus, they created loans from these notes entirely independent of any collateral value they held.

Fraudulently accounting for “loans” being created by bank value notes (in the possession of depositors) being temporarily lent to borrowers, banks freed themselves to CREATE as many loans as they felt they could get away with, always assured that the resulting deposits would balance in their book keeping.

As further consolidation of this fraud, they paid “interest” to bank note depositors, reinforcing the false impression that deposited bank notes were “lent” to borrowers, rather than the opposite TRUTH that their loans (created by them at will) created deposits.

This true money creation process is set out and confirmed by Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin Q1 2014, entitled “Money Creation in the Modern Economy”. In this Bulletin, and to quote “…rather than lending out deposits that are placed with them, the act of lending creates deposits – THE REVERSE OF THE SEQUENCE TYPICALLY DESCRIBED IN TEXTBOOKS….” (capitals added by me for emphasis only).

When challenged as to why banks still charged interest from borrowers which they paid to depositors, when it was not depositors money that they lent, the Bank of England replied that the morality of commercial bank practices was not their responsibility.

The real value they held, namely deposited collateral real value, became ignored in their accounting.

The Way Back to Functional Reality

In order to restore an understandable and workable system, we must return to the point where real valuables are “deposited” with banks, and bank “value notes” are only issued to these collateral depositors to the limit of real value held.

This ensures that there is a direct accountability between each depositor of real collateral value, and the money he creates against that value.

Banks would account real deposit value held against money issued for each depositor, such that in the event that the money was not returned for cancellation by the bank, by the depositor, the collateral could be sold by the bank to retrieve the money that way.

All safe and secure.

Banks would act as professional book keepers and would charge competitive fees for any activity they perform, with no “interest” involved in any activity.

Real value offered as collateral for banks to create money against can be any durable valuable, traditionally gold and silver, but clearly insured property holds value in the marketplace, and as an essential component of life for most, and with it’s potential for adding value to itself, it is collateral of choice for most.

Now that the ownership and current value of property can be secured for all to rely on via blockchain technology, we have an ideal medium and mechanism for any property owner to register how much money he has created against the value of that property, entirely free of “interest”, with that charge against that particular property at any time being secured, to be removed as part of the eventual sale of that property in due course.

Thus the concepts of “mortgage” and “equity release” become merged in one secure account unpolluted by any notion of interest.

Each homeowner has his own stable and secure banking system in the varying equity he decides to invest in his home.

Indeed, there is no theoretical reason preventing the development of property via the creation of money from the developing value itself, i.e. provided the developing market value always runs ahead of the money created to construct it, the property can just remain with the money needed to construct it as a charge awaiting cancellation at the sale of the property.

Banking would thus become secure and paid for in fees for a professional book keeping service.

Property and home ownership would be available for all.

By engaging and managing the real market value in his home, any property owner has the potential to release this value and buy it back as he needs to fund his life.



Continue your banking education with this video or research yourself by searching for “state land banks”: What are Land Banks & How to they work?

Psychological Warfare Hoisted on the World by CIA and U. S. Military

Earlier this week, the miners pulled up these truth nuggets.

CIA, Five Eyes, London, Pilgrims, and Bill Donovan

We checked with the AFI mines to see what else they found and WOWZER – TRUTH HISTORY is making a come-back.

In no particular order, this is what they discovered:


This source file is the downloaded version. The links below are bookmarked to the three-letter version.


Note: When we read that Donovan was overseeing psychological warfare in Europe and Japan, read the British Pilgrims Society. Remember he had his own separate communications system (probably those antenna arrays in Pirbright on Baron Henry De Worms Lord Pirbright/Rothschild property)

AFI. (Feb. 20, 2020). Coronavirus uncovers Rothschild Lord Pirbright as key to the 140-yr. secret monopoly of the Pilgrims Society. Americans for Innovation.


The OSS/Donovan had his own encryption system

SECRET: Nov. 02, 1942, declassified Sep. 14, 2014

Pilgrims OSS Wild Bill Donovan was given full control of psychological warfare functions (via RCA, NBC, AT&T, New York Times, etc.) due to his “own knowledge of military developments and his sense of the needs of modern total war.”

