Category: Senior Executive Service

The BIG UGLY: Carbon Credit Tyranny Plan Exposed

Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben went so deep into the research mines that you might lose your breath with the staggering information they have to share with you.

SES Plan to Destroy America REVEALED – Carbon Credit Tyranny Plan Exposed

 

Then continue your citizen education with these links that show you the P R O O F of what the researchers found.

French company
“New World Order” globalists plan to take down the U.S. economy. Didn’t you get the memo?
https://tinyurl.com/y9k6yot2

.

macron carbon tax
https://tinyurl.com/y9k6yot2

.

Read the new findings in the updated Fig. 3 and Table 1

UK is the target of this French operation.

https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2018/12/facebook-no-name-sent-to-spook-markets.html#sopro-steria-group-2017-annual-report

SOPRO STERIA GROUP, FR50809. (Apr. 16, 2018). Filing AMF n° D.18-0329 dated April 13, 2018, Registration Document (2017), Annual Financial Report. Autorité Des Marchés Financiers.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-04-16-SOPRA-STERIA-GROUP-FR50809-AMF-n°-D-18-0329-Apr-13-2018-Reg-Doc-2017-Annual-Fin-Rprt-AMF-Apr-16-2018.pdf

chart 3chart 1raymond st giles

SOPRO STERIA GROUP, FR50809. (Apr. 16, 2018). Note 17, List of Group Companies, PDF pp. 192-194, Filing AMF n° D.18-0329 dated April 13, 2018, Registration Document (2017), Annual Financial Report. Autorité Des Marchés Financiers. PDF of List of Companies ONLY.  XLSX of List of Companies ONLY.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-04-16-SOPRA-STERIA-GROUP-FR50809-AMF-n%C2%B0-D-18-0329-Apr-13-2018-Reg-Doc-2017-Annual-Fin-Rprt-AMF-Apr-16-2018.pdf#page=192

.

French carbon credits software SOPRO STERIA designed HUDs information and telecom infrastructure (2012-2017), paid for by the U.S. taxpayer

Alert: Cassiopae US Inc, one of SOPRO STERIA GROUP’s (France, Carbon Credits) 100% controlled U.S. subsidiaries, had a 4-yr. $4.9 million GSA contract with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for “IT and Telecom Strategy and Architecture”, 12/13/2012 – 02/15/2017, Award ID: GS00T13AJC0002.

https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2018/12/facebook-no-name-sent-to-spook-markets.html#hud-threat-alert

carbon tax credit

https://www.usaspending.gov/#/award/15540394

cassiopae 2

.

threat alert

https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2018/12/facebook-no-name-sent-to-spook-markets.html#hud-threat-alert

.

Sopro 2

AXWAY SOFTWARE, FR00110405000. (Nov. 01-2018). Registration Document (2017), Annual Financial Report., AMF n° 2018DD582300. Autorité Des Marchés Financiers.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-11-01-AXWAY-SOFTWARE-NO-FR00110405000-Note-16-List-of-consolidated-companies-at-Dec-2017-PDF-p-163-AMF-n°-2018DD582300-Reg-Doc-2017-Ann-Fin-Rprt-AMF-pub-Nov-01-2018.pdf

AXWAY, INC. (2006-2015). 81 GSA contracts with DoD, DoI, DHS, NTSB, GSA, Treasury, DOC, DoT, DUNS 839849932. Compiled Dec. 07, 2018 (*.xlsx spreadsheet). USASpending.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-12-07-AXWAY-INC-(2006-2015)-81-GSA-contracts-with-DoD-DoI-DHS-NTSB-GSA-Treasury-DOC-DoT-DUNS-839849932-xlsx-spreadsheet-USASpending-compiled-Dec-07-2018.pdf

AXWAY, INC. (2006-2015). 81 GSA contracts with DoD, DoI, DHS, NTSB, GSA, Treasury, DOC, DoT, DUNS 839849932. Compiled Dec. 07, 2018 (*.xlsx spreadsheet). USASpending.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-12-07-AXWAY-INC-(2006-2015)-81-GSA-contracts-with-DoD-DoI-DHS-NTSB-GSA-Treasury-DOC-DoT-DUNS-839849932-xlsx-spreadsheet-USASpending-compiled-Dec-07-2018.xlsx

.

U. S. Patent Office and Justice John Roberts Support Lawlessness in America

Alien Invasion of America by Globalist Attorneys and Judges

 

Make sure everyone in your circle of influence knows that the U.S. Patent Office STEALS patents from inventors. We have posted much about this over the last year. They are run by British-owned SERCO. Once they steal your patent, good luck finding any thiefcourts to protect you. Until the U.S. Patent office is run by 100% American interests and supported by LAW AND ORDER from the highest court in the land, expect to be ripped-off, left penniless with hefty law suit fees, and permanently silenced in ever expressing your creation again.

