The controlled local liberal media (print and air waves) continue to protect U.S. Senator Angus King (I) from himself but cracks have been seen. King’s positive ratings recently dropped to 46%. Eric Brakey (R) was up to 29%; the socialist was at 8%; an additional 17% undecided. (Many of them are Trump supporters who do not know Brakey yet).
Eric Brakey is hoping President Trump might come to Maine before election day.
This particular swamp committee knows the alleged Russian collusion with Trump was set up by Hillary, Obama and top political agents of our respective intelligence agencies.
Now King negotiated his way onto the U.S. Intelligence Committee six years ago giving Maine and California the only two states with multiple globalist senators on the committee.
There is no doubt in my mind this second generation Washington D.C. lawyer is up to his eyeballs in swamp muck. He attempts not to speak publicly on the record on critical issues. He restricts himself to speaking privately to individual groups on difference sides of any hot issue. Behind close doors he will tell each side what they want to hear. Ultimately he always votes democratic (unless it is a Republican spending bill). He always votes yes on “all” spending bills from either party.
A good example of local media bias is related to a 9/11 event both King and Brakey attended two days ago. Maine State Senator Eric Brakey, who is running for U.S. Senate in Maine, was shocked when, part way through King’s five minute speech, he equated 9/11 to Trump’s collusion with Russia. Fortunately King’s comments were filmed. Brakey’s campaign released the the segment where King equated 9/11 to Trump’s collusion.
Brakey condemned the comparison and released a statement to the state media and Facebook:
Most of the local media refused to touch the attack on Trump by a U.S. Intelligence Committee member.
The local paper that concluded they must print something, since it happened under their noses, went to Angus King and asked him about the comment and how they might diffuse this gaff. The writer of the story decided to apply one of King’s responses as the headline of the article he wrote.
It was titled: Brakey campaign releases spliced remarks from King. (Translation…don’t believe the story I am forced to tell you about the 74 year-old globalist). See article below.
Eric Brakey knows he is not only battling Angus King, he is battling the swamp, too, with all its minions in the media. Eric keeps knocking on doors and replies to any event which brings large groups of Mainers together.
Mainers can begin voting after Labor Day. King is refusing to debate until October.
King’s comments did make national news on Fox’s “Tucker”. He commented on King’s dumb remarks:
Can you provide me with the source material for the 2006 or 2007 DOJ sale of voting machines company to Bain Capital and Mitt Romney as stated in your flow chart?
We have not yet found the source or terms of sale. This is a key point we want to highlight.
We have been posting about election fraud and the rigged machines used to spoil our votes and corrupt our elections. In the articles below you will learn how electronic machines – any and all – lose the bi-partisan chain of custody of the vote by converting them into electronic digits and throwing them into the nebulous digital cloud.
You may think that your polling place is safe because you cast your vote on a paper ballot, but once it slips into a Hart InterCivic or other machines like it, your vote is lost in the digital realm. You don’t know where it is and how it is being counted.
Our Conclave team filed a Writ of Mandamus in Washington state and put the Secretary of the State on notice that voters are paying attention to voting machine fraud. We are now making this document available to our readers in PDF and WORD format so that you can use it as a template to file your own writ with your state’s election official. You will need to change items that are state-specific to your filing.
If you feel uncomfortable in filing it yourself, get some paralegal help or ask a patriot who has a legal background to help you file it. We want as many of these filed as possible.
Any citizen can file these. PLEASE get this done before November mid-terms. We need to put globalists like Mitt Romney, George Soros, and Mark Malloch-Brown on notice that citizens are wide awake and aren’t falling for their electronic voting schemes anymore.
Don’t forget where our collective target is this month. It is election rigging awareness month. We have lots of posts and audios on our sites for you to circulate among your circle of influence. You can also do your own research and send us your original work so we can share with our global truth community.
The map shows what the 2016 US Presidential Election results would have been if votes not cast for Hillary, Trump or one of the third-party candidates or if had gone to fictional candidate named,“Did Not Vote.”
Disclaimer: The map above was accurate as of January 17th, 2017. Totals below were true at the time of writing but may no longer currently be accurate as additional votes and recounts are conducted.
Only 8 states + Washington DC, had high enough voter turnouts where one of the actual candidates won more votes than people who did not bother to vote. Iowa and Wisconsin for Trump and Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire and DC for Clinton.
(Undated) A few other 2016 election facts for you:
As a percentage of eligible voters, Clinton received 26.82% (65,845,063) of all votes compared to Trump’s 25.65% (62,980,160) and Did Not Vote’s 43.79% (107,000,000).
Total voter turnout was estimated to be 55.7% of the voting age registered population.