In short the British Pilgrims Society ran U.S. psychological warfare.

Donovan was the Pilgrims Society director of psychological warfare and had near full influence over FDR, Eisenhower, Stimson, and Marshall

p. 413

p. 346

p. 354


PDF p. 338

p. 356

p. 369

Donovan supplied and trained Chinese in special operations.

Do you think the OSS/CIA just walked away from this power and control?

p. 374

Pilgrim Donovan and Pilgrim Marshall were closely coordinating with Pilgrims Britain.

p. 375

Pilgrims Donovan promoted the British point of view consistently in these meetings.

p. 386


Aug. 17, 1942, Agreement between the OSS and the SOE (British Special Operations Executive)

p. 389


Donovan trained British SOE agents.

p. 400


Donovan personally oversaw the CIA stay behind agents during the war.

p. 401


The Fake New Spin begins:

p. 405


Ran Psychological Warfare out of Donovan’s office, p. 348



A few remarks regarding the miners’ newest finds:



Then we have these STUPID, SLOW “investigative reporters” like Sharyl Attkinsson keeping the full depth of the corruption from being known. Is she protecting Pilgrim-Pirbright’s operations or is Sharyl just another propagandist…or slow and stupid?

See Sharyl’s lame report from our Gab post. Then share..


How many presstitutes do you watch who are trained in and controlled by the CIA PROPAGANDA SCHOOL?


Now…back to the real research, the kind that none of these CIA Mockingbird propagandists dare to reveal to the public.

Breaking: FDR and William “Wild Bill” Donovan (both Pilgrims Society members) hid the Pilgrims Society creation of “Five Eyes” with the British (on Mar. 05, 1946) from Congress, and created the C.I.A. in parallel.

  • Whitewashed CIA history that every American must learn for the first time
  • Our C.I.A. spies are ALL run by globalists determined to undermine the American Republic since the beginning of the 20th century

CIA Chronology re. William J. Donovan. (Feb. 03, 1970). Copied from Darling History, Feb. 03, 1970 [silent on Mar. 05, 1946 British Pilgrims Society Five Eyes creation – the Special Relationship], declassified Aug. 11, 2011, CIA-RDP09K00541R000700100002-4. CIA FOIA.

You Think the NSA Is Bad? Meet Former CIA Director Allen Dulles. – Mother  JonesThe CIA propagandist in this document catalogued many things about Allen W. Dulles, but somehow missed the elephants in the room. This is scandalous “history” held SECRET since 1962 and only declassified/published in 2013—49 years the lies were concealed:

ERRATA: This history censors critical facts about Dulles, including:

  1. Membership in the subversive British Pilgrims Society;
  2. Conspiracy with the British Pilgrims and MI6 to established a parallel intelligence operation (parallel to the CIA, FBI, NSA) later called “Five Eyes” on Mar. 05, 1946—the so-called “special relationship”;
  3. Theft of stolen German and Japanese gold and treasure and its movement to Pilgrims banks in Switzerland that bankrolled today’s multinational corporations and banks;
  4. Post-war organization of the Bank for International Settlements, Switzerland;
  5. Political and banking conspiracies with William J. Donovan surrounding organization of the Marshall Plan;
  6. Organizing the JFK assassination; and
  7. Member of the Warren Commission covering up the CIA assassination. 


These omissions are evidence of censorship on a massive, scandalous, criminal scale, since no honest, professional  historian would miss so many important elements in a person’s life.

Allen Welsh Dulles. (Jan. 01, 1962). Allen Welsh Dulles Director of Central Intelligence, bibliography and timeline, declassified and published, Dec. 23, 2016. CIA-RDP67-00318R000100170002-8. CIA.

Note: The Office of Strategic Services (O.S.S.) was created by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on Jun. 13, 1942 and William J. Donovan was put in charge. One of Donovan’s key step-and-fetch-it boys was Allen Welsh Dulles. Note that six months later, on Dec. 07, 1942, Roosevelt confiscated over 50,000 patents of inventors who lived in Axis and Axis occupied countries… for his fellow British Pilgrims Society globalist corporations.

See AFI. (Apr. 17, 2020). PART ONE: NBC founder & Pilgrim David Sarnoff led the Imperial British agenda that has terrorized our world for over 100 years. Americans for Innovation.

