Category: Senior Executive Service

Analysis of DRAFT Executive Order for Social Media Bias

UNTRUSTWORTHINESS of those receiving the reporting (SES), other than the President.

The order names a number of players involved with evaluating the analysis (OMB, Treasury, etc.), including the President.

We show that all the agencies named, besides the President himself, are infested with the SES that must be countered.

Executive Order DRAFT. (Sep. 24, 2018). EXECUTIVE ORDER TO PROTECT COMPETITION AND SMALL BUSINESSES FROM BIAS IN ONLINE PLATFORMS. White House.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-09-24-Executive-Order-DRAFT-Protect-Against-Online-Bias-White-House-ca-Sep-24-2018.pdf

Executive order 1executive order 2

Clayton Act

Note that the PDF link at the top contains the active links to the references found on the flier.

.

Federal Bridge Certificate Authority is the Technical Platform for Senior Executive Service aka ‘Deep State’

The “Federal Bridge” public encryption key platform was set up in the early 1990’s under Bill Clinton to enable the spy agencies to tap into any cooperating computer system at any time. It was facilitated by the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) through the embedding of an “encryption backdoor key” (algorithm) called the Dual_EC_DRBG algorithm (Dual Elliptical Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generator).

It is a special mathematical formula for generating random numbers used for encryption – the NSA insisted on building in a flaw into this algorithm known only to them as a way to bypass all keys that were generated with this algorithm (ALL KEYS, EVERYWHERE). This NSA flaw in the encryption key is known to all insiders in the Deep State shadow government around the planet, we believe.

Here are properly formatted versions of the NIST Dual_EC_DRBG algorithm registry for required by the Department of Commerce on all hardware, software and firmware used outside the United States (EVERYTHING): HTML | PDF (Thank you to AFI researchers. It took eight hours to fix.)

figure 1 bridge

figure 2 bridge
Company Overview. (2003). Entrust – Securing Digital Identities & Information. The Federal Bridge: A Foundation of Trust. Entrust.
This infrastructure supports the Walker patents’ “Mass Data” surveillance grid.                     Human beings are described as “wet-ware” for The Internet of Things in the Walker patents. U.S. Patent No. 6,965,816.

Relevant Timeline entries showing that the Federal Bridge is the encryption key sharing architecture that enabled the Deep State shadow government (Senior Executive Services – SES) to hack/tap into any computer or phone, anywhere, anytime… and they have been able to do so since the early 1990’s. Robert S. Mueller, III has all information on all us “wet-ware” humans on the planet since the early 1990’s.

TIMELINE 

1993 Clinton’s FBI encryption backdoor key endorsed by the Carnegie Endowment for Peace, John Podesta, James P. Chandler, III

1994 FEDERAL BRIDGE – ENTRUST PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) monopoly (see below)

1994 Clinton secures high tech rare earth mines in Congo and Rwanda using genocide pretext

1994 Clinton Chronicles documentary released proving Clinton’s racketeering, drug smuggling, money laundering, Rose law firm

1995 Highlands Group created by DoD to coordinate illegal public-private spy partnerships off the record; decisions used as pretext

1997 FEDERAL BRIDGE – ENTRUST PMI Portal Access (Privileged Management Infrastructure) monopoly (see below)

1998 HP engineer Richard C. Walker starts filing a string of patent for “The Internet of Things”; lays out a global spy grid

1998 George Soros told CBS that he did not regret working with the Nazis against his fellow Jews in Hungary

1998-1999 Kosovo War used to clear out Christian Serbs from Kosovo to create unimpeded land route for planned coming Soros-funded Muslim migration; created genocide as pretext, like in Rwanda

1999 FEDERAL BRIDGE – ENTRUST PKI for Wireless monopoly (see below)

1999 Precursor to SERCO (SI International) formed by ex-Lockheed executives

1999 Clinton formed CIA In-Q-Tel as a public-private spy technology funding entity, abolished Glass-Steagall banking controls; formed National Infrastructure Assurance Council (NIAC) to run mass surveillance on all Americans from the White House

2000 NSA architect William Binney resigned; observed that NSA had “gone rogue”

2001 Clinton appointed James P. Chandler, III and Microsoft’s Bill Gates to National Infrastructure Assurance Council (NIAC) as he departs the White House

2001 In June, CIA whistleblower Susan Landauer warned of World Trade Center attack using airplanes; she was imprisoned without trial

2001 In July, operation “Stellar Wind” to spy on all Americans was approved by DOJ

2001 On Sep. 04, 2011, Robert S. Mueller, III was sworn in as Baby Bush FBI director

2001 9/11 used as pretext for Patriot Act takeover of American privacy and property Bill of Rights

2001 FEDERAL BRIDGE – ENTRUST Enhanced Internet Security PKI monopoly excuse following 9/11 (see below) 

Conclusion: The Federal Bridge, aka Federal Bridge Certificate Authority was the Deep State shadow government, aka Senior Executive Service (SES)’s actual technical platform for how computer systems across the Internet could allow the spy state to tap into any system in real time.

Company Overview. (2003). Entrust – Securing Digital Identities & Information. The Federal Bridge: A Foundation of Trust. Entrust.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2003-Company-Overview-Entrust-Securing-Digital-Identities-and-Information-The-Federal-Bridge-A-Foundation-of-Trust-Entrust-2003.pdf

entrust 1Entrust 2Entrust 3.JPG

Make sure to review our ongoing updates to this research:

Organization and Communication Structure of the Swamp Uncovered

 

 

It’s a Total Knock Out for Trump

It’s a Total Knock Out for Trump

.

Articles discussed in the audio above are:

Pentagon, State alumni join Brennan clearance outcry

.

SES logoDeep State – Shadow Government Revealed: Senior Executive Service

Obama Spied on Trump

Obama Spied on Candidate and President Donald J. Trump

The articles below were referenced in this audio.

The Assassination Attempts

.

 

SES Star Chamber Protects Assassination Attempt of the President

 

 

Just a little reminder of Clinton’s Pay-to-Play which is one of the things the Mueller Investigation is trying to hide

Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton’s State Department

.

Sally Moyer

Are Swamp Operatives Just Plain Stupid?

SES Star Chamber Protects Assassination Attempt of the President

The SES Star Chamber Explained. As you listen to the audio, you can read the relevant text of the IG Report below.

A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election Oversight and Review Division 18-04 June 2018

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

CHAPTER SIXTEEN: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

First, we found that several FBI employees who played critical roles in the investigation sent political messagessome of which related directly to the Midyear investigation—that created the appearance of bias and thereby raised questions about the objectivity and thoroughness of the Midyear investigation.

Even more seriously, text messages between Strzok and Page pertaining to the Russia investigation, particularly a text message from Strzok on August 8 stating “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” in response to a Page text “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!,” are not only indicative of a biased state of mind but imply a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects.

This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice. While we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed in Chapter Five, the conduct by these employees cast a cloud over the entire FBI investigation and sowed doubt about the FBI’s work on, and its handling of, the Midyear investigation.

It also called into question Strzok’s failure in October 2016 to follow up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop. The damage caused by these employees’ actions extends far beyond the scope of the Midyear investigation and goes to the heart of the FBI’s reputation for neutral factfinding and political independence.

Second, in key moments, then Director Comey chose to deviate from the FBI’s and the Department’s established procedures and norms and instead engaged in his own subjective, ad hoc decision making. In so doing, we found that Comey largely based his decisions on what he believed was in the FBI’s institutional interests and would enable him to continue to effectively lead the FBI as its Director.

While we did not find that these decisions were the result of political bias on Comey’s part, we nevertheless concluded that by departing so clearly and dramatically from FBI and Department norms, the decisions negatively impacted the perception of the FBI and the Department as fair administrators of justice. 498 Moreover, these decisions usurped the authority of the Attorney General and upset the well-established separation between investigative and prosecutorial functions and the accountability principles that guide law enforcement decisions in the United States.

As we further outline in this report, there was a troubling lack of any direct, substantive communication between Comey and then Attorney General Lynch in advance of both Comey’s July 5 press conference and his October 28 letter to Congress. With regard to the July 5 events, Comey affirmatively concealed his intentions from Lynch. When he did finally call her on the morning of July 5—after the FBI first notified the press—he told her that he was going to be speaking about the Midyear investigation but that he would not answer any of her questions, and would not tell her what he planned to say. During that call, Lynch did not instruct Comey to tell her what he intended to say at the press conference.

With respect to the October 28 letter, Comey chose not to contact Lynch or then Deputy Attorney General Yates directly; rather, he had FBI Chief of Staff Rybicki advise Yates’s senior advisor (then PADAG Axelrod) that Comey intended to send a letter to Congress and that Comey believed he had an obligation to do so. Given these circumstances, Lynch and Yates concluded it would be counterproductive to speak directly with Comey and that the most effective way to communicate their strong opposition to Comey about his decision was to relay their views to him through Axelrod and Rybicki.

We found it extraordinary that, in advance of two such consequential decisions, the FBI Director decided that the best course of conduct was to not speak directly and substantively with the Attorney General about how best to navigate these decisions and mitigate the resulting harms, and that Comey’s decision resulted in the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General concluding that it would be counterproductive to speak directly with the FBI Director.

This is not the first time the Department and the FBI have conducted a politically-charged investigation, and it will not be the last. To protect the institutions from allegations of abuse, political interference, and biased enforcement of the law, the Department and the FBI have developed policies and practices to guide their decisions. In the vast majority of cases, they are followed as a matter of routine. But they are most important to follow when the stakes are the highest, and when the pressures to divert from them—often based on well-founded concerns and highly fraught scenarios—are the greatest. No rule, policy, or practice is perfect, but at the same time, neither is any individual’s ability to make judgments under pressure or in what may seem like unique circumstances.

It is in these moments—when the rationale for keeping to the ordinary course fades from view and the temptation to make an exception is greatest—that the bedrock principles and time-tested practices of the Department and the FBI can serve their highest purpose.

Instant Messages between Agent 1 and Agent 5 Agent 1 is an experienced counterintelligence agent and was assigned to the Midyear investigative team from August 2015 through the conclusion of the investigation. Agent 1 was one of four agents responsible for the day-to-day activities of the Midyear investigation. Agent 1’s duties included conducting witness interviews and Agent 1 was one of the two agents who interviewed former Secretary Clinton on July 2. Agent 5 is also an experienced counterintelligence agent and was a member of the Midyear filter team. As a member of the filter team, Agent 5 was responsible for identifying privileged communications among the materials obtained by the FBI to ensure that they were not reviewed by the investigative team.

Neither Agent 1 nor Agent 5 was assigned to the FBI’s Russia investigation or the Special Counsel investigation. As noted previously, we identified instant messages sent by Agent 1, often to Agent 5, that expressed opinions critical of the conduct and quality of the Midyear investigation. We discussed these message in Chapter Five. In addition to those messages, we identified two instant message exchanges that appeared to combine a discussion of politics with a discussion of the Midyear investigation. We also identified instant messages between Agent 1 and Agent 5 that expressed support for Clinton and hostility toward Trump. We discuss these messages in this section, along with explanations provided by Agent 1 and Agent

Because it is relevant to their explanations, we note that Agent 1 and Agent 5, who are now married, were in a personal relationship that predated their assignment to the Midyear investigation. 1. Instant Messages Referencing the Midyear Investigation On July 6, 2016, the day after Comey’s Midyear declination announcement, Agent 1 and an FBI employee not involved with Midyear exchanged messages about the investigation. During the course of this discussion, Agent 1 described the prior weekend’s activities, which included the interview of Clinton. A portion of this 411 instant message exchange follows.

The sender of each message is noted after the timestamp.206 15:07:41, Agent 1: “…I’m done interviewing the President – then type the 302. 18 hour day….” 15:13:32, FBI Employee: “you interviewed the president?” 15:17:09, Agent 1: “you know – HRC” [Hillary Rodham Clinton] 15:17:18, Agent 1: “future pres” 15:17:22, Agent 1: “Trump cant win” 15:17:31, Agent 1: “demographics dont line up” 15:17:37, Agent 1: “America has changed”

We asked Agent 1 if he thought of Clinton as the next president while conducting the Midyear investigation. Agent 1 stated, “I think my impression going into the election in that personal realm is that all of the polls were favoring Hillary Clinton.” We asked Agent 1 if he treated Clinton differently because of this assumption. Agent 1 stated, “Absolutely not. I think the message they said that our leadership told us and our actions were to find whatever was there and whatever, whatever that means is what it means.” Comey sent the first letter to Congress about the Weiner laptop discovery on October 28, 2016.

Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged instant messages about the letter and Trump’s reaction to it later that day. The sender of each messages is noted after the timestamp. 13:46:48, Agent 5: “jesus christ… Trump: Glad FBI is fixing ‘horrible mistake’ on clinton emails… for fuck’s sake.” 13:47:27, Agent 5: “the fuck’s sake part was me, the rest was Trump.” 13:49:07, Agent 1: “Not sure if Trump or the fifth floor is worse…” 13:49:22, Agent 5: “I’m so sick of both…” 13:50:25, Agent 5: “+o( TRUMP”207 13:50:30, Agent 5: “+o( Fifth floor” 13:50:34, Agent 5: “+o( FBI” 13:50:44, Agent 5: “+o( Average American public” 206 All instant messages produced to the OIG reflected Greenwich Mean Time.

We have corrected times to the Eastern Time Zone as a result. In addition, some instant messages contained emojis, which we omitted unless they affected the meaning of the message. We also do not include other intervening instant messages unless they contribute to understanding the highlighted messages. 207 The symbol used in these messages is a “sick face” emoticon. See IM Emoticons, at http://sheet.shiar.nl/emoji (last accessed April 28, 2018). 412 We asked both Agent 1 and Agent 5 about these messages. Agent 1 and Agent 5 both stated the reference to “fifth floor” referred to the location of the FBI WFO’s Counterintelligence Division. Agent 1 continued: “Again, you know, I think a general, general theme in a lot of this is some personal comment, or, you know, complaining about common topics and leadership and, and venting.”

Agent 5 also described this as general complaining to Agent 1 and also as an example of her being “very tired of working” these types of cases. Agent 5 also noted that she was not involved in the review of the Weiner laptop.

Instant Messages Commenting on Trump or Clinton On August 29, 2016, Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged the following instant messages as part of a discussion about their jobs. The sender of each message is noted after the timestamp. 10:39:49, Agent 1: “I find anyone who enjoys [this job] an absolute fucking idiot.

If you dont think so, ask them one more question. Who are you voting for? I guarantee you it will be Donald Drumpf.” 10:40:13, Agent 5: “i forgot about drumpf…” 10:40:27, Agent 5: “that’s so sad and pathetic if they want to vote for him.” 10:40:43, Agent 5: “someone who can’t answer a question” 10:40:51, Agent 5: “someone who can’t be professional for even a second” On September 9, 2016, Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged the following instant messages. 08:56:43, Agent 5: “i’m trying to think of a ‘would i rather’ instead of spending time with those people” 08:56:54, Agent 1: “stick your tongue in a fan??” 08:56:58, Agent 5: “i would rather have brunch with trump” 08:57:03, Agent 1: “ha” 08:57:15, Agent 1: “french toast with drumpf” 08:57:19, Agent 5: “i would rather have brunch with trump and a bunch of his supporters like the ones from ohio that are retarded” 08:57:23, Agent 5: “:)” Agent 5 told the OIG these instant messages “referenced TV programming and commentary that Agent 1 and Agent 5 had recently viewed together.”

Agent 5 continued, “The reference was not a general statement about a particular part of the country, rather it was in jest and pertained to individuals’ inability to articulate any reason why they so strongly favored one candidate over another.” 413 On Election Day on November 8, 2016, Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged the following instant messages. 14:21:10, Agent 1: “You think HRC is gonna win right? You think we should get nails and some boards in case she doesnt” 14:21:56, Agent 5: “she better win… otherwise i’m gonna be walking around with both of my guns.” 14:22:05, Agent 5: “and likely quitting on the spot” 14:28:43, Agent 1: “You should know;…..” 14:28:45, Agent 1: “that” 14:28:50, Agent 1: “I’m…..” 14:28:56, Agent 1: “with her.” 14:28:58, Agent 1: “ooooooooooooooooooo” 14:29:02, Agent 1: “show me the money” 14:29:03, Agent 5: “

Who is Catherine Austin Fitts?

Catherine Austin Fitts is a frequent guest on alternative media sites like Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog or the Dark Journalist. If you don’t know her, she is the woman who reports the trillions of dollars missing at the Pentagon. Her claims started out as $21 trillion missing and now she claims it is $50 trillion.

What do we know about Fitts other than what she and Hunter tell us? We did our own digging into her background and found that it didn’t pass the “truth test”.

Fitts’ HUD title (the way she reports it in her online profile) first appeared in the 1992 Plum Book for the Daddy Bush presidency.

Fitts needs to explain why she is not listed in the 1992 Plum Book, and when exactly (dates) she was hired and fired from her HUD position. She also needs to disclose whether she now draws an SES pension or if she is being paid by SES or Serco in other capacities.

Catherine  Austin Fitts’ Wikipedia says of her federal employment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Austin_Fitts

catherine background

George H. W. Bush served as President between 1989-1993. Therefore, the SES people would be listed in the 1992 Plum Book.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/1992-11-10-S-Prt-102-509-Plum-Book-Policy-and-Supporting-Positions-Committee-on-Governmental-Affairs-102d-Congress-2d-Session-Y4G74-7-9-S-Prt-102-509-ISBN-0-16-039526-7-GPO-Nov-10-1992.pdf#page=84

However, while that position is listed as an SES job, Catherine Fitts is not listed in that position on p. 84, a Arthur J. Hill is:

p. 84

Housing SES

Arthur J. Hill’s Bloomberg bio says that he formed his investment company in 1993, just after Bush resigned and Clinton was installed. Which likely means he served as Commissioner until Bush left office.

https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=1169431&privcapId=104883551

Now the mystery, where is Catherine Austin Fitts’ disclosure in the position that Arthur J. Hill held?

Arthur J. Hill’s predecessor as listed in the 1988 Plum Book, p. 91 was THOMAS T. DEMERY:

Housing SES 2

Arthur J. Hill’s replacement as listed in the 1996 Plum Book, p. 160 was Nicholas P. Retsinas:

SES housing roster

Where in the world was Catherine Austin Fitts in the Plum Book? The position she claims to have held is definitely a top SES position.

.

Did Catherine Austin Fitts hold the position as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner? Or is she a fake, phony fraud?

If she held this position, why doesn’t her name show up in the Plum Books?

Greg HunterDo the YouTube channels that host her as a guest know that her background doesn’t check out with the Conclave researchers, or are they part of the propaganda network on YouTube?

Surely, if Greg Hunter knew this he would inform his audience that we are unable to verify Catherine’s HUD position claims. Unless he, too,…….(sigh)

We welcome official verification that Fitts is who she claims to be and we will be happy to correct the story and let our readers know.

(June 19, 2018)  Note to readers and follow up: We have received emails from folks with their opinions and anecdotal info about Catherine. We will not post these as they do not offer the information we are looking for. Let’s be specific:

  1. Fitts claims a specific title of former occupation to her Solari clients and viewers. This appears on her Wikipedia page, her website, and numerous self-testimonies on YouTube channels.
  2. This occupation is a Senior Executive Service position as shown by the Plum Books.
  3. Fitts is not mentioned in the official books to have ever held that title.

Is she who she claims to be? Not looking for opinions here. Just the hard core evidence and we don’t see any. And if she is a former SES operative, then we would like to bring to your attention many other questions we have about her narrative.

FULL DISCLOSURE: We fondly remember the interview we did with Fitts’ associate Harry Blazer in this blockbuster interview, available as a transcript.

Anatomy of the Deep State

Senior Executive Service Employees Get Red-Pilled!

Mulvaney and Trump just kicked Senior Executive Service out of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

We warned SES employees that they needed to get out…fast. We said: Take your early retirement and run out of the Swamp as fast as you can before Trump fires you and you have nothing. We know how you have been obstructing the United States government and you need to leave. 

 

SERCO beginning

……but on another front, American Patriots have a set back with this announcement below. Was it another no-bid contract awarded by Senior Executive Service operatives to the Crown-owned and operated Serco? When are we going to clear out these globalist operatives from our government?

Queen Elizabeth’s Serco secures US health insurance eligibility support contract valued at $900m USD

Serco has been awarded a contract to continue to support eligibility determinations for citizens purchasing health insurance through the Federal Health Insurance Exchanges. The contract has a one-year base period and four one-year option periods, with an estimated total value to Serco, subject to workload volumes, of approximately $900m if all option years are exercised.

Rupert Soames, Serco Group Chief Executive, said: “Serco has developed a strong working partnership with CMS to provide it with vital consumer eligibility services.”

Name sound familiar? Who is Rupert Soames?

Soames and Gardner

.

Lizzard queenWhy is this important to average, everyday Americans?

Because SES bottomfeeders continue to award Serco no-bid, lucrative contracts to operate the U.S. government.

Serco is controlled by the Queen of England and her merry men, like Rupert Soames and Geoffrey Pattie, in the Privy Council.

Bottom line: SES operatives run America on behalf of Queen Lizzie.

SES Fleeces America with No-Bid Contracts to Serco

Mulvaney and Trump just kicked SES out of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

On June 6, 2018 we featured this headline on Truth News Headlines

Mulvaney fires all 25 members of CFPB’s advisory board

We reminded our readers of Executive Order 13781 of March 13, 2017 which announced that the President wanted to improve efficiencies and accountability in the Executive Branch.

Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch

Executive order 13781

We are now starting to see the results of this order.

But what The Washington Examiner didn’t report is that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is (has been until now?) totally run by Senior Executive Service.

See Plum Book 2016, PDF pp. 161-162 (scroll to the bottom of p. 161 to find the first listing, Richard A. Cordray, Director)

Curious correlation. At the end of 2016, the Plum Book listed 27 persons

22 people listed by name

5 not listed by name, but as Career Incumbent (do = ditto)

2 not list by name, but as Vacant

Accounting for attrition since 2016, looks like Mulvaney/Trump just kicked the SES out of Consumer Protection!

Plum Book 2016, PDF pp. 161-162

CFPB

Consumer Product Safety

See https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2016-12-01-S-Prt-114-26-Plum-Book-Policy-and-Supporting-Positions-Committee-on-Homeland-Security-and-Governmental-Affairs-US-Senate-114th-Congress-2d-Session-GPO-Dec-01-2016.pdf#page=161

.

red-pill-2

Late to class and have no clue what Senior Executive Service is? Then do your homework below and take a big gulp of water with that red pill.

Deep State – Shadow Government Revealed: Senior Executive Service

.

THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT USES SES, SERCO, AND OPIC AS PORTALS INTO UNSPEAKABLE CORRUPTION

 

SES SERCO “Wet-Ware” Soft Kill Plan Has Begun

In the audio below, Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben discuss how Serco companies work with the SES Deep State shadow government to implement 5G, and then manage the societal effects of their coming mass murder program. That’s why Serco runs FEMA camps, owns pathology companies, houses migrants, owns laundries, operates prisons, provides transport and rail, run hospitals and leisure centers, builds ships and space technology—to zap the populace with 5G like a mosquito zapper, then handle the clean up.

Click the headline below to access the full report:

SES SERCO “WET-WARE” SOFT KILL PLAN IS HAPPENING, BUT CAN BE STOPPED: DEFUND THEM, NOW!

.

Plans to kill off 75% of humanity by sterilizing us & frying our brains with 5G irradiation from Musk, Schmidt, Qualcomm, Amazon satellites

.

5G has no purpose but to control or kill world population

 

Serco soft kill

SES-Serco

To learn more about 5G, the Golden Share, Serco, and SES, please see below:

You Are Wetware and Will be Controlled

.

Weaponized Cell Towers and Cellphones: 21st Century’s Silent, Invisible Killer by Design

.

How 5G Will Kill the Birds, Bees, and Your Loved Ones

.

How to Antidote EMFs and 5G

.

THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT USES SES, SERCO, AND OPIC AS PORTALS INTO UNSPEAKABLE CORRUPTION

.

EXPOSED: All the Queen’s Agents and Corporations that Control the World

.

Tentacles of SERCO Strangle America

 

 

 

BUSTED. Dabney Friedrich Just Another SES Deep State Player

dabney in plum book

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dabney_L._Friedrich

https://ballotpedia.org/Dabney_Friedrich

https://www.congress.gov/nomination/115th-congress/587

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/07/25/2017/nominations

https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/government/friedrich-bio.html

Latham & Watkins LLP is James W. Breyer’s firm / Accel Partners / National Venture Capital Association / In-Q-Tel / CIA

dabney 1

Dabney Langhorne Friedrich (born June 19, 1967)[1] is a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. She previously served as a Member of the United States Sentencing Commission.

dabney 2

dabney 3

Served at the Sentencing Commission with Michael Horowitz

dabney 4

In 2006, Friedrich was appointed as a member of the United States Sentencing Commission, a position she held until 2016.[5] In that capacity, she helped establish sentencing policies and practices for the federal criminal justice system by promulgating guidelines for congressional review and recommending changes in criminal statutes.[6]

dabney 7

.

More:

https://wikivisually.com/wiki/Dabney_L._Friedrich

https://www.ussc.gov/about/who-we-are/commisioners/former-commissioner-information

(Horowitz and Friedrich served together)

https://www.ussc.gov/policymaking/meetings-hearings/notice-january-17-2007

dabney 5

dabney 6
https://books.google.com/books?id=9mJjk0pHWcwC&pg=PR1&lpg=PR1&dq=Dabney_L._Friedrich+and+michael+horowitz+sentencing&source=bl&ots=jGLrtA-9D9&sig=JDKGAxaSZk23ADX305BpLH2LK7E&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwja6vPvlfnaAhWLmlkKHd3HBxIQ6AEIOzAE#v=onepage&q=Dabney_L._Friedrich%20and%20michael%20horowitz%20sentencing&f=false

2017-07-25-Dabney-Langhorne-Friedrich-Patricia-Dabney-Langhorne-Questionnaire-for-Judicial-Nominees-Senate-Judiciary-Committee-Jul-25-2017

.

Dabney Langhorne Friedrich biography

Dabney L. Friedrich. (Jul. 25, 2017). Judiciary Committee Confirmation Questionnaire. U.S. Senate.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2017-07-25-Dabney-Langhorne-Friedrich-Patricia-Dabney-Langhorne-Questionnaire-for-Judicial-Nominees-Senate-Judiciary-Committee-Jul-25-2017.pdf

Dabney 8

dabney 9

dabney 10

.

Just received this from our FOIA to the Senate Judiciary Committee…   Now tell us she’s not a globalist!

Dabney L. Friedrich. (Jun. 02, 2017). Financial Disclosure and Questionnaire. Senate Judiciary Committee, released May 15, 2018. US Senate.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2017-06-02-Dabney-L-Friedrich-aka-Patricia-Dabney-Langhorne-Financial-Disclosure-2016-Confirmation-Statement-Senate-Judiciary-Committee-release-May-15-2018-submitted-Jun-02-2017.pdf

Quick observations:

  1. She worked at Cognizant before joining the DC District Court–a fully globalist enterprise that acquires tech companies in Borg-like fashion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognizant cognizant
  2. Before Cognizant she worked at Chevron.
  3. She reports $8.8 million in assets. That’s pretty good for a judge who has never held a real job and never published a single writing.
  4. Her $4.5 million in securities financial holdings are loaded with Deep State shadow government corruptocrats including Fidelity, Goldman Sachs, Cisco, IBM, Microsoft, +++Vanguard+++, Oracle, Credit Suisse, iShares, Morgan Stanley, Chevron, P&G, Coca Cola, JP Morgan, Exxon, Bank of America,
  5. She owns $2.5 million in real estate.

Conclusion: Judges and judge candidates like Dabney all become genius investors.