It is the 5th election since 1820 when the winner of the popular vote lost the presidency (the others being 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000)
Donald Trump received 2,046,656 more votes than Romney did in 2012, but Hilary Clinton received 70,732 fewer votes than Obama did in 2012.
Neither Candidate even won a majority of votes cast, Clinton got 48.0% vs Trump’s 45.9% of those who did vote.
Washington DC is the only area in the country where a majority of all eligible voters (whether they voted or not) voted for Clinton (90% of voters, voted for Clinton on a 55.7% turnout). In the other 6 states listed above, victories were simple pluralities.
The numbers below are shocking! People have lost faith in the election system and these two corporate owned parties. For various reasons 107 million potential voters in the 2016 Presidential election in U.S. did not vote.
How many millions of those electors came to the same conclusion as Christine Mose did? Christine wrote: “Voting has become an act of endorsing your own systematic oppression and perpetuates the illusion that we live in a functioning democracy.” What I call the Mark Twain party below, Twain said some 100 years ago: “If voting made any difference they wouldn’t let us do it.”
When people come to that conclusion, many just stop voting. Voter turnout will only increase when people see proof that election results ARE REAL! Publicly verified elections, as we are proposing, utilizing digital ballot images with risk-limiting audits will result in elections that people can believe in.
We must make Elections Transparent, Track-able and Publicly Verified if we are to protect our democracy. Governments must not be the sole verifier of its own secret electronic elections.
The importance of ballot images is being increasingly recognized, as evidenced by the new Congressional effort to secure voting systems sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden. Quote from THE HILL article: “State and local officials would also be required to implement what are known as “risk-limiting audits” — a method that verifies election outcomes by comparing a random sample of paper ballots with their corresponding digital versions — for all federal elections.”
Article from THE HILL, BY MORGAN CHALFANT – 06/12/18: “Dems unveil push to secure state voting systems.” “The bill introduced Tuesday (Wyden Bill) is specifically designed to ensure the integrity of and bolster confidence in the federal vote count”:
Nationally, according to PEW report the 55.7% turnout in last year’s election puts the U.S. behind most of its peers in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, most of whose members are highly developed, democratic states. The most recent nationwide election in each of the 35 OECD member nations, placed USA the U.S. 28th, right behind Estonia.
They don’t ask for compliance until November 2020. This way the election machine rigging machines that are owned by Mitt Romney, George Soros, Lord Mark Malloch-Brown and other globalists can continue to rig elections.
WE THE PEOPLE demand paper ballots NOW. This is of vital importance to our election integrity and the democracy of our nation. These Senators are trying to “head fake” us into their limited bill so that they can rig 2018 and all the primaries between now and 2020 – whereupon they will change this bill before 2020 and keep the corrupt machines in place.
Don’t buy this false narrative. MAGA Senators need to offer alternative language that requires paper ballots and bi-partisan PUBLIC chain of custody – EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.
When we see Rand Paul, Devin Nunes, and Jim Jordan support this bill, we will know we have a solid bill in place… until then, this bill stinks.
Meanwhile, we are still waiting for another Romney to start doing her job instead of keeping the old guard in place. What has Ronna ROMNEY McDaniel done – publicly and veraciously – to put 50 states on notice that the GOP will not tolerate election machine rigging?
The importance of ballot images is being increasingly recognized, as evidenced by the new Congressional effort to secure voting systems sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden. Quote from the Wyden bill: “State and local officials would also be required to implement what are known as “risk-limiting audits” — a method that verifies election outcomes by comparing a random sample of paper ballots with their corresponding digital versions — for all federal elections.”
How bad is it? Michigan, for example, has gone 100% digital when it comes to voting machines. Its primary is August 7. Digital ballot images are public records in most states; however, in compromised states, they’re destroying them.
And what has RNC Chair Ronna ROMNEY McDaniel who lives in Northville, Michigan done about it? (See article below that describe Uncle Mitt’s election corruption)
N O T H I N G
Uncle Mitt, of course, is part of this election rigging system.
This is Election Rigging Awareness Month and we will need lots of great content from independent creators to keep traction going on this important message and call to action.
Our “awareness months” have become huge successes – so big THANK YOU to all who have been participating. By giving attention to one theme a month. we have been able to get critical traction needed to bring attention to important intelligence findings that can help POTUS clean the swamp.
Send us your final products – articles, videos, memes, etc. so we can share with the the A4T community, who, in turn, educates and enlightens their own audience. Remember that in the internet TRUTH is radiant, non-linear…just like LIGHT.
In this post we welcome, John and Arlene, new members of the American Intelligence Media Conclave. They have been doing serious work on election rigging since 2004 and join our efforts in guiding citizens in DEMANDING FAIR AND TRANSPARENT ELECTIONS.