Dulles was president of the thoroughly British Pilgrims Society Council on Foreign Relations (1950), founded by Elihu Root who was:

  • The Inquiry/Council on Foreign Relations, founding chairman (1917-18)
  • U.S. Secretary of War (1899-1904)
  • U.S. Secretary of State (1905-09)
  • N.Y. Senator (1909-15)
  • Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, first president (1910-25) (the same group that stole encryption for the FBI in 1993 under Clinton organized by Podesta and Chandler
  • American Law Institute
  • Nobel Prize (1912)
  • Personal attorney to John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie

Both Root and Dulles were dutiful subjects of the British monarchy, its controlling Pilgrims Society, and its “new [British] world order,” no question.

Historians like to whitewash this truth by calling them “Anglophiles.” Americans should call them traitors.

How Stupid is Senator Josh Hawley?

Today President Trump tweeted this note from his ‘desk’ blog:

The Tyranny of Big Tech, a whopping 200 pages of Pilgrims propaganda … that or Hawley is about as stupid as any Missouri hick we ever met and we know a few because Douglas was born and raised in the Ozarks. Hawley, the poor researcher that he shows himself to be, says nothing about AIMCat favorites MICHAEL MCKIBBEN and LEADER TECHNOLOGIES!! Hawley, or his pathetic ghost writer, makes no mention of the theft of social media.

Hawley is FOE to the American people and trying desperately to be like ‘Optech’ Mitt Romney.

Help us out and make sure to include a special note (or use the handy link below) to Mr. Romney-wanna-be in any book review you do on his piece of fiction.

Facebook Unmasked: How the World’s Most Relevant Entrepreneur Was Screwed By Zuckerberg


Enlighten your downline about Josh ‘Hee-Haw’ Hawley and his phony-baloney narrative about social media and big tech tyranny.

The meme should read “Sen. Josh Hawley”

British are not friends of the American Republic

Below are citations to two critical 3-year old pieces of research that get underneath the U.S. vote-rigging operation run by the British Pilgrims Society from London. Clue that this is real, if you are having trouble with believing the British are not friends of the American Republic:

(Sir) Henry Kissinger and Paul Volcker became vice presidents of the Pilgrims Society in 2007 in NY before the 2008 bank bailout.

(Sir) Caspar Weinberger was a Pilgrim and Pilgrim Mike Pompeo’s handler.

Facebook’s chairman and Zuckerberg handler James W. Breyer is a Pilgrim.

(Sir) John G. Roberts, Jr. is a British Knight of Malta (English Priory)—a de facto Pilgrim.

Facebook propaganda worldwide is now run by Pilgrims Sir Nick Clegg (former British deputy prime minister) and Baron Richard Allan (grandfather was British propaganda chief of staff in WWII).

C.I.A. Director George Tenet was a director of the Queen’s QinetiQ intelligence/propaganda operation, as was former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Edmund Giamastiani.

QinetiQ was formed in 2001 with American Carlyle Group funding before being handed over to the Queen. (G.H.W. Bush – a Pilgrim, helped found Carlyle which feeds the Pilgrims Society’s war mongering global military-industrial enterprise.

Outrageously, QinetiQ handles the inventory system for the entire U.S. Army—worldwide.


The Deep State = the British Pilgrims Society. Mountains of hard proofs can be provided, or accessed from the AFI Blog Archive and AIM for Truth.

America’s ship of state has been boarded.

AFI. (Jun 03, 2018). Part I: Sir Geoffrey Pattie – Spy-gate is directed by the Crown’s courtiers in the UK, not by Russia. Americans for Innovation.

AFI. (Jul. 20, 2018). Part II: Lord Mark Malloch-Brown – The globalist racketeer kingpin running the Queen’s Privy Council with George Soros. Americans for Innovation.

This Spy-gate track of research emerged while investigating the origins of Cambridge Analytical.

Cambridge Analytica is a subsidiary of Strategic Communications Laboratory UK (SCL) founded by Sir Geoffrey Pattie.

SCL’s website actually boasted how they have overturned (“bend”) elections all over the world.