Make sure all the entrepreneurs and inventors you know understand how corrupt this office is. The U. S. Patent Office does not protect property rights of inventors. Their attorneys hover over you like the vultures they are and STEAL your property and rights from you – all done very legalistically so that their corrupt courts can uphold their theft.

Just ask Justice John Roberts how he ruled in the Leader v Facebook case, all the while holding Facebook stock, never recusing himself from this huge conflict of interest. So it’s ok for a Supreme Court judge to grab his adopted children through illegal means, then rip off Leader Technologies, financially benefiting from Leader’s invention when its true inventor and courageous patriot Michael McKibben’s has never received anything for inventing this powerful internet tool of scalability.

Facebook Unmasked: How the World’s Most Relevant Entrepreneur Was Screwed by Zuckerberg

Keep in mind that globalists are like lizards. Energetically they are “reptile beings” with lack of imagination and creativity. James P. Chandler III, for example, is/was just a clever attorney, among a swamp of B. A. R. lizard beings, who stole patents from hard-working American entrepreneurs. Chandler never invented or created anything himself, except for teaching more attorneys how to steal from inventors.

Beware of patent attorneys

And who was under Chandler’s tutelage? Hillary Rodham Clinton, for one, a patent attorney, whose early work at Rose Law Firm was dedicated almost exclusively to intellectual property and patent infringement law.

And what is Hillary’s relationship to Richard C. Walker, the prolific patent creator from Agilent who has a patent for the Internet of Things, all the while Hillary holds the encryption keys to the internet.

Frankly, the citizens of America are beyond upset that three branches in Washington cannot clean up this mess.

We have posted volumes on indictable evidence showing the corruption of the swamp, from Rat Rodenstein’s wife Lisa Barsoomian to Dianne Feinstein’s (D-China) foreign interference in the elections, from Robert Mueller’s involvement with terrorizing Americans on September 11, 2001 to the nasty corruption of Mitt Romney who operates rigged voting machines along with his son Tagg, funded by  his globalist colleague George Soros.

American Intelligence Media patriots have placed the entire swamp on notice. And they had better pay attention because We the People are sick and tired of their

RIGGED ELECTION MACHINES

OUTRIGHT PATENT THEFT

GOVERNMENT FAILURE TO PAY FOR VENDORS (Leader Miller Act Notice has still not been paid.)

Hillary R. Clinton
Hillary R. Clinton

THAT NASTY WOMAN STILL WALKING AROUND WITH HER CORRUPT SYCOPHANTS, SHOWING US THAT WE ARE A NATION WITHOUT LAW AND ORDER

A THOROUGHLY CORRUPT COURT SYSTEM THAT UPHOLDS THE LAWLESSNESS OF THE GLOBALIST INFILTRATORS

To that end, our compatriot Christophe E. Strunk made an official filing with the Supreme Court on Friday. The petition calls out election rigging and the means by which it is done, the corruption of Senior Executive Service, SERCO, the Crown Agents, and the British and Chinese interference with our elections and government operations.

The Writ shows that the government hasn’t paid Leader Technologies for stealing its trade secrets, which have been the technologies that our enemy – the Globalists – have used to censor and surveil Americans. It provides links to hundreds of files from Americans for Innovation and their HUGE crimeline, with judicially recognizable evidence, of illegal and unconstitutional actions of the swamp creatures.

The filing was accepted by Justice Roberts’ office.

SCOTUS RULE 22-3 WRIT OF MANDAMUS USCAAF FOR PRESERVE PAPER BALLOTS 10-29-2018

.

TAKE ACTION

take actionLike Christopher Strunk, Michael McKibben, Tyla and Douglas Gabriel, you, too, can take action against a tyrannical government and its bad actors.

Examine the Writ of Mandamus yourself and see what you can do with your talents, skills, and time to push this important citizen-effort into your truth community.

Can you send a copy of the Writ to your Congressperson or Senator? Can you send a copy to VP Pence, who received his own copy from Strunk, but who might need to know you are watching him and that you demand that this globalist nonsense be defeated?

Do you think President Trump would be interested in seeing this filing? Then make it happen.

Are you a foreign person or country, an inventor, a business or person who has been wronged by these criminals?  We suggest that you check out the Crimeline on the AFI site and search the names of the companies and people that have harmed you. Check out the evidence we have and use it to take your own action.

Check out the dozens of citizen intelligence reports on the American Intelligence Media site. Read each one and educate yourself on the true nature of the enemy. Then educate and enlighten your circle of influence.

There are countless ways we can attack these bad actors. This is the Great Information War and we have given you a plethora of information tools to fight the battle in your part of the world.

Now get out there and start reclaiming the Republic.

The Ball (Writ of Mandamus) is in Robert’s Court

As we wait for Robert’s action on the People’s Writ of Mandamus, we are reminded what Judge Roberts said and/or affirmed to Congress between September 12–15, 2005 in his confirmation hearings.

“A judge should inform himself about his personal and fiduciary financial interests”
28 U.S.C. § 455(c) Disqualification of justice, judge

“A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety”
Code of Conduct for United States Judges, Canon 2

“ROBERTS: …If confirmed, I would resolve any conflict of interest by looking to the letter and spirit of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges . . . the Ethics Reform Act of 1989, 28 U.S.C. § 455, and any other relevant prescriptions.”
S. Hrg. 109-158, Roberts Nomination Hrgs., p. 118.[01]

“ROBERTS: …Well, I don’t think special interests should be allowed to lobby federal judges.”
S. Hrg., p. 431.

“KYLE: …Judge Roberts, I expect you to adhere to the Code of Judicial Ethics.”
S. Hrg., Statement of Hon. Jon Kyl, p. 20.

On threats to the rule of law, “ROBERTS: …The one threat I think to the rule of law is a tendency on behalf of some judges to take that legitimacy and that authority and extend it into areas where they’re going beyond the interpretation of the Constitution.”
S. Hrg., p. 256.

“ROBERTS: …[The Soviet Constitution] purported to grant wonderful rights of all sorts to people, but those rights were empty promises because that system did not have an independent judiciary to uphold the rule of law and enforce those rights. We do, because of the wisdom of our Founders and the sacrifices of our heroes over the generations to make their vision a reality.”
S. Hrg., p. 56; See also p. 447.

“ROBERTS: …I became a lawyer, to promote and vindicate the rule of law.”
S. Hrg., p. 447.

We are watching you, Justice Roberts. Time to get on the right side of truth.

Betsy the bulldog

Emergency Application to Preserve Paper Ballots Filed with U.S. Supreme Court, DHS, VPOTUS

Two Well-heeled NY Veterans Respond Powerfully to Executive Order 13848 to Disclose Proof of Election Interference

Exhibits Prove Foreign Interference from Britain, China and Shadow SES Government

Spread the truth.

Profile_SercoSpider1

On Oct. 29, 2018, two well-heeled U.S. USAF and Navy Veterans, Christopher Strunk and Harold Van Allen, filed an Emergency petition for a Writ of Mandamus and Injunctive Relief.

Their application was officially filed with Chief Justice John Roberts at the U.S. Supreme Court, John M. Mitnick at the Department of Homeland Security, and Vice President Mike Pence as head of the Presidential Election Investigation. Readers should note that both Justice Roberts and Mr. Mitnick are both Senior Executive Service (SES) members that is identified as one of the groups interfering in our elections.

The emergency petition asks: (1) to preserve paper ballots in all 50 states, (2) to convene a court of inquiry into foreign election meddling, (3) to report to DHS from the inquiry and (4) to order other appropriate relief.

Strunk and Van Allen provide over 300 pages of hard evidence, citing thousands of judicially-recognizable government documents, that the 2016 midterm election is threatened by numerous election meddling activities by:

Guarantees of a Free & Fair Vote:

Unbroken, Bipartisan Chain of Custody

One-Citizen, One-Vote

(1) The British Privy Council;

(2) George Soros’ Open Society Foundation in collaboration with former UN Deputy Secretary General Lord Mark Malloch-Brown;

(3) Massive fascist Big Tech election fraud and censorship of conservative voices in conspiracy with the Senior Executive Service (SES), U.S. Digital Service, Hillary Clinton, The Clinton Foundation, ENTRUST, Acxiom, Google, Alphabet, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, Alibaba, Baidu, Mail.ru, Lockheed, Big Finance, Big Audit, Big Law, USAID, OPIC, UN and others;

(4) Chinese “courtesy copies” of Hillary’s private server emails about classified U.S. State Department matters;

(5) British-controlled SERCO infiltration, with the British Crown Agents, in most US agencies, including the U.S. Patent Office;

(6) Social networking intellectual property theft (scalability) and brainwashing algorithms;

(7) Election machine tampering and fraud (ES&S, Smartmatic, Sequoia, Diebold, Hart Intercivic, Dominion, OpTech);

(8) Breaches of chains of custody on ballot counts, (8) man-in-the-middle ballot tally fraud;

(9) Congressional confirmation of these frauds (e.g., proposed Wyden Protecting Americans Votes and Elections Act of 2018).

Patriots are encouraged to contact these agencies and demand that all paper ballots be preserved by each state Secretary of State, until such time as a fair vote can be confirmed, and that their votes have been confirmed by bipartisan chain of custody citizens oversight (not bureaucrats and “expert” third parties), and one-citizen, one-vote.

Full SCOTUS filing. (Note: The actual petition is 30 pages. The other 339 pages are exhibits in support of the arguments. Suggest you scan quickly the first 11 pages that establish legal “standing,” then start reading in earnest about page 12.)

SCOTUS RULE 22-3 WRIT OF MANDAMUS USCAAF FOR PRESERVE PAPER BALLOTS 10-29-2018

Listen to Michael McKibben and Douglas Gabriel discuss the filing with petitioner Christopher Strunk. The People put the Supreme Court on notice

In the audio below we hear from in-the-swamp patriot Christopher Strunk after he delivers the petition to the Supreme Court. The document is now officially received by Justice Robert’s office.

AIM Cats go to SCOTUS on behalf of the PEOPLE

 

Links to Source Documents:
Executive Order 13848. (Sep. 12, 2018). Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election. 83 FR 48195, Doc. No. 2018-20816, Vol. 83, No. 179 published Sep. 14, 2018. Federal Register. See also https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/09/14/2018-20203/imposing-certain-sanctions-in-the-event-of-foreign-interference-in-a-united-states-election

Executive Order 13818. (Dec. 20, 2017). Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption. 82 FR 60839, Doc. No. 2017-27925, Vol. 82, No. 246 published Dec. 26, 2017. Federal Register. See also https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-12-26/pdf/2017-27925.pdf

Americans for Innovation
https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/p/emergency-application-to-preserve-paper.html

Analysis of DRAFT Executive Order for Social Media Bias

UNTRUSTWORTHINESS of those receiving the reporting (SES), other than the President.

The order names a number of players involved with evaluating the analysis (OMB, Treasury, etc.), including the President.

We show that all the agencies named, besides the President himself, are infested with the SES that must be countered.

Executive Order DRAFT. (Sep. 24, 2018). EXECUTIVE ORDER TO PROTECT COMPETITION AND SMALL BUSINESSES FROM BIAS IN ONLINE PLATFORMS. White House.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-09-24-Executive-Order-DRAFT-Protect-Against-Online-Bias-White-House-ca-Sep-24-2018.pdf

Executive order 1executive order 2

Clayton Act

Note that the PDF link at the top contains the active links to the references found on the flier.

.

Federal Bridge Certificate Authority is the Technical Platform for Senior Executive Service aka ‘Deep State’

The “Federal Bridge” public encryption key platform was set up in the early 1990’s under Bill Clinton to enable the spy agencies to tap into any cooperating computer system at any time. It was facilitated by the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) through the embedding of an “encryption backdoor key” (algorithm) called the Dual_EC_DRBG algorithm (Dual Elliptical Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generator).

It is a special mathematical formula for generating random numbers used for encryption – the NSA insisted on building in a flaw into this algorithm known only to them as a way to bypass all keys that were generated with this algorithm (ALL KEYS, EVERYWHERE). This NSA flaw in the encryption key is known to all insiders in the Deep State shadow government around the planet, we believe.

Here are properly formatted versions of the NIST Dual_EC_DRBG algorithm registry for required by the Department of Commerce on all hardware, software and firmware used outside the United States (EVERYTHING): HTML | PDF (Thank you to AFI researchers. It took eight hours to fix.)

figure 1 bridge

figure 2 bridge
Company Overview. (2003). Entrust – Securing Digital Identities & Information. The Federal Bridge: A Foundation of Trust. Entrust.
This infrastructure supports the Walker patents’ “Mass Data” surveillance grid.                     Human beings are described as “wet-ware” for The Internet of Things in the Walker patents. U.S. Patent No. 6,965,816.

Relevant Timeline entries showing that the Federal Bridge is the encryption key sharing architecture that enabled the Deep State shadow government (Senior Executive Services – SES) to hack/tap into any computer or phone, anywhere, anytime… and they have been able to do so since the early 1990’s. Robert S. Mueller, III has all information on all us “wet-ware” humans on the planet since the early 1990’s.

TIMELINE 

1993 Clinton’s FBI encryption backdoor key endorsed by the Carnegie Endowment for Peace, John Podesta, James P. Chandler, III

1994 FEDERAL BRIDGE – ENTRUST PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) monopoly (see below)

1994 Clinton secures high tech rare earth mines in Congo and Rwanda using genocide pretext

1994 Clinton Chronicles documentary released proving Clinton’s racketeering, drug smuggling, money laundering, Rose law firm

1995 Highlands Group created by DoD to coordinate illegal public-private spy partnerships off the record; decisions used as pretext

1997 FEDERAL BRIDGE – ENTRUST PMI Portal Access (Privileged Management Infrastructure) monopoly (see below)

1998 HP engineer Richard C. Walker starts filing a string of patent for “The Internet of Things”; lays out a global spy grid

1998 George Soros told CBS that he did not regret working with the Nazis against his fellow Jews in Hungary

1998-1999 Kosovo War used to clear out Christian Serbs from Kosovo to create unimpeded land route for planned coming Soros-funded Muslim migration; created genocide as pretext, like in Rwanda

1999 FEDERAL BRIDGE – ENTRUST PKI for Wireless monopoly (see below)

1999 Precursor to SERCO (SI International) formed by ex-Lockheed executives

1999 Clinton formed CIA In-Q-Tel as a public-private spy technology funding entity, abolished Glass-Steagall banking controls; formed National Infrastructure Assurance Council (NIAC) to run mass surveillance on all Americans from the White House

2000 NSA architect William Binney resigned; observed that NSA had “gone rogue”

2001 Clinton appointed James P. Chandler, III and Microsoft’s Bill Gates to National Infrastructure Assurance Council (NIAC) as he departs the White House

2001 In June, CIA whistleblower Susan Landauer warned of World Trade Center attack using airplanes; she was imprisoned without trial

2001 In July, operation “Stellar Wind” to spy on all Americans was approved by DOJ

2001 On Sep. 04, 2011, Robert S. Mueller, III was sworn in as Baby Bush FBI director

2001 9/11 used as pretext for Patriot Act takeover of American privacy and property Bill of Rights

2001 FEDERAL BRIDGE – ENTRUST Enhanced Internet Security PKI monopoly excuse following 9/11 (see below) 

Conclusion: The Federal Bridge, aka Federal Bridge Certificate Authority was the Deep State shadow government, aka Senior Executive Service (SES)’s actual technical platform for how computer systems across the Internet could allow the spy state to tap into any system in real time.

Company Overview. (2003). Entrust – Securing Digital Identities & Information. The Federal Bridge: A Foundation of Trust. Entrust.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2003-Company-Overview-Entrust-Securing-Digital-Identities-and-Information-The-Federal-Bridge-A-Foundation-of-Trust-Entrust-2003.pdf

entrust 1Entrust 2Entrust 3.JPG

Make sure to review our ongoing updates to this research:

Organization and Communication Structure of the Swamp Uncovered

 

 

It’s a Total Knock Out for Trump

It’s a Total Knock Out for Trump

.

Articles discussed in the audio above are:

Pentagon, State alumni join Brennan clearance outcry

.

SES logoDeep State – Shadow Government Revealed: Senior Executive Service

Obama Spied on Trump

Obama Spied on Candidate and President Donald J. Trump

The articles below were referenced in this audio.

The Assassination Attempts

.

 

SES Star Chamber Protects Assassination Attempt of the President

 

 

Just a little reminder of Clinton’s Pay-to-Play which is one of the things the Mueller Investigation is trying to hide

Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton’s State Department

.

Sally Moyer

Are Swamp Operatives Just Plain Stupid?

SES Star Chamber Protects Assassination Attempt of the President

The SES Star Chamber Explained. As you listen to the audio, you can read the relevant text of the IG Report below.

A Review of Various Actions by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice in Advance of the 2016 Election Oversight and Review Division 18-04 June 2018

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

CHAPTER SIXTEEN: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

First, we found that several FBI employees who played critical roles in the investigation sent political messagessome of which related directly to the Midyear investigation—that created the appearance of bias and thereby raised questions about the objectivity and thoroughness of the Midyear investigation.

Even more seriously, text messages between Strzok and Page pertaining to the Russia investigation, particularly a text message from Strzok on August 8 stating “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” in response to a Page text “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!,” are not only indicative of a biased state of mind but imply a willingness to take official action to impact a presidential candidate’s electoral prospects.

This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice. While we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed in Chapter Five, the conduct by these employees cast a cloud over the entire FBI investigation and sowed doubt about the FBI’s work on, and its handling of, the Midyear investigation.

It also called into question Strzok’s failure in October 2016 to follow up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop. The damage caused by these employees’ actions extends far beyond the scope of the Midyear investigation and goes to the heart of the FBI’s reputation for neutral factfinding and political independence.

Second, in key moments, then Director Comey chose to deviate from the FBI’s and the Department’s established procedures and norms and instead engaged in his own subjective, ad hoc decision making. In so doing, we found that Comey largely based his decisions on what he believed was in the FBI’s institutional interests and would enable him to continue to effectively lead the FBI as its Director.

While we did not find that these decisions were the result of political bias on Comey’s part, we nevertheless concluded that by departing so clearly and dramatically from FBI and Department norms, the decisions negatively impacted the perception of the FBI and the Department as fair administrators of justice. 498 Moreover, these decisions usurped the authority of the Attorney General and upset the well-established separation between investigative and prosecutorial functions and the accountability principles that guide law enforcement decisions in the United States.

As we further outline in this report, there was a troubling lack of any direct, substantive communication between Comey and then Attorney General Lynch in advance of both Comey’s July 5 press conference and his October 28 letter to Congress. With regard to the July 5 events, Comey affirmatively concealed his intentions from Lynch. When he did finally call her on the morning of July 5—after the FBI first notified the press—he told her that he was going to be speaking about the Midyear investigation but that he would not answer any of her questions, and would not tell her what he planned to say. During that call, Lynch did not instruct Comey to tell her what he intended to say at the press conference.

With respect to the October 28 letter, Comey chose not to contact Lynch or then Deputy Attorney General Yates directly; rather, he had FBI Chief of Staff Rybicki advise Yates’s senior advisor (then PADAG Axelrod) that Comey intended to send a letter to Congress and that Comey believed he had an obligation to do so. Given these circumstances, Lynch and Yates concluded it would be counterproductive to speak directly with Comey and that the most effective way to communicate their strong opposition to Comey about his decision was to relay their views to him through Axelrod and Rybicki.

We found it extraordinary that, in advance of two such consequential decisions, the FBI Director decided that the best course of conduct was to not speak directly and substantively with the Attorney General about how best to navigate these decisions and mitigate the resulting harms, and that Comey’s decision resulted in the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General concluding that it would be counterproductive to speak directly with the FBI Director.

This is not the first time the Department and the FBI have conducted a politically-charged investigation, and it will not be the last. To protect the institutions from allegations of abuse, political interference, and biased enforcement of the law, the Department and the FBI have developed policies and practices to guide their decisions. In the vast majority of cases, they are followed as a matter of routine. But they are most important to follow when the stakes are the highest, and when the pressures to divert from them—often based on well-founded concerns and highly fraught scenarios—are the greatest. No rule, policy, or practice is perfect, but at the same time, neither is any individual’s ability to make judgments under pressure or in what may seem like unique circumstances.

It is in these moments—when the rationale for keeping to the ordinary course fades from view and the temptation to make an exception is greatest—that the bedrock principles and time-tested practices of the Department and the FBI can serve their highest purpose.

Instant Messages between Agent 1 and Agent 5 Agent 1 is an experienced counterintelligence agent and was assigned to the Midyear investigative team from August 2015 through the conclusion of the investigation. Agent 1 was one of four agents responsible for the day-to-day activities of the Midyear investigation. Agent 1’s duties included conducting witness interviews and Agent 1 was one of the two agents who interviewed former Secretary Clinton on July 2. Agent 5 is also an experienced counterintelligence agent and was a member of the Midyear filter team. As a member of the filter team, Agent 5 was responsible for identifying privileged communications among the materials obtained by the FBI to ensure that they were not reviewed by the investigative team.

Neither Agent 1 nor Agent 5 was assigned to the FBI’s Russia investigation or the Special Counsel investigation. As noted previously, we identified instant messages sent by Agent 1, often to Agent 5, that expressed opinions critical of the conduct and quality of the Midyear investigation. We discussed these message in Chapter Five. In addition to those messages, we identified two instant message exchanges that appeared to combine a discussion of politics with a discussion of the Midyear investigation. We also identified instant messages between Agent 1 and Agent 5 that expressed support for Clinton and hostility toward Trump. We discuss these messages in this section, along with explanations provided by Agent 1 and Agent

Because it is relevant to their explanations, we note that Agent 1 and Agent 5, who are now married, were in a personal relationship that predated their assignment to the Midyear investigation. 1. Instant Messages Referencing the Midyear Investigation On July 6, 2016, the day after Comey’s Midyear declination announcement, Agent 1 and an FBI employee not involved with Midyear exchanged messages about the investigation. During the course of this discussion, Agent 1 described the prior weekend’s activities, which included the interview of Clinton. A portion of this 411 instant message exchange follows.

The sender of each message is noted after the timestamp.206 15:07:41, Agent 1: “…I’m done interviewing the President – then type the 302. 18 hour day….” 15:13:32, FBI Employee: “you interviewed the president?” 15:17:09, Agent 1: “you know – HRC” [Hillary Rodham Clinton] 15:17:18, Agent 1: “future pres” 15:17:22, Agent 1: “Trump cant win” 15:17:31, Agent 1: “demographics dont line up” 15:17:37, Agent 1: “America has changed”

We asked Agent 1 if he thought of Clinton as the next president while conducting the Midyear investigation. Agent 1 stated, “I think my impression going into the election in that personal realm is that all of the polls were favoring Hillary Clinton.” We asked Agent 1 if he treated Clinton differently because of this assumption. Agent 1 stated, “Absolutely not. I think the message they said that our leadership told us and our actions were to find whatever was there and whatever, whatever that means is what it means.” Comey sent the first letter to Congress about the Weiner laptop discovery on October 28, 2016.

Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged instant messages about the letter and Trump’s reaction to it later that day. The sender of each messages is noted after the timestamp. 13:46:48, Agent 5: “jesus christ… Trump: Glad FBI is fixing ‘horrible mistake’ on clinton emails… for fuck’s sake.” 13:47:27, Agent 5: “the fuck’s sake part was me, the rest was Trump.” 13:49:07, Agent 1: “Not sure if Trump or the fifth floor is worse…” 13:49:22, Agent 5: “I’m so sick of both…” 13:50:25, Agent 5: “+o( TRUMP”207 13:50:30, Agent 5: “+o( Fifth floor” 13:50:34, Agent 5: “+o( FBI” 13:50:44, Agent 5: “+o( Average American public” 206 All instant messages produced to the OIG reflected Greenwich Mean Time.

We have corrected times to the Eastern Time Zone as a result. In addition, some instant messages contained emojis, which we omitted unless they affected the meaning of the message. We also do not include other intervening instant messages unless they contribute to understanding the highlighted messages. 207 The symbol used in these messages is a “sick face” emoticon. See IM Emoticons, at http://sheet.shiar.nl/emoji (last accessed April 28, 2018). 412 We asked both Agent 1 and Agent 5 about these messages. Agent 1 and Agent 5 both stated the reference to “fifth floor” referred to the location of the FBI WFO’s Counterintelligence Division. Agent 1 continued: “Again, you know, I think a general, general theme in a lot of this is some personal comment, or, you know, complaining about common topics and leadership and, and venting.”

Agent 5 also described this as general complaining to Agent 1 and also as an example of her being “very tired of working” these types of cases. Agent 5 also noted that she was not involved in the review of the Weiner laptop.

Instant Messages Commenting on Trump or Clinton On August 29, 2016, Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged the following instant messages as part of a discussion about their jobs. The sender of each message is noted after the timestamp. 10:39:49, Agent 1: “I find anyone who enjoys [this job] an absolute fucking idiot.

If you dont think so, ask them one more question. Who are you voting for? I guarantee you it will be Donald Drumpf.” 10:40:13, Agent 5: “i forgot about drumpf…” 10:40:27, Agent 5: “that’s so sad and pathetic if they want to vote for him.” 10:40:43, Agent 5: “someone who can’t answer a question” 10:40:51, Agent 5: “someone who can’t be professional for even a second” On September 9, 2016, Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged the following instant messages. 08:56:43, Agent 5: “i’m trying to think of a ‘would i rather’ instead of spending time with those people” 08:56:54, Agent 1: “stick your tongue in a fan??” 08:56:58, Agent 5: “i would rather have brunch with trump” 08:57:03, Agent 1: “ha” 08:57:15, Agent 1: “french toast with drumpf” 08:57:19, Agent 5: “i would rather have brunch with trump and a bunch of his supporters like the ones from ohio that are retarded” 08:57:23, Agent 5: “:)” Agent 5 told the OIG these instant messages “referenced TV programming and commentary that Agent 1 and Agent 5 had recently viewed together.”

Agent 5 continued, “The reference was not a general statement about a particular part of the country, rather it was in jest and pertained to individuals’ inability to articulate any reason why they so strongly favored one candidate over another.” 413 On Election Day on November 8, 2016, Agent 1 and Agent 5 exchanged the following instant messages. 14:21:10, Agent 1: “You think HRC is gonna win right? You think we should get nails and some boards in case she doesnt” 14:21:56, Agent 5: “she better win… otherwise i’m gonna be walking around with both of my guns.” 14:22:05, Agent 5: “and likely quitting on the spot” 14:28:43, Agent 1: “You should know;…..” 14:28:45, Agent 1: “that” 14:28:50, Agent 1: “I’m…..” 14:28:56, Agent 1: “with her.” 14:28:58, Agent 1: “ooooooooooooooooooo” 14:29:02, Agent 1: “show me the money” 14:29:03, Agent 5: “

Who is Catherine Austin Fitts?

Catherine Austin Fitts is a frequent guest on alternative media sites like Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog or the Dark Journalist. If you don’t know her, she is the woman who reports the trillions of dollars missing at the Pentagon. Her claims started out as $21 trillion missing and now she claims it is $50 trillion.

What do we know about Fitts other than what she and Hunter tell us? We did our own digging into her background and found that it didn’t pass the “truth test”.

Fitts’ HUD title (the way she reports it in her online profile) first appeared in the 1992 Plum Book for the Daddy Bush presidency.

Fitts needs to explain why she is not listed in the 1992 Plum Book, and when exactly (dates) she was hired and fired from her HUD position. She also needs to disclose whether she now draws an SES pension or if she is being paid by SES or Serco in other capacities.

Catherine  Austin Fitts’ Wikipedia says of her federal employment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Austin_Fitts

catherine background

George H. W. Bush served as President between 1989-1993. Therefore, the SES people would be listed in the 1992 Plum Book.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/1992-11-10-S-Prt-102-509-Plum-Book-Policy-and-Supporting-Positions-Committee-on-Governmental-Affairs-102d-Congress-2d-Session-Y4G74-7-9-S-Prt-102-509-ISBN-0-16-039526-7-GPO-Nov-10-1992.pdf#page=84

However, while that position is listed as an SES job, Catherine Fitts is not listed in that position on p. 84, a Arthur J. Hill is:

p. 84

Housing SES

Arthur J. Hill’s Bloomberg bio says that he formed his investment company in 1993, just after Bush resigned and Clinton was installed. Which likely means he served as Commissioner until Bush left office.

https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=1169431&privcapId=104883551

Now the mystery, where is Catherine Austin Fitts’ disclosure in the position that Arthur J. Hill held?

Arthur J. Hill’s predecessor as listed in the 1988 Plum Book, p. 91 was THOMAS T. DEMERY:

Housing SES 2

Arthur J. Hill’s replacement as listed in the 1996 Plum Book, p. 160 was Nicholas P. Retsinas:

SES housing roster

Where in the world was Catherine Austin Fitts in the Plum Book? The position she claims to have held is definitely a top SES position.

.

Did Catherine Austin Fitts hold the position as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner? Or is she a fake, phony fraud?

If she held this position, why doesn’t her name show up in the Plum Books?

Greg HunterDo the YouTube channels that host her as a guest know that her background doesn’t check out with the Conclave researchers, or are they part of the propaganda network on YouTube?

Surely, if Greg Hunter knew this he would inform his audience that we are unable to verify Catherine’s HUD position claims. Unless he, too,…….(sigh)

We welcome official verification that Fitts is who she claims to be and we will be happy to correct the story and let our readers know.

(June 19, 2018)  Note to readers and follow up: We have received emails from folks with their opinions and anecdotal info about Catherine. We will not post these as they do not offer the information we are looking for. Let’s be specific:

  1. Fitts claims a specific title of former occupation to her Solari clients and viewers. This appears on her Wikipedia page, her website, and numerous self-testimonies on YouTube channels.
  2. This occupation is a Senior Executive Service position as shown by the Plum Books.
  3. Fitts is not mentioned in the official books to have ever held that title.

Is she who she claims to be? Not looking for opinions here. Just the hard core evidence and we don’t see any. And if she is a former SES operative, then we would like to bring to your attention many other questions we have about her narrative.

FULL DISCLOSURE: We fondly remember the interview we did with Fitts’ associate Harry Blazer in this blockbuster interview, available as a transcript.

Anatomy of the Deep State

Senior Executive Service Employees Get Red-Pilled!

Mulvaney and Trump just kicked Senior Executive Service out of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

We warned SES employees that they needed to get out…fast. We said: Take your early retirement and run out of the Swamp as fast as you can before Trump fires you and you have nothing. We know how you have been obstructing the United States government and you need to leave. 

 

SERCO beginning

……but on another front, American Patriots have a set back with this announcement below. Was it another no-bid contract awarded by Senior Executive Service operatives to the Crown-owned and operated Serco? When are we going to clear out these globalist operatives from our government?

Queen Elizabeth’s Serco secures US health insurance eligibility support contract valued at $900m USD

Serco has been awarded a contract to continue to support eligibility determinations for citizens purchasing health insurance through the Federal Health Insurance Exchanges. The contract has a one-year base period and four one-year option periods, with an estimated total value to Serco, subject to workload volumes, of approximately $900m if all option years are exercised.

Rupert Soames, Serco Group Chief Executive, said: “Serco has developed a strong working partnership with CMS to provide it with vital consumer eligibility services.”

Name sound familiar? Who is Rupert Soames?

Soames and Gardner

.

Lizzard queenWhy is this important to average, everyday Americans?

Because SES bottomfeeders continue to award Serco no-bid, lucrative contracts to operate the U.S. government.

Serco is controlled by the Queen of England and her merry men, like Rupert Soames and Geoffrey Pattie, in the Privy Council.

Bottom line: SES operatives run America on behalf of Queen Lizzie.

SES Fleeces America with No-Bid Contracts to Serco