Below are some notes and highlights they have sent us that independent media creators and concerned citizens may be able to use in their campaigns for fair and transparent elections. Calling on all jewelers and smithies to produce final products so we can scale this important information world-wide from now through the November elections.
Want to know more about how you can become a jeweler or smithie? Click here.
Our focus has been on phase 1 of our long-term plan: securing the preservation of digital ballot images in as many election jurisdictions as possible. After in-depth research into the laws, regulations, and election administration in each state, we approach key election officials directly. We begin with education, as we are finding that most election administrators who oversee the use of digital ballot scanners are unaware of the existence or importance of the ballot images! In some cases, educating these public servants is enough for them to follow federal & state laws that require ballot image preservation.
Elsewhere, additional pressure including legal action is necessary. Here is a state-by-state snapshot of our work to date:
Virginia: Before the November 7, 2017 state election, we were assured by election officials that the ballot images were preserved. Instead, they were destroyed. This was the election where the balance of power in the House of Delegates was determined by one disputed ballot on which the marking had been changed either during or after the election. Ballot images could have determined the legitimacy of that ballot. Yet Virginia still failed to order ballot image preservation in the state’s subsequent June 12 primary. Attorney Chris Sautter and John Brakey are to meet with JAMES B. ALCORN, ESQ State Chair of VA Election Board on July 24th.
Ohio: When we learned that the three largest counties using digital scanners, with the largest populations of people of color, planned to destroy the ballot images created by their election systems in the May 8 primary. AUDIT USA asked the Secretary of State to direct these counties to preserve the ballot images. He was not forthcoming with us, so we filed a mandamus with the Supreme Court of Ohio. The case was dismissed on a (questionable) technicality, yet we learned that the Secretary of State had given a directive to all counties to save the ballot images, making Ohio a win for the retention of ballot images.
Maine: Primary was June 12. This state is 100% digital ballot image technology. Ballot images were saved statewide for the first in the nation Rank Choice Voting of all state and federal races. For the towns and municipalities races a second ballot and machine were used. They were not given the directive to save those images. We are considering a public records request to shine the light of clarification and prove availability.
Maryland: Primary was June 26. This state has 100% ballot images which were released to the candidates of a contest race in Montgomery county. However, the issues here are of a different nature. There are two aspects to conducting an election. One is the machinery and vendors that do the counting. The other is the company that manages the voter database and sends out the absentee ballots. Usually the State receives the election night results, however in Maryland it is this company the receives them. This structure raises concerns in general as this vendor has too much power. They could suppress people from voting, and stuff the ballot boxes. It has recently come to media attention that in 2015 the company that controls this aspect of the voting process was acquired by a Russian Oligarch.
Florida: Primary is August 28. This state 75% ballot images. There are already dark clouds over this state for the handling of the primary election of 2016 between Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Tim Canova where the Broward County Election Director destroyed the original ballots and has yet to be prosecuted and held accountable, see video. Video 2. There are multiple reasons for this investigation and action. Florida could go backwards. Back to DREs and away from hand marked paper ballot to machine marked paper ballots that could be easily gamed, plus cost 3 times more. We call these machines the $4,000 pencils, plus it uses a QR code to count, not the marks made by electors when their ballots go into the digital scanner!
Rhode Island: Primary is Sept. 12. This state is 100% ballot images. The digital scanners have built in cellular modems, connecting their system to the internet. These machines were approved and certified by the Feds. We are evaluating our options. We cannot use a writ of mandamus because their system has federal approval. See NYT article, The Myth of the Hacker-Proof Voting Machine
Massachusetts: Primary Sept. 18. This state is 11% ballot images at this time. We have learned that the Secretary of State instructed counties to destroy the ballot images. We and local EI activists will push to try to have this changed before the primary.
We are currently researching Michigan (primary Aug 7th) and New Mexico, both now are 100% digital ballot images. As well as continuing our work in many of the states above. It’s been reported that 15 more counties in California are converting to new digital scanners before the November election.
Media interviews, social media postings, and our website continue to be essential to our educational media strategy. Our representatives are also speaking at conferences and meeting with community groups and election officials. The importance of ballot images is being increasingly recognized, as evidenced by the new Congressional effort to secure voting systems sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden.
Quote from the Wyden bill: “State and local officials would also be required to implement what are known as “risk-limiting audits” — a method that verifies election outcomes by comparing a random sample of paper ballots with their corresponding digital versions — for all federal elections.”
James, another Conclave member, has been working on a Writ of Mandamus package for all to use.
James writes: “I am working on a Writ of Mandamus to compel the State of Washington to ‘count ballots’ under bi-partisan chain of custody. We use ‘direct scanning’ by Hart InterCivic that uses OpTech OCR technology. No human count is made. No statistical sampling counts are made. The entire voting process depends on a self-validation report, which is ‘fraud’. Yet, no one has petitioned the state in two election cycles to do otherwise. I guess that is why we are now “DEEP BLUE”.”
He indicates that these are great links for election procedures:
Election machines have become commonplace in every precinct in the United States. Most people believe that the efficiency of using machines outweigh the risks, saving public money and providing quick results for the people to know the winners and losers.
These are the reasons touted by election officials. However, nothing could be farther from the truth. Only humans can empirically observe bi-partisan chain of custody. Machines cannot do this, in any form, without creating ‘incurable uncertainty’. No certificate of assurance from any entity, test, encryption, or machine language can prevent this loss of observation.
A human citizen voter cannot observe an integrated circuit on a silicon chip, or observe the programming embedded on the silicon chip, and therefore cannot attest to its ‘chain of custody’ or ‘validity.’ A statistical sampling of the voting summation also cannot cure the uncertainty created by the loss of empirical observation.
The logic is simple…what the human eye cannot see and verify is a ‘fraud’.
Evolving voting methods have produced systems with significant holes in chain of custody which can call election legitimacy into question. Three voting methods which produce breaches in chain of custody are: vote-by-mail; electronic voting; and Internet voting.
These methods make it difficult for the public to verify that: (a) all ballots cast were counted; (b) ballots counted were not altered; and (c) unauthorized votes were not added. There are two main types of machines in use today: DRE or ‘direct scanning’ the other is ‘Direct Voting’ without a paper ballot. Each system is flawed in that no human tally outside the machine can be observed and therefore bi-partisan chain of custody is lost.
The integrity of the voting process, and the ‘will of the people’ is simply to precious in a Constitutional Republic to be subject to unscrupulous meddling by any means, and by anyone.
All elections are critical. However, this 2018 midterm is important. The recent turmoil about hacking and interfering in America’s elections has never been greater. Election machines have become very sophisticated and pose a threat to the voting process by introducing ‘incurable uncertainty’ for the people that their ‘will’ is not being properly counted and expressed in the election outcomes.
There is a simple way to provide remedy to ‘incurable uncertainty’, and that is to move ‘back to the Future’, eliminate all electronic machines, use paper ballots, and count them under bi-partisan chain of custody, using video surveillance at all times to protect the balloting process.
This cannot be done without serious support and organization within each state.
However, there is a powerful tool available to each citizen or group of citizens, that by law, cannot be ignored. It is a ‘Writ of Mandamus’ that is filed in a local Superior county court in your State. When properly written and presented, a judge must rule or provide cause in writing to ‘not rule’.
I have written a sample ‘Writ of Mandamus’ for Washington State. It can be modified quickly and filed for a modest fee in your court system. It is easy to modify with a little formatting changes as needed. If many people begin to file these ‘Writs’ we can effect change and send a message to our local, county, state, and Federal government, that the ‘will of the people’ is not subject to the vagaries of hacking through technology.
There is no hurry to count the ballots so that news agencies can report the winners/losers. Integrity and accuracy are not for sale, and bi-partisan chain of custody is more important than expediency.
Jim has prepared a Writ of Mandamus for the State of Washington. You can use this Word document template to create your own notice for your state. We have highlighted in red the items that you will need to make unique in your filing. You will also need to change the wording withing the document to specifically reference your state (currently it is listed as Washington State)
Do we know if the DOJ has actually issued a ‘warning’ to the American people to guard against ‘election hacking’ with guidance? If so, this is huge evidence, if it has been issued to ‘We the People’. We know the real story, but it seems that they are now caught in their own ‘snare’, like ‘tar-baby’ in the Brier patch. We the people, must now demand ‘human countable’ paper ballots, as guidance from the DOJ. How sweet if true.
John and Arlene have a few notes on Writ of Mandamus to add to James’ comments above.
…a writ of mandamus, special action, for us is… “your honor, we proven the fact in the case and these election official are mandated by law to preserve these critical records!”
Please order them to follow the law.
Attached document (10R) starting on page 26 has 3 court case, AZ, AL and Ohio, that were writs of mandamus.
I don’t know what is the state policy in MI is yet. In AL and Ohio they tried to say that they didn’t turn on that feature that make the ballot image. That a lie when say that. It doesn’t work unless it make an image.
Standing by, Michigan Primary is Aug 7th. We had to sue SoS of Ohio Jon Husted and at the minimum we want NO less than this. See attache doc 03L Data Retention.