Pattie was instrumental in RCA/NBC/Marconi Wireless/British Telecom/ICI and their emergence in the US space program of Lockheed, Boeing and British Aerospace in alliance with British and American telecommunications and patent-weaponization infrastructure with the U.S. DoD Office of Net Assessments/Highland Group (run by the SES warlord Andrew Marshall since the Carter Administration).

Pattie was minister of foreign trade in charge of the Queen’s Golden Shares, which are her 100% control of critical British infrastructure companies like Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), Lockheed, Rio Tinto, SERCO, QintetiQ, The Pirbright Institute (pharma-eugenics with Rothschild-Gates-Wellcome Trusts biotech funding).

SERCO and QintetiQ have over $15 billion in U.S. defense contracts. SERCO was given the US Patent Office to run. Pirbright holds the Coronavirus patent and is run by the former chief of British MI5, Baroness Elizabeth Manningham-Bueller.

You cannot make this stuff up.

Fauci is a Pilgrim–which does not mean Plymouth Pilgrims–but was intentionally chosen to fool Americans. It means trans-Atlantic travel among the self-anointed Pilgrims Society elites. The Uni-Party are all Pilgrims and their sycophants. When Biden said he is an “Atlanticist,” he means Pilgrims Society. No question.

When one understands that the alt-media’s favorite whipping boy George Soros is a British Pilgrims Society member, the threads start weaving themselves together.

Vaccinated Zombies will Kill Off Humanity

Post by Jim Stone



I am so scared by this my brain is jamming and I am not coding right. I am fixing the coding errors now.

Download from original source

Download from my server



Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:

1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.
2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: have babies that have cognitive difficulties.

This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English: Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer safety within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”

TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.

THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.

Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.
Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.

Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer:
Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy

8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting? If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?

That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.

The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy).

* If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention.

* If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome. The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form. In the case of a live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported). Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows:

* Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;

* Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify developmental delays). In the case of paternal exposure, the investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator must document in the source documents that the participant was given the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:

* A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.

* A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.
Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand: Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.


An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer safety within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.

My comment: This is why we have green screen Biden. They are ALL green screen now, we just caught Biden. They are green screen and working from sets because they have opened Pandora’s box and intend to hide out until everything is finished. This is why many people are claiming the white house is empty and that they are working from a set ad are not actually there. Because they are not there. If they do ever go on camera, they are not where they say they are.
India is having their disaster happen now because they started with the vaxxes first, and have more people vaxxed than any other country.


VIDEO David Icke and Celest Solum – Your body becomes a bio-reactor with these zombie bioweapons.



Listen to Clif High describe vaxxidents in this video: VAXXXIDENTS – EXPLORERS’ GUIDE TO SCIFI WORLD


Medical Report Shows ‘Deceptology’ in Vaccine Science


Deceptology in cancer and vaccine sciences: Seeds of immune destruction‐mini electric shocks in mitochondria: Neuroplasticity‐electrobiology of response profiles and increased induced diseases in four generations – A hypothesis

“From Rockefeller’s support of patent medicine to Gates’ patent vaccines, medical establishment invested a great deal in intellectual ignorance. Through the control over medical education and research it has created a public illusion to prop up corporate profit and encouraged the lust for money and power. An overview of data on cancer and vaccine sciences, the status of Americans’ health, a survey of repeated failed projects, economic toxicity, and heavy drug consumption or addiction among young and old provide compelling evidence that in the twentieth century nearly all classic disease categories (congenital, inheritance, neonatal, or induced) shifted to increase induced diseases.

Examples of this deceptology in ignoring or minimizing, and mocking fundamental discoveries and theories in cancer and vaccine sciences are attacks on research showing that (a), effective immunity is responsible for defending and killing pathogens and defective cancerous cells, correcting and repairing genetic mutations; (b) viruses cause cancer; and (c), abnormal gene mutations are often the consequences of (and secondary to) disturbances in effective immunity. The outcomes of cancer reductionist approaches to therapies reveal failure rates of 90% (+/‐5) for solid tumors; loss of over 50 million lives and waste of $30‐50 trillions on too many worthless, out‐of‐focus, and irresponsible projects.” Continue reading. Full report as a PDF:

Inside the report you will find: