Category: History

Truth History is Shocking

Truth History is Shocking – Michael & the Gabriels

.

fake news 1909.JPGfake news pdffake news pdf 2.JPG

Open this link and read TRUTH HISTORY that the evil British Monarch and Pilgrims Society have kept hidden from our history books. The amazing researchers at Americans for Innovation put this 6 page information sheet in a PDF form with rich hyperlinks so that you can educate your network and family about who is really ruling the planet and how they use propaganda (fake news and fake history) to keep humanity controlled. Here is a tiny url link for easy sharing: https://tinyurl.com/yyp8ve6w

This is pertinent information for every patriot, no matter where you live in the world. The Pilgrims Society and British Monarch are enemies of planet Earth and all humanity.

SAVE THIS PDF IN YOUR PERMANENT RECORDS.

.

Patriots Must Destroy the Pilgrims Society and SES for Liberty’s Sake

Condor is a guest author and member of the American Intelligence Media conclave of high-level thinkers and researchers. Below is a note that he sent to us to share with the AIM truth community.


Dear Douglas,

I enjoyed listening to your most recent interview titled: Another Insider comes forward XX.  [Note to readers: All headline links and videos are embedded at the bottom of the page.]

Due to this interview, I visited my computer archives to pull up some related facts…just in case you were going to continue mining information on this topic.

Below is an FYI of some additional nuggets you might find intriguing by other insider whistleblowers against SES and their puppet masters, the Pilgrim Society.

Introduction

A year ago AIM discussed the story behind the Donald Trump and America first, associated with the Clintons’ involvement in taking out a military plane which was attempting to escape back to Texas from Washington D.C.  (See AIM link: The Story Behind Donald Trump and America First. See Headlines with a Voice link: The Story Behind Trump’s Slogan)

President Clinton and his puppet master, the Pilgrim Society, sabotaged and destroyed the plane with all aboard because these military officers had evidence proving President Clinton had sold military secrets to the Chinese. This was to position China as the new hegemon of the globe in the 21st century. The military brass on the plane intended to begin filing treason charges against President Clinton as soon as they reached safely back into Texas. It was not to be.

As you may recall, the military plane exploded in mid-air killing everyone on board.  Two days later, the Oklahoma bombing took place. Most of the American public was distracted by the Oklahoma bombing. The corporate controlled Main Stream Media was ordered to kill any further news concerning the unusual military plane crash.

Here are more parts of the Clinton/Bush story tied to the plane crash and the Oklahoma bombing…and how it is connected to your most recent interview.

1st Nugget:

For reasons cited below, President Clinton and the Deep State (aka, Senior Executive Service-SES) had been planning to take out the Oklahoma Federal Building since at least 1994. There were several large sets of documents in the Oklahoma Federal Building which had to be destroyed. Due to the fact the Pilgrim Society had just taken out (murdered) the military plane of patriots, it likely had to move up the scheduled terror attack on the Oklahoma Federal building. This rush job resulted in some dumb mistakes which led to additional individuals patriots having to be murdered to cover up their diabolical actions.

In your XX interview, (@23:19 mark) the gentleman indicated retired FBI agent, Ted Gunderson, was likely murdered with arsenic poisoning. The link below involves former Los Angeles FBI head, Ted Gunderson.

FBI LA district head, Ted Gunderson retired in 1979 and began investigating cases FBI refused to take on. In the video that was once posted at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSc8gk5_k_0,  but now removed, Ted Gunderson details the military/CIA involvement in the Oklahoma bombing and that several bombs were diffused in the building itself.

In the hour long video, he discussed why the alleged fertilizer bomb was “bull crap”.  It was a directional bomb in the truck. Several bombs had been planted inside the building. One did detonate while two others did not and were diffused. He discusses Sgt. Terrance Yeakey, a Oklahoma City Police Officer. He was nearby and jumped to action as a first responder to the OKC bombing. Known to friends as Terry, this patriot saved the lives of eight people from the Alfred P. Murrah building on the morning of April 19, 1995. He saw things that morning which contradicted the reports the corporate main stream media were ordered to release later that day.  The local police officer refused to go along with federal statements and began his own investigation. He was ultimately tortured and murdered and the Feds called it a suicide.

FBI still will not release the videos from surrounding buildings that day nor transcripts from eye witness reports.

Attachment 1:

THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING STORY YOU WERE NEVER TOLD ABOUT

This is an article about the possible FBI murder of Sgt. Terrance Yeakey, an eyewitness and 1st responded to the bombing.

Attachment 2:

Oklahoma City Bombing – What happened to the diffused bombs reported all morning

This includes an original articles about multiple bombs being found and diffused. The article also includes link: https://youtu.be/X9ifndJ2lQY where air media reports capture and diffusion of at least two additional bombs, inside the building.

2nd Nugget.

A CIA agent comes out of Cold to explain why the hit was ordered on Oklahoma building in behalf of the Clintons and Bushes.

Subject: Did Black Ops Agent step out of shadows to expose domestic terrorism by recent U.S. Presidents? He dared not to become a whistleblower until Donald Trump became President and both the Bushes and Clintons were out-of-power.

Below are some of my notes from listening to a summary of a couple of articles concerning additional reasons President Clinton and the Deep State needed to take out the Oklahoma federal building.

choosing the light snodgrass.JPGThe interview was from January 24, 2018. It was on the X22 Report – Spotlight with former CIA agent, Cody Snodgres. His book is illustrated to the right.

Cody was born around 1955 and went to college in the late 1970s. He excelled in physics and math. He went on to get a master’s degree in science. The Pilgrim Society’s was drawn to him just as they were to Edwin Pauley, back in 1923.

As noted in a number of AIM articles, with the Pilgrim Society in secret control of the U.S. energy industry monopoly, they decided to transition oversight of U.S. energy policy execution from Edwin Pauley (mid 1930s to late 1970s) to Henry Kissinger. (See AIM article: The Real Energy Revolution Has Begun)

As was discussed in your interview, Another Insider comes forward XX, Edwin Pauley trained President Bush Senior in the fine art of  being a CIA spy and criminal (seen at the 38-42 minute mark of your interview).

The Pilgrim Society ordered Edwin Pauley and his minions to secure the resignations of President Nixon, Congressmen Chester Holifield, Craig Hosmer and many other key government officials in 1974 to hide the successful sabotage, suppression and cover-up of GALT (Geothermal Atmospheric Liquified Thorium) energy technology. See AIM link: Thorium Energy Technology Can Free the World from Nuclear Poisons Today

The Pilgrim Society could take this action because they had already put plans in place to secretly launch Senior Executive Services (SES) to replace these retiring American traitors. SES was established under the Carter Administration in 1978. Everything was being prepared for George Walker Bush to become the next President, with his Deep State, SES team, already set in place.

Unfortunately for the Pilgrim Society, Reagan won the Republican nomination in 1980 as oppose to Bush! In attachments below, we can conclude that the hidden government is perfectly capable of having another President if the incumbent does not follow the laid out path.

Attachment 3:

Was FDR a Victim of Assassination

Attachment 4:

DID FDR COMMIT SUICIDE OR WAS HE ASSASSINATED?

Sixty-nine days after winning the Presidency, Vice President Bush, who earlier aided in the assassination of President Kennedy, almost took out his immediate boss, President Ronald Reagan. Why was Bush given permission to plot Reagan’s assassination? It was once he entered the Presidency, he chose not follow the laid out path dictated by the Pilgrim Society.

Sidebar:

To date eight Presidents have died in office. Modern day history books suggest four Presidents died of natural causes (Harrison, Taylor, Harding and FDR) while four others were assassinated (Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley and Kennedy). I have uncovered numerous documents strongly suggesting President Harrison, and all but one of his eight children, over a one-year period, died of poison…as a warning for any future President who resisted the will of the globalists…that you must not stray from the path laid out for you. The modern day Pilgrim Society will not only murder you…it will eliminate your bloodline!

Zachary Taylor strayed. Documents I have from the 1800’s strongly suggest he too was poisoned.  Many other Presidents were fortunate enough to survive assassination attempts by both poison and bullets!

While it was reported Franklin D. Roosevelt died of a cerebral hemorrhage, no one was allowed to see the body. As will be discovered in the 4th attachment, the son of FDR’s undertaker, at age 78, finally disclosed a bullet to the head caused the cerebral hemorrhage. Thanks to FOIA, more suppressed testimony witnesses of that time, is lending more credibility to the theory of FDR dying, either at his own hand, or at the hand of another. 

The earlier, 3rd attachment, points out the Pilgrim Society might have been cleaning house as the outcome of World War II was now known.  Ubaney writes, “Are we really expected to believe that (FDR) died of natural causes at the same time the Allied troops were closing in on Hitler’s bunker? Are we really expected to believe that Roosevelt, Hitler, and Mussolini died within 18 days by coincidence?”

While Reagan survived the assassination attempt, some believe, the Vice President actually ran the United States for the ensuing 12 years before the Clintons took over…but I digress.

It was right around this time period (late 70s-early 80s), Cody graduated college. He initially declined CIA recruitment and went into the oil industry not knowing the close ties between Edwin Pauley’s Chevron and the CIA. (See Yellow Brick Road, from Harvard to Enron, Part III, 2002, by financial reporter Linda: What was so special about 1974?)

In the interview below we learn how Cody eventually became a Black Ops operator for the CIA and a gun runner.

Sidebar:

In your  XX interview, (@26:00 mark) TWA pilot Barry Seal, was discussed in detail. Cody worked with that TWA pilot.

Cody Snodgres was one of the real life participates in the guns and drug running antics going on during the Regan/Bush/Clinton years involving the Medellin Cartel and Contras.  Unlike TWA pilot, Barry Seals, Nichols and Cody are about the only survivors still alive to tell the actual story involving both the Bushes and Clintons.

In this interview, Cody explains why he had to wait over twenty-two years to publish his book. It was critical to him that both the Bushes and the Clintons be out of power.  Otherwise there was too much corruption in all three branches of government, thanks to the secret Pilgrim Society, to ever let his book, and supporting evidence, get out to the American public. Cody believes President Trump and those who support him, are trying to drain the Swamp. Cody knows he is risking his life by stepping out of the shadows but this is the time for all patriots to step forward and take a stand and be counted.

murrah building.JPG

In this interview, Cody explains how, in 1994, he was offered a million dollars, by the CIA, to blow up the Murrah Building in Oklahoma. The 1995 bombing death toll stood at 168 people, including 19 young children who were in the building’s day care center at the time of the blast. More than 650 other people were injured in the bombing, which damaged or destroyed over 300 buildings in the immediate area. He explains the two key reasons both the Bushes and Clintons, despite all the carnage, needed to have this specific Federal building taken out (found at the 23:30 mark of interview). When Cody turned the black-opts deal down, the CIA recruited Timothy McVeigh six months later.

Cody also explains, in this interview, the criminal activities behind the Waco’s Branch Davidian massacre (33:48) resulting in fifty-four dead including 21 children. Cody details how over several nights, helicopters rained down bullet fire into the building eventually killing everyone inside. Not wanting the American public to know the SES murdered all these children, they set fire to the site and claimed they were not at fault for the children’s death.

Cody details how the Pilgrim Society’s ally in crime, the main stream media (MSM) could have blown this 1993, WACO false flag story wide open as well as the Oklahoma federal building bombing, but their job is not to keep the American public informed! Rather, the role of the corporate controlled MSM (again a close partner of the secret Pilgrim Society) is to erase any trace of the evil elites controlling major portions of our country (48:00).  They only tell the American public want the Pilgrim Society wanted it to know.

Remember, these two false flags alone, murdered forty (40) children. Cody was able to gather up all the documentation the MSM and the FBI refused to take possession of due to orders from above.

Cody wraps up the interview by sharing with the listener what really happened in Benghazi, Libya at the 54:00 mark. Qaddafi made the mistake of allowing the Pilgrim Society to learn of all the gold he had accumulated along with major Russian arms. It is alleged the Pilgrim Society stole the gold and transferred the weapons to ISIS through their Benghazi embassy. Cody states the embassy was attacked because Libyans where trying to stop the ongoing gun transfer to ISIS inside their country.

ISIS was attacking Libyans with those weapons to maintain the Central Banks petrodollar structure which has been keeping the Pilgrim Society in power since the early 1970s when gold-backed currency failed. Once the petrodollar was established, for the sake of Pilgrim Society’s national security, the GALT chemical reactors had to be sabotaged and suppressed. Otherwise the petroleum age would have ended and the petrodollar would be meaningless.

Summary:

President Trump, like President Kennedy, McKinley and Lincoln, is well aware of the life and death struggle before him presently. When he decided to not only run and win the Presidency, but to not follow the laid out path by the Pilgrim Society, he was facing an execution sentence.

Like the prior signers of the Declaration of Independence, for the loving belief of America as the shining light on a hill, President Trump knew what destiny lay before him. He was not only pledging his life and fortune, based on past atrocities dealt out to the true patriot signers of the Declaration of Independence, he was also risking the lives of his immediate family and descendants. The central bankers, who controlled the British Empire during the ensuing War of 1812, used this opportunity to purposely seek out and exterminate those patriots, their wives and offspring as a message to future generations that dared to seek independence from the ruling class.

Today, we are one step closer to an Impeachment battle as the Pilgrim Society’s minions are ordered to nullify the 2016 Presidential election. Like Battle of the Alamo…a line had been drawn. Patriots must either take out the Pilgrim Society or witness the flame of liberty snuffed out first in America. Today, as more American patriots recognize the scope of this epic battle today, I am thankful, websites, like the American Intelligence Media, are getting more facts out to both the American public and the world at large! Keep up the heroic work!

God bless President Trump! I hope all patriots will pray for his success and for the safety of his remarkable family?


Below are the headline links and videos used in Condor’s post. If anyone has a copy of the video where Ted Gunderson details the military/CIA involvement in the Oklahoma bombing, please send it to us and we will make a copy and embed below.

Another Insider comes forward XX

.

The Story Behind Donald Trump and America First

.

The Story Behind Trump’s Slogan

.

THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING STORY YOU WERE NEVER TOLD ABOUT

.

Oklahoma City Bombing – What happened to the diffused bombs reported all morning

.

Oklahoma City Bombing News Reports: Unexploded bombs found in the Murrah building!

.

Black Ops Operator Comes Forward And Tells All:Cody Snodgres

.

The Real Energy Revolution Has Begun

.

Thorium Energy Technology Can Free the World from Nuclear Poisons Today

.

What was so special about 1974?

.

 

 

The Black Robe Regiment – America’s Minutemen Then and Now

Learn about the black robed regiment of the First American Revolution from historian and lecturer Phil Brooks. Then in the video at the bottom, Douglas Gabriel joins Phil to continue the discussion and examine ways that today’s clergy can lead the way back to American liberty and Christian life.

Black Robed Regiment Defined Our Liberty

.

The Black Robed Regiment: Their Christian Faith and American Liberty from Christ

by Phil Brooks

The authors of the Declaration of Independence & the US Constitution were inspired by a Christian Ethos from the Word of God in the Bible, as preached by Colonial clergymen such as Reverend John Wise of Ipswich in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the late 1600’s and early 1700’s. Reverend Wise’s writings informed the vernacular of “Life, Liberty & the Pursuit of Happiness” used by Thomas Jefferson & James Madison.

Other clergymen, like Peter Muhlenberg of Woodstock, Virginia and Jonas Clark of Lexington, Massachusetts, put their belief in Christian Liberty into action.

In the Bible, the Epistle of the Apostle Paul to the Galatians, Chapter 5, begins,

“Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.”

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Galatians-Chapter-5

These became Watch Words for Our Christian, Patriotic ‘Fore Fathers,“Stand Fast.”

In this belief, on Sunday, 21 January 1776, at the Lutheran Church of Woodstock, Virginia, Reverend Muhlenberg preached from the Book of Ecclesiastes, Chapter 3, Verses 1 – 8, which begins

“To every thing there is a season…”

After reading in Verse 8,

“…a time of war and a time of peace,”

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Ecclesiastes-Chapter-3

Rev. Muhlenberg declared, “And this is the time of war,” removing his black robes, to reveal his Colonel’s uniform underneath and then striding out of the church. Drums rolled, husbands kissed their wives then followed out to enlist. By morning’s end 162 men had quickly signed on.

Next day Rev. Muhlenberg led out 300 men, forming the nucleus of the 8th Virginia Regiment – which later saw action at Yorktown, Virginia and the surrender of the British under their commander Lord Charles Cornwallis.

BLACK ROBE REGIMENT.jpg

A year earlier on Wednesday, 19 April 1775, Reverend Jonas Clark in Lexington led his congregation members in the first fighting against the British on Lexington Green, where the “Shot Heard ‘Round the World” was fired. So began the running battle from Lexington to Concord and all the way back to Boston, during the British Column’s bloodied retreat.

Without their personal arms – sufficient to match the arms of the English Crown’s Infantry – these Massachusetts Minute Men and Our Nation might have continued to languish in Imperial Tyranny, perhaps even to the present.

These Brave American Clergymen – known thenceforth as the ‘Black Robed Regiment’ – were the Moral, Spiritual and Patriotic Embodiment of the Christian Ethic of Liberty given us by Christ and preached by the Apostle Paul to the Galatians.

It was these Patriots’ experience which produced the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution, which reads,

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment2.html

This single Constitutional provision – together with The Christian Ethos necessary for a Moral People to Govern Themselves, best expressed in the Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 7, Verse 12 – make up the core of the American Experience of Liberty – to date, the greatest degree of Freedom yet achieved among men on Earth.

Matthew 7:12 reads,

“Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them.”

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Matthew-Chapter-7

It is the continuing Foundation of American Society.

_______

 

In the video below, Douglas Gabriel and Phil Brooks look at the robed regiments of the past and call on a revival of this movement in today’s Second American Revolution.

The Black Robed Regiment Stands Again

.

The UK was not a VICTIM of WWI. It STARTED the war to expand the British empire

https://tinyurl.com/yypremby

marconi society.JPG6G marconi.JPG

Annual Marconi Society awards are heavily promoted by WNET (New York public television) where long-time producer John Jay Iselin was also Marconi Society president

iselin.jpgJohn Jay Iselin was knighted (Order of the British Empire)  in 2004 by the Queen  for his contributions to… “British TV in the United States”—that is evident SEDITION since all British TV & Radio have been government propaganda since Jul. 29, 1909 when MI5, MI6 and GC&CS were created with newspapermen

Marconi Fellows built the spy encryption Internet surveillance backdoors for the Pilgrims Society, including Sir Eric Ash, Sir Berners-Lee (CERN), Brin, Page, Cerf, Diffie, Hellman, Sir Arthur Clark, etc.

BUSTED: On Jun. 21, 1943 U.S. Supreme Court invalidated ALL of Marconi’s wireless patent claims, so why do these awards glorify stolen property?

Hao zou afi.JPG

Current Marconi sole director Hao Zoa is Chinese, promotes Bitcoin global crypto currency, and is an evident 32-yr. old cardboard cutout funded by PIMCO / Bernanke—he’s from Tsinghua University—an early member of the IBM Eclipse Foundation, thief & weaponizer of Leader Technologies social networking inventions

Sep. 23, 2019—When otherwise smart people gather religiously every year since 1974 to give themselves technology awards based on a fraudulent set of Marconi-claimed wireless inventions, something is wrong. That is exactly what the members and Fellows of The Marconi Society do every year.

Just look at their stellar list of Who’s Who Fellows. The Marconi Society Fellows are Sir Eric A. Ash (1984), Paul Baran (1991), Sir Tim Berners-Lee (2002), Claude Berrou (2005), Sergey Brin (2004), Francesco Carassa (1983), Vinton G. Cerf (1998), Andrew Chraplyvy (2009), Colin Cherry (1978), John Cioffi (2006), Arthur C. Clarke (1982), Martin Cooper (2013), Whitfield Diffie (2000), Federico Faggin (1988), James Flanagan (1992), David Forney, Jr. (1997), Robert G. Gallager (2003), Robert N. Hall (1989), Izuo Hayashi (1993), Martin Hellman (2000), Hiroshi Inose (1976), Irwin M. Jacobs (2011), Robert E. Kahn (1994) Sir Charles Kao (1985), James R. Killian (1975), Leonard Kleinrock (1986), Herwig Kogelnik (2001), Robert W. Lucky (1987), James L. Massey (1999), Robert Metcalfe (2003), Lawrence Page (2004), Yash Pal (1980), Seymour Papert (1981), Arogyaswami Paulraj (2014), David N. Payne (2008), John R. Pierce (1979), Ronald L. Rivest (2007), Arthur L. Schawlow (1977), Allan Snyder (2001), Robert Tkach (2009), Gottfried Ungerboeck (1996), Andrew Viterbi (1990), Jack Keil Wolf (2011), Jacob Ziv (1995). In 2015, the prize went to Peter T. Kirstein for bringing the internet to Europe.

The Marconi Society is an evident false front for a second tier of technology providers to the Pilgrims Society who began weaponizing media and newspapers through wired and wireless technologies starting on Jul. 23,  1909 with the founding of Empire Press Union following the Imperial Press Conference, 1909. Newspapermen from the Press Conference staffed the formation of British MI5, MI6 and GC&CS (later named GCHQ)

erskine murray.jpgThe Press Conference was organized and lead by Pilgrims Society founders. Guglielmo Marconi spoke at this 1909 Conference in support of nationalized wireless and cable technologies. James Erskine-Murray, the man who took Churchill’s order to cut the German undersea cables on Aug. 05, 1914 (see BBC News; also here) that started World War I, was at Marconi’s side in the 1909 conference. There he talked hypothetically about cutting cables—five years before he cut the Germans’.

This shows that the UK was planning to start WWI, and the British aristocracy was the perpetrator, not the victim. They achieved their Rhodes-ian goal to eliminate Germany and Russia as economic competitors to the British Empire and Anglo-American Imperial federalism.

erskine murray 2.jpg

Other histories say Telconia instead of the Alert

alert ship cable.JPG

The British people and the rest of the world were the victims of this British hegemony to control global communications, resources and power.

Full story and evidence.

https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-secret-plot-in-1909-by-anglo.html

https://tinyurl.com/yypremby

The Missing 13th Amendment: No Lawyers Allowed In Public Office

Covert Plot That Altered The U.S. Constitution Exposed, Conspiracy To Subvert The American Republic Uncovered

13th Amendment — Missing

Written by David M. Dodge, Researcher
Date: 08/01/91

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn, were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.

By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a 13th Amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. Moreover, after studying the Amendment’s language and historical context, they realized the principle intent of this “missing” 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government. So began a seven year, nationwide search for the truth surrounding the most bizarre Constitutional puzzle in American history — the unlawful removal of a ratified Amendment from the Constitution of the United States.

Since 1983, Dodge and Dunn have uncovered additional copies of the Constitution with the “missing” 13th Amendment printed in at least eighteen separate publications by ten different states and territories over four decades from 1822 to 1860. In June of this year (1991), Dodge uncovered the evidence that this missing 13th Amendment had indeed been lawfully ratified by the state of Virginia and was therefore an authentic Amendment to the American Constitution. If the evidence is correct and no logical errors have been made, a 13th Amendment restricting lawyers from serving in government was ratified in 1819 and removed from the U.S. Constitution during the tumult of the Civil War. Since the Amendment was never lawfully repealed, it is still the Law today. The implications are
enormous.

The story of this “missing” Amendment is complex and at times confusing because the political issues and vocabulary of the American Revolution were different from our own. However, there are essentially two issues: What does the Amendment mean? and, Was the Amendment ratified? Before we consider the issue of ratification, we should first understand the Amendment’s meaning and consequent current relevance.

MEANING of the 13th Amendment

The “missing” 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

At the first reading, the meaning of this 13th Amendment (also called the “title of nobility” Amendment) seems obscure; unimportant. The references to “nobility,” “honour,” “emperor,” “king,” and “prince,” lead us to dismiss this Amendment as a petty post-revolution act of spite directed against the British monarchy. The U.S. modern world of Lady Di and Prince Charles, make anti-royalist sentiments seem so archaic and quaint, that the Amendment can be ignored.

Not so. Consider some evidence of its historical significance: First, “titles of nobility” were prohibited in both Article VI of the Articles of Confederation (1777) and in Article I, Sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution of the United States (1787);

Second, although already prohibited by the Constitution, an additional “title of nobility” amendment was proposed in 1789, again in 1810, and according to Dodge, finally ratified in 1819. Clearly, the founding fathers saw such a serious threat in “titles of nobility” and “honors” that anyone receiving them would forfeit their citizenship. Since the government prohibited “titles of nobility” several times over four decades, and went through the amending process (even though “titles of nobility” were already prohibited by the Constitution), it’s obvious that the Amendment carried much more significance for our founding fathers than is readily apparent today.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

To understand the meaning of this “missing” 13th Amendment, we must understand its historical context — the era surrounding the American Revolution. We tend to regard the notion of “Democracy” as benign, harmless, and politically unremarkable. But at the time of the American Revolution, King George III and the other monarchies of Europe saw Democracy as an unnatural, ungodly ideological threat, every bit as dangerously radical as Communism was once regarded by modern Western nations. Just as the 1917 Communist Revolution in Russia spawned other revolutions around the world, the American Revolution provided an example and incentive for people all over the world to overthrow their European monarchies.

Even though the Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War in 1783, the simple fact of our existence threatened the monarchies. The United States stood as a heroic role model for other nations, that inspired them to also struggle against oppressive monarchies. The French Revolution (1789-1799) and the Polish national uprising (1794) were in part encouraged by the American Revolution. Though we stood like a beacon of hope for most of the world, the monarchies regarded the United States as a political typhoid Mary, the principal source of radical democracy that was destroying monarchies around the world. The monarchies must have realized that if the principal source of that infection could be destroyed, the rest of the world might avoid the contagion and the monarchies would be saved. Their survival at stake, the monarchies sought to destroy or subvert the American system of government. Knowing they couldn’t destroy us militarily, they resorted to more covert methods of political subversion, employing spies and secret agents skilled in bribery and legal deception — it was, perhaps, the first “cold war”. Since governments run on money, politicians run for money, and money is the usual enticement to commit treason, much of the monarchy’s counter-revolutionary efforts emanated
from English banks.

DON’T BANK ON IT (Modern Banking System)

The essence of banking was once explained by Sir Josiah Stamp, a former president of the Bank of England:”The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin… Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again… Take this great power away from them, or if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.”

The last great abuse of the U.S. banking system caused the depression of the 1930’s. Today’s abuses may cause another. Current S&L and bank scandals illustrate the ongoing relationships between banks, lawyers, politicians, and government agencies (look at the current BCCI bank scandal, involving lawyer Clark Clifford, politician Jimmy Carter, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and even the CIA). These scandals are the direct result of years of law-breaking by an alliance of bankers and lawyers using their influence and money to corrupt the political process and rob the public. (Think you’re not being robbed? Guess who’s going to pay the bill for the excesses of the S&L’s, U.S.-taxpayer? You are.) The systematic robbery of productive individuals by parasitic bankers and lawyers is not a recent phenomenon. This abuse is a human tradition that predates the Bible and spread from Europe to America despite early colonial prohibitions.

When the first United States Bank was chartered by Congress in 1790, there were only three state banks in existence. At one time, banks were prohibited by law in most states because many of the early settlers were all too familiar with the practices of the European goldsmith banks. Goldsmith banks were safe-houses used to store client’s gold. In exchange for the deposited gold, customers were issued notes (paper money) which were redeemable in gold. The goldsmith bankers quickly succumbed to the temptation to issue “extra” notes, (unbacked by gold). Why? Because the “extra” notes enriched the bankers by allowing them to buy property with notes for gold that they did not own, gold that did not even exist. Colonists knew that bankers occasionally printed too much paper money, found themselves over-leveraged, and caused a “run on the bank”. If the bankers lacked sufficient gold to meet the demand, the paper money became worthless and common citizens left holding the paper were ruined. Although over-leveraged bankers were sometime hung, the bankers continued printing extra money to increase their fortunes at the expense of the productive members of society. (The practice continues to this day, and offers “sweetheart” loans to bank insiders, and even provides the foundation for deficit spending and the U.S. Federal government’s unbridled growth.)

PAPER MONEY

If the colonists forgot the lessons of goldsmith bankers, the American Revolution refreshed their memories. To finance the war, Congress authorized the printing of continental bills of credit in an amount not to exceed $200,000,000. The States issued another $200,000,000 in paper notes. Ultimately, the value of the paper money fell so low that they were soon traded on speculation from 5000 to 1000 paper bills for one coin. It’s often suggested that the U.S. Constitution’s prohibition against a paper economy — “No State shall… make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a tender in Payment of Debts” — was a tool of the wealthy to be worked to the disadvantage of all others. But only in a “paper” economy can money reproduce itself and increase the claims of the wealthy at the expense of the productive.

“Paper money,” said Pelatiah Webster, “polluted the equity of our laws, turned them into engines of oppression, corrupted the justice of our public administration, destroyed the fortunes of thousands who had confidence in it, enervated the trade, husbandry, and manufactures of U.S. country, and went far to destroy the morality of U.S. people.”

CONSPIRACIES

A few examples of the attempts by the monarchies and banks that almost succeeded in destroying the United States:

According to the Tennessee Laws (1715-1820, vol. II, p. 774), in the 1794 Jay Treaty, the United States agreed to pay 600,000 pounds sterling to King George III, as reparations for the American revolution. The Senate ratified the treaty in secret session and ordered that it not be published. When Benjamin Franklin’s grandson published it anyway, the exposure and resulting public uproar so angered the Congress that it passed the Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) so federal judges could prosecute editors and publishers for reporting the truth about the government. Since we had won the Revolutionary War, why would U.S. Senators agree to pay reparations to the loser? And why would they agree to pay 600,000 pounds sterling, eleven years after the war ended? It doesn’t make sense, especially in light of Senate’s secrecy and later fury over being exposed, unless we assume U.S. Senators had been bribed to serve the British monarchy and betray the American people. That’s subversion.

The United States Bank had been opposed by the Jeffersonians from the beginning, but the Federalists (the pro-monarchy party) won out in its establishment. The initial capitalization was $10,000,000 — 80% of which would be owned by foreign bankers. Since the bank was authorized to lend up to $20,000,000 (double its paid in capital), it was a profitable deal for both the government and the bankers since they could lend, and collect interest on, $10,000,000 that didn’t exist.

However, the European bankers outfoxed the government and by 1796, the government owed the bank $6,200,000 and was forced to sell its shares. (By 1802, the U.S. government owned no stock in the United States Bank.) The sheer power of the banks and their ability to influence representative government by economic manipulation and outright bribery was exposed in 1811, when the people discovered that European banking interests owned 80% of the bank. Congress therefore refused to renew the bank’s charter. This led to the withdrawal of $7,000,000 in specie by European investors, which in turn, precipitated an economic recession, and the War of 1812. That’s destruction.

There are undoubtedly other examples of the monarchy’s efforts to subvert or destroy the United States; some are common knowledge, others remain to be disclosed to the public. For example, David Dodge discovered a book called “2 VA LAW” in the Library of Congress Law Library. According to Dodge, “This is an un-catalogued book in the rare book section that reveals a plan to overthrow the constitutional government by secret agreements engineered by the lawyers. That is one of the reasons why this Amendment was ratified by Virginia and the notification was lost in the mail. There is no public record that this book exists.” That may sound surprising, but according to The Gazette (5/10/91), “the Library of Congress has 349,402 un-catalogued rare books and 13.9 million un-catalogued rare manuscripts.” There may be secrets buried in that mass of documents even more astonishing than a missing Constitutional Amendment.

TITLES OF NOBILITY

In seeking to rule the world and destroy the United States, bankers committed many crimes. Foremost among these crimes were fraud, conversion, and plain old theft. To escape prosecution for their crimes, the bankers did the same thing any career criminal does. They hired and formed alliances with the best lawyers and judges money could buy. These alliances, originally forged in Europe (particularly in Great Britain), spread to the colonies, and later into the newly formed United States of America.

Despite their criminal foundation, these alliances generated wealth, and ultimately, respectability. Like any modern member of organized crime, English bankers and lawyers wanted to be admired as “legitimate businessmen”. As their criminal fortunes grew so did their usefulness, so the British monarchy legitimized these thieves by granting them “titles of nobility”.

Historically, the British peerage system referred to knights as “Squires” and to those who bore the knight’s shields as “Esquires”. As lances, shields, and physical violence gave way to the more civilized means of theft, the pen grew mightier (and more profitable) than the sword, and the clever wielders of those pens (bankers and lawyers) came to hold titles of nobility. The most common title was “Esquire” (used, even today, by some lawyers).

INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION

In Colonial America, attorneys trained attorneys but most held no “title of nobility” or “honor”. There was no requirement that one be a lawyer to hold the position of district attorney, attorney general, or judge; a citizen’s “counsel of choice” was not restricted to a lawyer; there were no state or national bar associations. The only organization that certified lawyers was the International Bar Association (IBA), chartered by the King of England, headquartered in London, and closely associated with the international banking system. Lawyers admitted to the IBA received the rank “Esquire” — a “title of nobility”. “Esquire” was the principle title of nobility which the 13th Amendment sought to prohibit from the United States.

Why? Because the loyalty of “Esquire” lawyers was suspect. Bankers and lawyers with an “Esquire” behind their names were agents of the monarchy, members of an organization whose principal purposes were political, not economic, and regarded with the same wariness that some people today reserve for members of the KGB or the CIA.

Article 1, Sect. 9 of the Constitution sought to prohibit the International Bar Association (or any other agency that granted titles of nobility) from operating in America. But the Constitution neglected to specify a penalty, so the prohibition was ignored, and agents of the monarchy continued to infiltrate and influence the government (as in the Jay Treaty and the US Bank charter incidents). Therefore, a “title of nobility” amendment that specified a penalty (loss of citizenship) was proposed in 1789, and again in 1810. The meaning of the amendment is seen in its intent to prohibit persons having titles of nobility and loyalties to foreign governments and bankers from voting, holding public office, or using their skills to subvert the government.

HONOR

The missing Amendment is referred to as the “title of nobility” Amendment, but the second prohibition against “honour” (honor), may be more significant.

According to David Dodge, Tom Dunn, and Webster’s Dictionary, the archaic definition of “honor” (as used when the 13th Amendment was ratified) meant anyone “obtaining or having an advantage or privilege over another”. A contemporary example of an “honor” granted to only a few Americans is the privilege of being a judge: Lawyers can be judges and exercise the attendant privileges and powers; non-lawyers cannot.

By prohibiting “honors”, the missing Amendment prohibits any advantage or privilege that would grant some citizens an unequal opportunity to achieve or exercise political power. Therefore, the second meaning (intent) of the 13th Amendment was to ensure political equality among all American citizens, by prohibiting anyone, even government officials, from claiming or exercising a special privilege or power (an “honor”) over other citizens.

If this interpretation is correct, “honor” would be the key concept in the 13th Amendment. Why? Because, while “titles of nobility” may no longer apply in today’s political system, the concept of “honor” remains relevant. For example, anyone who had a specific “immunity” from lawsuits which were not afforded to all citizens, would be enjoying a separate privilege, an “honor”, and would therefore forfeit his right to vote or hold public office. Think of the “immunities” from lawsuits that U.S. judges, lawyers, politicians, and bureaucrats currently enjoy. As another example, think of all the “special interest” legislation the U.S. government passes: “special interests” are simply euphemisms for “special privileges” (honors).

WHAT IF? (Implications if Restored)

If the missing 13th Amendment were restored, “special interests” and “immunities” might be rendered unconstitutional. The prohibition against “honors” (privileges) would compel the entire government to operate under the same laws as the citizens of this nation. Without their current personal immunities (honors), US judges and I.R.S. agents would be unable to abuse common citizens without fear of legal liability. If this 13th Amendment were restored, the entire U.S. Government would have to conduct itself according to the same standards of decency, respect, law, and liability as the rest of the nation. If this Amendment and the term “honor” were applied today, U.S. Government’s ability to systematically coerce and abuse the public would be all but eliminated.

Imagine! A government without special privileges or immunities. How could we describe it? It would be … almost like … a government … of the people … by the people … for the people! Imagine: a government … whose members were truly accountable to the public; a government that could not systematically exploit its own people! It’s unheard of … it’s never been done before. Not ever in the entire history of the world.

Bear in mind that Senator George Mitchell of Maine and the U.S. National Archives concede this 13th Amendment was proposed by Congress in 1810. However, they explain that there were seventeen states when Congress proposed the “title of nobility” Amendment; that ratification required the thirteen states, but since only twelve states supported the Amendment, it was not ratified. The Government Printing Office agrees; it currently prints copies of the Constitution of the United States which include the
“title of nobility” Amendment as proposed, but un-ratified.

Even if this 13th Amendment were never ratified, even if Dodge and Dunn’s research or reasoning is flawed or incomplete, it would still be an extraordinary story. Can you imagine, can you understand how close the US came to having a political paradise, right here on Earth? Do you realize what an extraordinary gift our forebears tried to bequeath us? And how close we came? One vote. One state’s vote.

The federal government concedes that twelve states voted to ratify this Amendment between 1810 and 1812. But they argue that ratification require thirteen states, so the Amendment lays stillborn in history, unratified for lack of a just one more state’s support. One vote. David Dodge, however, says one more state did ratify, and he claims he has the evidence to prove it.

PARADISE LOST, RATIFICATION FOUND

In 1789, the House of Representatives compiled a list of possible Constitutional Amendments, some of which would ultimately become our Bill of Rights. The House proposed seventeen; the Senate reduced the list to twelve. During this process that Senator Tristrain Dalton (Mass.) proposed an Amendment seeking to prohibit and provide a penalty for any American accepting a “title of Nobility” (RG 46 Records of the U.S. Senate). Although it wasn’t passed, this was the first time a “title of nobility” amendment was proposed.

Twenty years later, in January, 1810, Senator Reed proposed another “Title of Nobility” Amendment (History of Congress, Proceedings of the Senate, p. 529-530). On April 27, 1810, the Senate voted to pass this 13th Amendment by a vote of 26 to 1; the House resolved in the affirmative 87 to 3; and the following resolve was sent to the States for ratification:

“If any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

The Constitution requires three-quarters of the states to ratify a proposed amendment before it may be added to the Constitution. When Congress proposed the “Title of Nobility” Amendment in 1810, there were states, thirteen of which would have to ratify for the Amendment to be adopted. According to the National Archives, the following is a list of the twelve states that ratified, and their dates of ratification:

Maryland, Dec. 25, 1810
Kentucky, Jan. 31, 1811
Ohio, Jan. 31, 1811
Delaware, Feb. 2, 1811
Pennsylvania, Feb. 6, 1811
New Jersey, Feb. 13, 1811
Vermont, Oct. 24, 1811
Tennessee, Nov. 21, 1811
Georgia, Dec. 13, 1811
North Carolina, Dec. 23, 1811
Massachusetts, Feb. 27, 1812
New Hampshire, Dec. 10, 1812

Before a thirteenth state could ratify, the War of 1812 broke out with England. By the time the war ended in 1814, the British had burned the Capitol, the Library of Congress, and most of the records of the first 38 years of government. Whether there was a connection between the proposed “title of nobility” amendment and the War of 1812 is not known. However, the momentum to ratify the proposed Amendment was lost in the tumult of war.

Then, four years later, on December 31, 1817, the House of Representatives resolved that President Monroe inquire into the status of this Amendment. In a letter dated February 6, 1818, President Monroe reported to the House that the Secretary of State Adams had written to the governors of Virginia, South Carolina and Connecticut to tell them that the proposed Amendment had been ratified by twelve States and rejected by two (New York and Rhode Island), and asked the governors to notify him of their legislature’s position. (House Document No. 76) (This, and other letters written by the President and the Secretary of State during the month of February, 1818, note only that the proposed Amendment had not yet been ratified. However, these letters would later become crucial because, in the absence of additional information they would be interpreted to mean the amendment was never ratified).

On February 28, 1818, Secretary of State Adams reported the rejection of the Amendment by South Carolina. [House Doc. No. 129]. There are no further entries regarding the ratification of the 13th Amendment in the Journals of Congress; whether Virginia ratified is neither confirmed nor denied. Likewise, a search through the executive papers of Governor Preston of Virginia does not reveal any correspondence from Secretary of State Adams. (However, there is a journal entry in the Virginia House that the Governor presented the House with an official letter and documents from Washington within a time frame that conceivably includes receipt of Adams’ letter.) Again, no evidence of ratification; none of denial.

However, on March 10, 1819, the Virginia legislature passed Act No. 280 (Virginia Archives of Richmond, “misc.’ file, p. 299 for micro-film): “Be it enacted by the General Assembly, that there shall be published an edition of the Laws of this Commonwealth in which shall be contained the following matters, that is to say: the Constitution of the united States and the amendments thereto…” This act was the specific legislated instructions on what was, by law, to be included in the re-publication (a special edition) of the Virginia Civil Code. The Virginia Legislature had already agreed that all Acts were to go into effect on the same day — the day that the Act to re-publish the Civil Code was enacted. Therefore, the 13th Amendment’s official date of ratification would be the date of re-publication of the Virginia Civil Code: March 12, 1819.

The Delegates knew Virginia was the last of the 13 States that were necessary for the ratification of the 13th Amendment. They also knew there were powerful forces allied against this ratification so they took extraordinary measures to make sure that it was published in sufficient quantity (4,000 copies were ordered, almost triple their usual order), and instructed the printer to send a copy to President James Monroe as well as James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. (The printer, Thomas Ritchie, was bonded. He was required to be extremely accurate in his research and his printing, or he would forfeit his bond.)

In this fashion, Virginia announced the ratification: by publication and dissemination of the Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution.  There is question as to whether Virginia ever formally notified the Secretary of State that they had ratified this 13th Amendment. Some have argued that because such notification was not received (or at least, not recorded), the Amendment was therefore not legally ratified. However, printing by a legislature is prima facie evidence of ratification. Further, there is no Constitutional requirement that the Secretary of State, or anyone else, be officially notified to complete the ratification process. The Constitution only requires that three-fourths of the states ratify for an Amendment to be added to the Constitution. If three-quarters of the states ratify, the Amendment is passed. Period. The Constitution is otherwise silent on what procedure should be used to announce, confirm, or communicate the ratification of amendments.

Knowing they were the last state necessary to ratify the Amendment, the Virginians had every right announce their own and the nation’s ratification of the Amendment by publishing it on a special edition of the Constitution, and so they did.

Word of Virginia’s 1819 ratification spread throughout the States and both Rhode Island and Kentucky published the new Amendment in 1822. Ohio first published in 1824. Maine ordered 10,000 copies of the Constitution with the 13th Amendment to be printed for use in the schools in 1825, and again in 1831 for their Census Edition. Indiana Revised Laws of 1831 published the 13th Article on p. 20. Northwestern Territories published in 1833. Ohio published in 1831 and 1833. Then came the Wisconsin Territory in 1839; Iowa Territory in 1843; Ohio again, in 1848; Kansas Statutes in 1855; and Nebraska Territory six times in a row from 1855 to 1860. So far, David Dodge has identified eleven different states or territories that printed the Amendment in twenty separate publications over forty-one years. And more editions including this 13th Amendment are sure to be discovered. Clearly, Dodge is onto something.

You might be able to convince some of the people, or maybe even all of them, for a little while, that this 13th Amendment was never ratified. Maybe you can show them that the ten legislatures which ordered it published eighteen times we’ve discovered (so far) consisted of ignorant politicians who don’t know their amendments from their… ahh, articles. You might even be able to convince the public that our U.S. forefathers never meant to “outlaw” public servants who pushed people around, accepted bribes or special favors to “look the other way.” Maybe. But before you do, there’s an awful lot of evidence to be explained.

THE AMENDMENT DISAPPEARS

In 1829, the following note appears on p. 23, Vol. 1 of the New York Revised Statutes:

“In the edition of the Laws of the U.S. before referred to, there is an amendment printed as article 13, prohibiting citizens from accepting titles of nobility or honor, or presents, offices, &c. from foreign nations. But, by a message of the president of the United States of the 4th of February, 1818, in answer to a resolution of the house of representatives, it appears that this amendment had been ratified only by 12 states, and therefore had not been adopted. See Vol. IV of the printed papers of the 1st session of the 15th congress, No. 76.” In 1854, a similar note appeared in the Oregon Statutes. Both notes refer to the Laws of the United States, 1st vol. p. 73 (or 74).

It’s not yet clear whether the 13th Amendment was published in Laws of the United States, 1st Vol., prematurely, by accident, in anticipation of Virginia’s ratification, or as part of a plot to discredit the Amendment by making it appear that only twelve States had ratified. Whether the Laws of the United States Vol. 1 (carrying the 13th Amendment) was re-called or made-up is unknown. In fact, it’s not even clear that the specified volume was actually printed — the Law Library of the Library of Congress has no record of its existence.

However, because the noted authors reported no further references to the 13th Amendment after the Presidential letter of February, 1818, they apparently assumed the ratification process had ended in failure at that time. If so, they neglected to seek information on the Amendment after 1818, or at the state level, and therefore missed the evidence of Virginia’s ratification. This opinion — assuming that the Presidential letter of February, 1818, was the last word on the Amendment — has persisted to this day.

In 1849, Virginia decided to revise the 1819 Civil Code of Virginia (which had contained the 13th Amendment for 30 years). It was at that time that one of the code’s revisers (a lawyer named Patton) wrote to the Secretary of the Navy, William B. Preston, asking if this Amendment had been ratified or appeared by mistake. Preston wrote to J. M. Clayton, the Secretary of State, who replied that this Amendment was not ratified by a sufficient number of States. This conclusion was based upon the information that Secretary of State John Quincy Adams had provided the House of Representatives in 1818, before Virginia’s ratification in 1819. (Even today, the Congressional Research Service tells anyone asking about this 13th Amendment this same story: that only twelve states, not the requisite thirteen, had ratified.)

However, despite Clayton’s opinion, the Amendment continued to be published in various states and territories for at least another eleven years (the last known publication was in the Nebraska territory in 1860). Once again the 13th Amendment was caught in the riptides of American politics. South Carolina seceded from the Union in December of 1860, signaling the onset of the Civil War. In March, 1861, President Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated.

Later in 1861, another proposed amendment, also numbered thirteen, was signed by President Lincoln. This was the only proposed amendment that was ever signed by a president. That resolve to amend read:

“ARTICLE THIRTEEN, No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.”

In other words, President Lincoln had signed a resolve that would have permitted slavery, and upheld states’ rights. Only one State, Illinois, ratified this proposed amendment before the Civil War broke out in 1861. In the tumult of 1865, the original 13th Amendment was finally removed from the US Constitution. On January 31, another 13th Amendment (which prohibited slavery in Sect. 1, and ended states’ rights in Sect. 2) was proposed. On April 9, the Civil War ended with General Lee’s surrender. On April 14, President Lincoln (who, in 1861, had signed the proposed Amendment that would have allowed slavery and states rights) was assassinated. On December 6, the “new” 13th Amendment loudly prohibiting slavery (and quietly surrendering states rights to the federal government) was ratified, replacing and effectively erasing the original 13th Amendment that had prohibited “titles of nobility” and “honors”.

SIGNIFICANCE OF REMOVAL

To create the present oligarchy (rule by lawyers) which the U.S. now endures, the lawyers first had to remove the 13th “titles of nobility” Amendment that might otherwise have kept them in check. In fact, it was not until after the Civil War and after the disappearance of this 13th Amendment, that American bar associations began to appear and exercise political power.

Since the unlawful deletion of the 13th Amendment, the newly developing bar associations began working diligently to create a system wherein lawyers took on a title of privilege and nobility as “Esquires” and received the “honor” of offices and positions (like district attorney or judge) that only they could hold. By virtue of these titles, honors, and special privileges, lawyers have assumed political and economic advantages over the majority of U.S. citizens. Through these privileges, they have nearly established a two-tiered citizenship in this nation where a majority may vote, but only a minority (lawyers) may run for political office. This two-tiered citizenship is clearly contrary to Americans’ political interests, the nation’s economic welfare, and the Constitution’s egalitarian spirit.

The significance of this missing 13th Amendment and its deletion from the Constitution is this: Since the amendment was never lawfully nullified, it is still in full force and effect and is the Law of the land. If public support could be awakened, this missing Amendment might provide a legal basis to challenge many existing laws and court decisions previously made by lawyers who were unconstitutionally elected or appointed to their positions of power; it might even mean the removal of lawyers from the current US government system.

At the very least, this missing 13th Amendment demonstrates that two centuries ago, lawyers were recognized as enemies of the people and nation. Some things never change.

THOSE WHO CANNOT RECALL HISTORY …. Heed warnings of Founding Fathers … In his farewell address, George Washington warned of “… change by usurpation; for through this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.” In 1788, Thomas Jefferson proposed that we have a Declaration of Rights similar to Virginia’s. Three of his suggestions were “freedom of commerce against monopolies, trial by jury in all cases” and “no suspensions of the
habeas corpus.”

No doubt Washington’s warning and Jefferson’s ideas were dismissed as redundant by those who knew the law. Who would have dreamed the U.S. legal system would become a monopoly against freedom when that was one of the primary causes for the rebellion against King George III?

Yet, the denial of trial by jury is now commonplace in the U.S. courts, and habeas corpus, for crimes against the state, is suspended. (By crimes against the state, I refer to “political crimes” where there is no injured party and the corpus delicti [evidence] is equally imaginary.)

The authority to create monopolies was judge-made law by Supreme Court Justice John Marshall, et al during the early 1800’s. Judges (and lawyers) granted to themselves the power to declare the acts of the People “un-Constitutional”, waited until their decision was grandfathered, and then granted themselves a monopoly by creating the bar associations. Although Article VI of the U.S. Constitution mandates that executive orders and treaties are binding upon the states (“… and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”), the supreme Court has held that the Bill of Rights is not binding upon the states, and thereby resurrected many of the complaints enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, exactly as Thomas Jefferson foresaw in “Notes on the State of Virginia”, Query 17, p. 161, 1784:

“Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless… the time for fixing every essential right on a legal basis is [now] while our rulers are honest, and ourselves united. From the conclusion of this war we shall be going downhill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves, but in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will remain on us long, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion.”

We await the inevitable convulsion. Only two questions remain: Will we fight to revive our rights? Or, Will we meekly submit as our last remaining rights expire, surrendered to the courts, and perhaps to a “new world order”?

MORE EDITIONS FOUND

As we go to press, I’ve received information from a researcher in Indiana, and another in Dallas, who have found five more editions of statutes that include the Constitution and the missing 13th Amendment. These editions were printed by Ohio, 1819; Connecticut (one of the states that voted against ratifying the Amendment), 1835; Kansas, 1861; and the Colorado Territory, 1865 and 1867.

These finds are important because:

They offer independent confirmation of Dodge’s claims; and They extend the known dates of publication from Nebraska 1860 (Dodge’s
most recent find), to Colorado in 1867.

The most intriguing discovery was the 1867 Colorado Territory edition which includes both the “missing” 13th Amendment and the current 13th Amendment (freeing the slaves), on the same page. The current 13th Amendment is listed as the 14th Amendment in the 1867 Colorado edition. This investigation has followed a labyrinthine path that started with the questions about how the U.S. courts evolved from a temple of the Bill of Rights to the current star chamber and whether this situation had anything to do with retiring chief Justice Burger’s warning that we were “about to lose our Constitution”. My seven year investigation has been fruitful beyond belief; the information on the missing 13th Amendment is only a “drop in the bucket” of the information I have discovered. Still, the research continues, and by definition, is never truly complete.

ARGUMENTS

Imagine a nation which prohibited at least some lawyers from serving in government. Imagine a government prohibited from writing laws granting “honors” (special privileges, immunities, or advantages) to individuals, groups, or government officials. Imagine a government that could only write laws that applied to everyone, even themselves, equally. It’s never been done before. Not once. But it has been tried: In 1810 the Congress of the United States proposed a 13th Amendment to the Constitution that might have given us just that sort of equality and political paradise. The story begins (again) in 1983, when David Dodge and
Tom Dunn discovered an 1825 edition of the Maine Civil Code which contained the U.S. Constitution and a 13th Amendment which no longer appears on the Constitution:

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

This Amendment would have restricted at least some lawyers from serving in government, and would prohibit legislators from passing any special interest legislation, tax breaks, or special immunities for anyone, not even themselves. It might have guaranteed a level of political equality in this nation that most people can’t even imagine. Since 1983, researchers have uncovered evidence that:

The 13th Amendment prohibiting “titles of nobility” and “honors” appeared in at least 30 editions of the Constitution of the United States which were printed by at least 14 states or territories between 1819 and 1867; and This amendment quietly disappeared from the Constitution near the end of the Civil War.

Either this Amendment was: Unratified and mistakenly published for almost 50 years; or Ratified in 1819, and then illegally removed from the Constitution by 1867.

If this 13th Amendment was unratified and mistakenly published, the story has remained unnoticed in American history for over a century. If so, it’s at least a good story — an extraordinary historical anecdote.

On the other hand, if Dodge is right and the Amendment was truly ratified, an Amendment has been subverted from our Constitution. If so, this “missing” Amendment would still be the Law, and this story could be one of the most important stories in American History. Whatever the answer, it’s certain that something extraordinary happened to our Constitution between 1819 and 1867.

PROS AND CONS (for Ratification)

Of course, there are two sides to this issue. David Dodge, the principal researcher, argues that this 13th Amendment was ratified in 1819 and then subverted from the Constitution near the end of the Civil War. U.S. Senator George Mitchell of Maine, and Mr. Dane Hartgrove (Acting Assistant Chief, Civil Reference Branch of the National Archives) have argued that the Amendment was never properly ratified and only published in error. There is some agreement. Both sides agree the Amendment was proposed by Congress in 1810. Both sides also agree that the proposed Amendment required the support of at least thirteen states to be ratified. Both sides agree that between 1810 and 1812 twelve states voted to support ratification. The pivotal issue is whether Virginia ratified or rejected the proposed Amendment. Dodge contends Virginia voted to support the Amendment in 1819, and so the Amendment was truly ratified and should still be a part of our Constitution. Senator Mitchell and Mr. Hartgrove disagree, arguing that Virginia did not ratify. Unfortunately, several decades of Virginia’s legislative journals were misplaced or destroyed (possibly during the Civil War; possibly during the 1930’s). Consequently, neither side has found absolute proof that the Virginia legislature voted for (or against) ratification. A series of letters exchanged in 1991 between David Dodge, Sen. Mitchell, and Mr. Hartgrove illuminate the various points of disagreement. After Dodge’s initial report of a “missing” Amendment in the 1825 Maine Civil Code, Sen. Mitchell explained that this edition was a one-time publishing error: “The Maine Legislature mistakenly printed the proposed Amendment in the Maine Constitution as having been adopted. As you know, this was a mistake, as it was not ratified.”

Further, “All editions of the Maine Constitution printed after 1820 [sic] exclude the proposed amendment; only the originals contain this error.” Dodge dug deeper, found other editions (there are 30, to date) of state and territorial civil codes that contained the missing Amendment, and thereby demonstrated that the Maine publication was not a “one-time” publishing error.

YES VIRGINIA, THERE IS A RATIFICATION

After examining Dodge’s evidence of multiple publications of the “missing” Amendment, Sen. Mitchell and Mr. Hartgrove conceded the Amendment had been published by several states and was ratified by twelve of the seventeen states in the Union in 1810. However, because the Constitution requires that three-quarters of the states vote to ratify an Amendment. Mitchell and Hartgrove insisted that the 13th Amendment was published in error because it was passed by only twelve, not thirteen States. Dodge investigated which seventeen states were in the Union at the time the Amendment was proposed, which states had ratified, which states had rejected the amendment, and determined that the issue hung on whether one last state (Virginia) had or had not, voted to ratify.

After several years of searching the Virginia state archive, Dodge made a crucial discovery: In Spring of 1991, he found a misplaced copy of the 1819 Virginia Civil Code which included the “missing” 13th Amendment. Dodge notes that, curiously, “There is no public record that shows this book [the 1819 Virginia Civil Code] exists. It is not catalogued as a holding of the Library of Congress nor is it in the National Union Catalogue. Neither the state law library nor the law school in Portland were able to find any trace that this book exists in any of their computer programs.”

Dodge sent photo-copies of the 1819 Virginia Civil Code to Sen. Mitchell and Mr. Hartgrove, and explained that, “Under legislative construction, it is considered prima facie evidence that what is published as the official acts of the legislature are the official acts.” By publishing the Amendment as ratified in an official publication, Virginia demonstrated that they:

Knew they were the last state whose vote was necessary to ratify this 13th Amendment; Had voted to ratify the Amendment; and Were publishing the Amendment in a special edition of their Civil Code as an official notice to the world that the Amendment had indeed been ratified.

Dodge concluded, “Unless there is competing evidence to the contrary, it must be held that the Constitution of the United States was officially amended to exclude from its body of citizens any who accepted or claimed a title of nobility or accepted any special favors. Foremost in this category of ex-citizens are bankers and lawyers.”

RATIONALES (for Ratification)

Undeterred, Sen. Mitchell wrote that, “Article XIII did not receive the three-fourths vote required from the states within the time limit to be ratified.” (Although his language is imprecise, Sen. Mitchell seems to concede that although the Amendment had failed to satisfy the “time limit”, the required three-quarters of the states did vote to ratify.) Dodge replies: “Contrary to your assertion.., there was no time limit for amendment ratification in 1811. Any time limit is now established by Congress in the Resolves for proposed amendments.”

In fact, ratification time limits didn’t start until 1917, when Sect. 3 of the Eighteenth Amendment stated that, “This Article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified within seven years from the date of submission … to the States by Congress.” A similar time limit is now included on other proposed Amendments, but there was no specified time limit when the 13th Amendment was proposed in 1810 or ratified in 1819. Sen. Mitchell remained determined to find some rationale, somewhere, that would defeat Dodge’s persistence. Although Sen. Mitchell implicitly conceded that his “published by error” and “time limit” arguments were invalid, he continued to grope for reasons to dispute the ratification: “… regardless of whether the state of Virginia did ratify the proposed Thirteenth Amendment… on March 12, 1819, this approval would not have been sufficient to amend the Constitution.

In 1819, there were twenty-one states in the United States and any amendment would have required approval of sixteen states to amend the Constitution. According to your own research, Virginia would have only been the thirteenth state to approve the proposed amendment.” Dodge replies: “Article V [amendment procedures] of the Constitution is silent on the question of whether or not the framers meant three-fourths of the states at the time the proposed amendment is submitted to the states for ratification, or three-fourths of the states that exist at some future point in time. Since only the existing states were involved in the debate and vote of Congress on the Resolve proposing an Amendment, it is reasonable that ratification be limited to those States that took an active part in the Amendment process.”

Dodge demonstrated this rationale by pointing out that, “President Monroe had his Secretary of State… [ask the] governors of Virginia, South Carolina, and Connecticut, in January, 1818, as to the status of the amendment in their respective states. The four new states (Louisiana, Indiana, Mississippi, and Illinois) that were added to the union between 1810 and 1818 were not even considered.”

From a modern perspective, it seems strange that not all states would be included in the ratification process. But bear in mind that this perspective is based on life in a stable nation that’s added only five new states in this century — about one every eighteen years. However, between 1803 and 1821 (when the 13th Amendment ratification drama unfolded), they added eight states — almost one new state every two years. This rapid national growth undoubtedly fostered national attitudes different from our own. The government had to be filled with the euphoria of a growing Republic that expected to quickly add new states all the way to the Pacific Ocean and the Isthmus of Panama. The government would not willingly compromise or complicate that growth potential with procedural obstacles; to involve every new state in each on-going ratification could inadvertently slow the nation’s growth.

For example, if a territory petitioned to join the Union while an Amendment was being considered, its access to statehood might depend on whether the territory expected to ratify or reject a proposed amendment. If the territory was expected to ratify the proposed Amendment government, officials who favored the Amendment might try to accelerate the territory’s entry into the Union. On the other hand, those opposed to the Amendment might try to slow or even deny a particular territory’s statehood. These complications could unnecessarily slow the entry of new states into the nation, or restrict the nation’s ability to pass new Amendments. Neither possibility could appeal to politicians. Whatever the reason, the House of Representatives resolved to ask only Connecticut, South Carolina, and Virginia for their decision on ratifying the 13th Amendment — they did not ask for the decisions of the four new states. Since the new states had Representatives in the House who did not protest when the resolve was passed, it’s apparent that even the new states agreed that they should not be included in the ratification process.

In 1818, the President, the House of Representatives, the Secretary of State, the four “new” states, and the seventeen “old” states, all clearly believed that the support of just thirteen states was required to ratify the 13th Amendment. That being so, Virginia’s vote to ratify was legally sufficient to ratify the “missing’ Amendment in 1819 (and would still be so today).

INSULT TO INJURY

Apparently persuaded by Dodge’s various arguments and proofs that the “missing” 13th Amendment had satisfied the Constitutional requirements for ratification, Mr. Hartgrove (National Archives) wrote back that Virginia had nevertheless failed to satisfy the bureaucracy’s procedural requirements for ratification:

“Under current legal provisions, the Archivist of the United States is empowered to certify that he has in his custody the correct number of state certificates of ratification of a proposed Constitutional amendment to constitute its ratification by the United States of America as a whole. In the nineteenth century, that function was performed by the Secretary of State. Clearly, the Secretary of State never received a certificate of ratification of the title of nobility amendment from the Commonwealth of Virginia, which is why that amendment failed to become the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

This is an extraordinary admission. Mr. Hartgrove implicitly concedes that the 13th Amendment was ratified by Virginia and satisfied the Constitution’s ratification requirements. However, Hartgrove then insists that the ratification was nevertheless justly denied because the Secretary of State was not properly notified with a “certificate of ratification”. In other words, the government’s last, best argument that the 13th Amendment was not ratified boils down to this:

Though the Amendment satisfied Constitutional requirement for ratification, it is nonetheless missing from our Constitution simply because a single, official sheet of paper is missing in Washington. Mr. Hartgrove implies that despite the fact that three-quarters of the States in the Union voted to ratify an Amendment, the will of the legislators and the people of this nation should be denied because somebody screwed up and lost a single “certificate of ratification”. This “certificate” may be missing because either:

Virginia failed to file a proper notice; or The notice was “lost in the mail”; or The notice was lost, unrecorded, misplaced, or intentionally destroyed, by some bureaucrat in Washington D.C. This final excuse insults every American’s political rights, but Mr.
Hartgrove nevertheless offers a glimmer of hope: If the National Archives “received a certificate of ratification of the title of nobility amendment from the Commonwealth of Virginia, we would inform Congress and await further developments.” In other words, the issue of whether this 13th Amendment was ratified and is, or is not, a legitimate Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, is not merely a historical curiosity — the ratification issue is still alive.

But most importantly, Hartgrove implies that the only remaining argument against the 13th Amendment’s ratification is a procedural error involving the absence of a “certificate of ratification”.

Dodge countered Hartgrove’s procedure argument by citing some of the ratification procedures recorded for other states when the 13th Amendment was being considered. He notes that according to the Journal of the House of Representatives. 11th Congress, 2nd Session, at p. 241, a “letter” (not a “certificate of ratification”) from the Governor of Ohio announcing Ohio’s ratification was submitted not to the Secretary of State but rather to the House of Representatives where it “was read and ordered to lie on the table.” Likewise, “The Kentucky ratification was also returned to the House, while Maryland’s earlier ratification is not listed as having been
returned to Congress.”

The House Journal implies that since Ohio and Kentucky were not required to notify the Secretary of State of their ratification decisions, there was likewise no requirement that Virginia file a “certificate of ratification” with the Secretary of State. Again, despite arguments to the contrary, it appears that the “missing” Amendment was Constitutionally ratified and should not be denied because of some possible procedural error.
QUICK, MEN! TO THE ARCHIVES!

Each of Sen. Mitchell’s and Mr. Hartgrove’s arguments against Ratification have been overcome or badly weakened. Still, some of the evidence supporting ratification is inferential; some of the conclusions are only implied. But it’s no wonder that there’s such an austere sprinkling of hard evidence surrounding this 13th Amendment:

According to The Gazette (5/10/91), the Library of Congress has 349,402 un-catalogued rare books and 13.9 million un-catalogued rare manuscripts. The evidence of ratification seems tantalizingly close but remains buried in those masses of un-catalogued documents, waiting to be found. It will take some luck and some volunteers to uncover the final proof.

We have an Amendment that looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck. But because we have been unable to find the eggshell from which it hatched in 1819, Sen. Mitchell and Mr. Hartgrove insist we can’t … quite … absolutely prove it’s a duck, and therefore, the government is under no obligation to concede it’s a duck. Maybe so. But if we can’t prove it’s a duck, they can’t prove it’s not. If the proof of ratification is not quite conclusive, the evidence against ratification is almost nonexistent, largely a function of the government’s refusal to acknowledge the proof. We are left in the peculiar position of boys facing bullies in the schoolyard. We show them proof that they should again include the “missing” 13th Amendment on the Constitution; they sneer and jeer and
taunt us with cries of “make us”. Perhaps we shall.

It’s worth noting that Rick Donaldson, another researcher, uncovered certified copies of the 1865 and 1867 editions of the Colorado Civil Codes which also contain the missing Amendment. Although these editions were stored in the Colorado state archive, their existence was previously un-catalogued and unknown to the Colorado archivists.

This raises a fantastic possibility. If there’s insufficient evidence that Virginia did ratify in 1819, there is no evidence that Virginia did not. Therefore, since there was no time limit specified when the Amendment was proposed, and since the government clearly believed only Virginia’s vote remained to be counted in the ratification issue, the current state legislature of Virginia could theoretically vote to ratify the Amendment, send the necessary certificates to Washington, and thereby add the Amendment to the Constitution.

Was it ratified? There is a lot of evidence that it was. Could all of the following publications have been in error?

The following states and/or territories have published the Titles of Nobility amendment in their official publications as a ratified amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

Colorado1861, 1862, 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867, 1868
Connecticut1821, 1824, 1835, 1839
[?] Dakota1862, 1863, 1867
Florida1823, 1825, 1838
Georgia1819, 1822, 1837, 1846
Illinois1823, 1825, 1827, 1833, 1839, dis. 1845
Indiana1824, 1831, 1838
Iowa1839, 1842, 1843
Kansas1855, 1861, 1862, 1868
Kentucky1822
Louisiana1825, 1838/1838 [two separate publications]
Maine1825, 1831
Massachusetts1823
Michigan1827, 1833
Mississippi1823, 1824, 1839
Missouri1825, 1835, 1840, 1841, 1845*
Nebraska1855, 1856, 1857, 1858, 1859, 1860, 1861, 1862, 1873
North Carolina1819, 1828
Northwestern Territories1833
Ohio1819, 1824, 1831, 1833, 1835, 1848
Pennsylvania1818, 1824, 1831
Rhode Island1822
Virginia1819
Wyoming1869, 1876

Totals:24 States in 78 separate official government publications.Note: “Pimsleur’s”, a checklist of legal publications, does not list many of the above volumes.

* This volume was published twice in 1845. The first published the “Titles of Nobility” amendment, the second was published right after Congress set the requirements for Missouri’s admission as a State. The “Titles of Nobility” amendment was replaced with a notation that this amendment was printed in error in 1835.

ADDITIONAL PUBLICATIONS:

“The History of the World”
Samuel Maunder, Harper, New York, 1850, vol. 2, p.462. Republished by
Wm. Burtis, Baltimore, 1856, vol. 2, p.462.
“The Rights of an American Citizen”
Benj. Oliver, Counsellor at Law, Boston, 1832, p. 89.
“Laws of the United States of America”
Bioren and Duane, Philadelphia & Washington, 1815, vol. 1, p.74. [See:
Note]
“The American Politician”
M. Sears, Boston, 1842, p.27.
“Constitution of the United States”
C.A. Cummings, Lynn, Massachusetts, not dated, p.35.
Political Text Book Containing the Declaration of Independence”
Edward Currier, Blake, Holliston, Mass. 1841, p.129.
“Brief Exposition of the Constitution of the United States for the use
of Common Schools”
John S. Hart, A.M. (Principal of Philadelphia High School and Professor
of Moral Mental and Political Science), Butler and Co., Philadelphia,
1850, p.100.
“Potter’s Justice”
H. Potter, U.S. District Court Judge, Raleigh, North Carolina, 1828,
p.404, 2nd Edition [the 1st Ed., 1816, does not have “Titles of
Nobility”].

Note: The “Laws of the United States” was published by John Duane. Without doubt, Duane was aware of Virginia’s plan to ratify this amendment which targeted, amongst other things, the emolument of banking and the agents of foreign banking interests, the attorneys. Currency manipulation led to the failure of numerous banks and in turn to many a personal bankruptcy, including that of Thomas Jefferson. The allegiance of attorneys** has always been with the money state, whether pharaoh, caesar, monarch or
corporate monopoly.

** See: “Acts of Virginia”, Feb. 20, 1812, p.143.
The Court, in “Horst v. Moses”, 48 Alabama 129, 142 (1872) gave the following description of a title of nobility:

To confer a title of nobility, is to nominate to an order of persons to whom privileges are granted at the expense of the rest of the people. It is not necessarily hereditary, and the objection to it rises more from the privileges supposed to be attached than to the otherwise empty title or order. These components are forbidden separately in the terms “privilege”, “honor”, and “emoluments”, as they are collectively in the term “title of nobility”. The prohibition is not affected by any consideration paid or rendered for the grant.

“Bouvier’s Law Dictionary”, 15th Edition, vol. 1 (1885) lists the due process amendments as 5 and 15 [15 was re-numbered to 14] on p.571. The prohibition of titles of nobility stops the claim of eminent domain through fictions of law. Eminent domain is the legal euphemism for expropriation, and unreasonable seizure given sanction by the targets of this amendment.

The debate goes on. The mystery continues to unfold. The answer lies buried in the archives. If you are close to a state archive or large library anywhere in the USA, please search for editions of the U.S. Constitution printed between 1819 and 1870.

If you will, please check your state’s archives and libraries to review any copies of the Constitution printed prior to the Civil War, or any books containing prints of the Constitution before 1870. If you locate anything related to this project we would appreciate hearing from you so we may properly fulfill this effort of research.

If you find more evidence of the “missing” 13th Amendment please contact:

David Dodge
POB 985
Taos, New Mexico, 87571
This version of this research text by David Dodge was edited for clarity, and hand-coded in HTML on July 4, A.D. 2002, by The Lawful Path, http://www.lawfulpath.com/, and was adapted from a prior version placed on the web by Barefoot Bob, May 5, 1996.

http://sicknesshope.com/node/1887

The Privy Council is in Control

Douglas Gabriel and Michael McKibben update patriots with the latest intel on the British involvement in the overthrow of of Donald Trump. Make sure to educate and enlighten your audience on WHO the enemy is (sources) and HOW they operate (methods). High level stuff here.

The Privy Council is in Control

The articles and posts below contain documents to which Michael and Douglas referred in the audio above:

Five Eyes and the Global Spy Racketeers

Stefan Halper Payment Shows Ties to DoD and Atlantic Council

Italian Government Compromised in Russiagate

Miner Finds

Unmasking the Five Eyes Beast

1945 Meeting Organized Five Eyes

Assassination Cover-Up Exposed

And, yes, Douglas had something to do with Star Wars…and also Indiana Jones.

Source of the Force: Secret Behind Star Wars Inspiration

The Enduring Legacy of Hans Solo and Indiana Jones

 

 

EXPOSED: One Hundred Years of Deadly Propaganda Wars

Patriots of the American Intelligence Media have learned that the British have been running a 100-year propaganda war on the world. It is part of their 200-year plan to dominate and control the world under a New World Order.

If you don’t know anything about these propaganda wars, then read our post here:

Patriots Expose the 100-Year Anglo-American Propaganda War That Has Terrorized the World with War, Strife, and Poverty

Knowing TRUTH HISTORY is very important in understanding how fake news media and false flags that have stoked the fires of war and terror for over a century. After reading the article link above, we recommend that you continue your citizen education by watching these excellent video presentations by the Corbett Report.

Notice that below the videos, we have a timeline of treachery chart that explains why we have endless wars since 1914.

The WWI Conspiracy – Part One: To Start A War

The WWI Conspiracy – Part Two: The American Front

The WWI Conspiracy – Part Three: A New World Order

For those interested in some question-answers about this series from James Corbett, see: WWI Q&A – Questions For Corbett

.

Want to know where we are going on our journey of WORLD HISTORY TRUTH? Just follow our connections from the theft of social media to the beginning of the modern propaganda war begun by the BRITISH ELITES in 1914.

Our truth journey is takes us to the British monarchy and along the way we will be snagging a pope or two.

Hold on! The redpilling action is going to be wrenching for the fake news media and globalist puppets.

timeline of british treachery updated 1timeline of british treachery updated 2timeline of british treachery updated 3timeline of british treachery updated 4

timeline of british treachery updated 5
#the-original-wwi-false-flags | https://tinyurl.com/y9mgqb49

 

.

 

 

How Music Brought Down the Iron Curtain

Think you know everything there is to know about the man who invented social media?

Sorry, to redpill you. It wasn’t Dude Zuckerberg.

Here is story of how a young man – who would later invent the ‘engine’ of social media – and a group of musician friends brought down the Iron Curtain of Communism.

How Michael McKibben Brought Down the Iron Curtain Through Music

To view Michael’s original video see below:

 

Learn more about the Singing Revolution in the Baltics. Scroll down to Fig. 15 for details.

The true story of social networking

To read and see the videos about the amazing story of how Michael McKibben and Leader Technologies invented social media, only to have it stolen from corrupt lawyers and Senior Executive Service operatives, the Serco-run U. S. Patent Office and Silicon Valley Boy Kings.

Betsy wonders, “When is somebody going to make a movie about this amazing modern day Forest Gump – Michael McKibben.”

Facebook Unmasked: How the World’s Most Relevant Entrepreneur Was Screwed By Zuckerberg

 

A history lesson for Americans. You’re still British.

The book The Great American Adventure – Secrets of America was recently posted on Truth News Headlines and the Anonymous Patriots did not want it to go unnoticed because it provides a panoramic view of British-American relations throughout history that is quite instructive if you are studying Serco, Crown Agents, Urenco and other British corporations that own major parts of the U. S. economy.

Without the historical perspective, it is hard to imagine how such a comprehensive overthrow of American wealth has been accomplished.

Judge Dale, author of the book summarized and abbreviated below, has some very strong ideas that we found might be a bit harsh for ears that are only hearing these truths for the first time. We have not changed any of Judge Dale’s ideas in our presentation, but we have been selective in the content. We wanted to say many of the same things as Judge Dale, but thought it appropriate to give him the full credit. We hope that you will enjoy this foundational work as an overview to some facts that are often assumed to be conspiracies but are quite true.

You might also enjoy listening to Betsy and Thomas discuss this topic in their video:

A little history lesson for Americans. You’re still British.

.

Extracts from: The Great American Adventure – Secrets of America

Political history of government and law by Judge Dale (retired)

The Colonization of America continued to expand while King George grew deeper in debt to the Rothschild Bank. It was Mayer Amschel Bauer (Rothschild), a Jew and the founder of the Rothschild Banking Empire, who suggested to King George that he tax the American colonies and demand his payment in gold. Since he was thoroughly in debt to the Rothschild Bank, King George subsequently decided to tax all commerce entering or exiting the Americas and he demanded his payment in gold. His first tax was on tea.

The colonists did not trade in gold but had developed a system of exchange based upon promissory notes called “Colonial Script,” which is similar to the “Federal Reserve Notes” of today. The difference between Colonial Script and Federal Reserve Notes is: “Consent.” The colonists consented to establish and honor the Colonial Script as a fair medium of exchange and which bore no interest charges; whereas, Federal Reserve Notes were thrust upon Americans without our consent, with interest and the intent of stealing the fruits of American labor, equity and assets.

The King’s demand for gold is what instigated the Boston Tea Party and not the historic claim of ‘Taxation without Representation.’ The Colonists were actually willing to pay King George’s tea tax, providing he would accept his payment in Colonial Script, which he could then trade back to them for tobacco and hemp products, and he refused. In response to the Boston Tea Party, King George sent his military in force to intimidate the colonists. This resulted in an armed confrontation and many skirmishes, which was later billed and classified as the Revolutionary War.

The fifty-one colonists who are counted as being the “Founding Fathers,” prepared and served a declaration upon King George, declaring America’s independence from England under the name of “The United States of America,” which did not set well with the King. In fact, it outraged him. The Colonists learned to fight guerrilla style warfare from fighting with and against the various Indian tribes and subsequently won many of these revolutionary skirmishes but they never had a prayer of winning a war and besides, King George never intended to kill off the colonists because: Who then would pay his tax? All he was attempting to do was regain control over his deposed slaves and any new slaves who had joined forces with the colonists.

Another historic fact that has been concealed from our history is that the first and foremost crop to be grown in America was “hemp” or “marijuana.” Each of the Founding Fathers owned large hemp plantations. The colonists made rope, flags, homespun clothing, sails, writing paper and medicine from the processed hemp and the sterilized seed was used in baking, called sesame seeds. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are actually written on hemp paper.

The introduction of tobacco eventually changed the score because tobacco was so naturally addictive that England couldn’t get enough of it and purchased all the colonists could grow. Tobacco sold for more money than hemp however hemp had more practical uses. Many colonial farmers split their land into two: half hemp and half tobacco, whereas others changed over to all tobacco. All of the colonists grew corn, potatoes, squash, apples, cabbage and raised chickens, beef and dairy cattle, and sheep but that was for their own personal consumption and not for export.

England had just defeated Napoleon and the English soldiers were battle weary. Most of the English soldiers refused to fight the American colonists because so many of the colonists were their relatives. So, Mr. Bauer (Rothschild) traveled to Prussia and engaged the services of unemployed Hessian Mercenaries for the career English officers to command. The Hessian soldiers had just finished fighting the Seven Years War and there was little need or employment for career soldiers. Their contract pay with Bauer was for fifty cents a day and Mr. Bauer billed the King for one dollar a day. Since King George had a revolving charge with the Rothschild Bank, repayment for these soldiers would eventually be required of him in gold.

Upon defeating the French, a second suggestion was presented to King George by Mr. Bauer, which was for the King to arrange through his newly appointed Civilian Administrator of France, to offer the Continental Congress a loan and appropriations to supply and finance the Revolutionary War. George’s plan and logic was simple: ‘To bring America to its knees in debt and then foreclose on it.’ Unfortunately, colonial America didn’t have a prayer of winning and most of the money and appropriations loaned or sold to them went into the pockets of the members of the Founding Fathers.

King George now controlled England, Ireland and France and ruled over roughly 60 million subjects. He also possessed the largest and most efficient military force known at that time, which was the combined army and navy of France and England. The American colony known as “The Virginia Colony,” was populated by three million men, women and children in total and most of the men were farmers and tradesmen or bond slaves, armed only with knives and flintlock muskets. So, it is beyond imagination that anyone could possibly believe that the American colonists ever won or possessed a chance of winning the Revolutionary War or the War of 1812. But then: ‘If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will begin to believe you.’

Nobody won the Revolutionary War, but since the English military was first to stop fighting, the Continental Congress declared that America won the war, based upon an old maxim of law, which reads: “He who leaves the field of battle first …. loses.” Twenty members of the Continental Congress were formerly Founding Fathers and were once English lawyers and aristocrats who had received considerable training in the art of English Law. This situation however posed a new problem for the Continental Congress to resolve, which was ‘How to place their debt to France on the backs of the American colonists?’

They decided to tax all alcoholic beverages, which was the impetus that started the American moonshine business and rum smuggling trade. One of the largest rum smugglers in America was Founding Father, John Hancock. Mr. Bauer also had an ulterior motive apart from collecting the Kings debt to his bank in gold. Bauer viewed the American colonies as an untapped resource and a prime location to establish another branch of his Rothschild Bank.

His plan was simple: ‘To establish a branch of his banking empire in the colonies, replace the colonial script with his corporate bank script, and then extend unlimited credit to the colonists with a repayment in gold.’ It worked on King George so why shouldn’t it work in the American Colonies?

Bauer also changed his last name to Rothschild around this timeframe. Rothschild, however, was unsuccessful in accomplishing his plan for the American colony because the Continental Congress rejected his proposal based in part on a business plan they were drafting or modifying that was designed to insure and protect their individual interests titled: “The Constitution of the United States of America,” which was a modified version of the Iroquois Federation Government Constitution.

The Articles of Confederation was the outline for the Constitution and it spelled out their business plan to control America.

The colonists were never asked if they wanted a Constitution nor were they asked to vote on this document because the Continental Congress had always intended to steal North America for their own personal posterity. The safeguards found in the Constitution were not for our protection but were actually intended to prevent any one or group of Founding Fathers from cutting the others out. While Mr. Rothschild openly condemned the use of “colonial script” as money by calling it worthless, his agents and employees who had secretly infiltrated the American colonies were instructed to buy up or trade for all available “script” that they could lay their hands on.

While this was going on, Rothschild sent his top banking agent in Europe to further infiltrate the new American government, a man by the name of Alexander Levine. Once in America, Mr. Levine changed his last name to Hamilton, to obscure his Jewish ancestry and conceal any connection as the CFO of the Rothschild Banking Empire.

Alexander Hamilton secured employment as the personal secretary to General George Washington and after Washington’s election to the office of president, Alexander Hamilton was appointed by President Washington as the first United States Secretary of the Treasury. Alexander Hamilton, however, always remained loyal to the Rothschild family and the Rothschild Bank and as the first United States Secretary of the Treasury, he manipulated the value of the colonial script that the Rothschild agents had accumulated and drafted and proposed a charter for the first United States Central Bank with a twenty-year contract.

President George Washington signed the Central Bank Charter into law and therein successfully entered the Rothschild banking empire into American commerce, by the stroke of a pen.

Our public education in American history taught us to laud Alexander Hamilton as a great American hero and patriot, when all along he was just another one of the many traitors to America who helped to undermine the Republic and the new American government. When the Founding Fathers rejected the Rothschild’s request for another twenty-year charter (in a fit of rage and with King Georges help), Nathan Rothschild, who was in charge of the London Branch, provoked and personally financed the entire cost of The War of 1812.

During the War of 1812, King George deduced that if he destroyed the American symbol of government and eliminated specific signers of the Declaration of Independence, whom he deemed to be the trouble makers (called patriots and loyalists) and burned the actual “Declaration of Independence”; that those acts of force and violence should take the fight out of the American colonists and they would succumb to he and Nathan Rothschild’s plans. Thirty of the fifty-one signers of the Declaration of Independence were loyal Americans and the other twenty-one were traitors and were secretly loyal to King George.

After the White House in Philadelphia was burned and specific American Loyalists, their entire families and relatives were murdered and burned in their homes, the fighting stopped. The colonists returned to their trades and the English military took up quarters in New Amsterdam (now New York) for the next eight years before returning to England and the Continental Congress once again declared America the victors. In the Treaty of Paris was the concession that King George’s son, Prince William, is the Sovereign Ruler of America.

George Washington, the first American President and the epitomized ‘Father of this Country’ had his own plan in mind: to be anointed, “King of America.” After his election, George overthrew the original Constitution for the United States of America under the Articles of Confederation and reinstated The Virginia Colony Corporation and thereafter eliminated the first Constitutional civilian government on April 30, 1789. George had a law background and relied upon the Articles of Confederation to perform his plot and then he immediately took office one year before the original Constitution would have lawfully permitted him to do so.

Few American’s understand the kind of man George Washington really was. George is a hero in the eyes of the corporate State and Federal Government politicians but he was actually an opportunist and a traitor to America. George’s first official presidential act was to install a corporate military government to replace the expected constitutional civilian government, which just happens to be the same one that exists to date.

President Washington’s military government is intentionally hidden in plain sight, which is evidenced by the military terms utilized to describe those designated offices, [e.g.] Commander in Chief, Attorney General, Auditor General, Secretary General, Postmaster General, Surgeon General, etc. Every federal agency is supervised by a military general who reports to the Commander and Chief.

We Americans have been indoctrinated through expert programming, conditioning, prejudice and patriotism, to treat information like this as being ridiculous, absurd and untrue. Our government has eliminated the family farms and local stores; placed us into cities; gave our industry away; issued valueless currency and stole our gold and silver; raised taxes and stole their paper currency back; involved us in staged wars; began a mass foreclosure of American homes and poisoned our air and public water.

George Washington and the Continental Congress all feared that their treasonous conduct would become public knowledge and their reprisal swift and certain, so they concealed these facts by hiring authors to write and publish a different account of historical facts.

Civil War

Abraham Lincoln being the absolute liberal that he was attempted to do everything within his power to avoid a Civil War. The published version of American history doesn’t reflect the fact that Lincoln had offered to compromise his stand on slavery. His proposal was that: “One seventh of the slave population would be freed each year during the following seven years.”

There were forces unknown to him who were instigating a Civil War and who were ready to blame Lincoln and the slave question. These forces also convinced the southern States to succeed from the Union, which was certain to destroy the foundation of the American government and so a Civil War was imminent. The succession of the southern States from the Union technically destroyed the United States Congress because a quorum could never be convened, so all Acts by the Congress during the Civil War were never lawful. Lincoln attempted to cure this problem of the absence of a quorum by declaring that: “America was at war.” He supported his actions based upon the War Powers Clause found within the unenforceable, original Constitution of the United States of America.

To his credit, Lincoln was the first president who intended to sever the European royal and Rothschild factions control over the United States, which like President John Kennedy, resulted in both of their deaths. The High Contracting Powers (European Royals and Elite) preferred a war to a peace because war stimulated commerce and they all stood in a position to profit from every service generated by and within commerce, especially during a war. While the war carried on, it would act as a diversion to their subterfuge.

At the start of the Civil War, Lincoln attempted to secure financing for the North from the Central Bank of America, named the United States Bank (which belonged to the Rothschild Banking Empire). The Central Bank demanded a high interest, a lien on the government treasury, and repayment of the loan in gold. Lincoln was so outraged by these terms and the lack of sentiment and patriotism that he promised when the war was over, his first act will be to: “Drive the Central Bank out of America,” and the verbiage used in Lincoln’s “Gettysburg Address” would redefine his desire and intent to break the corrupt ties of the European Royals and Elite that controlled and bound America. It was his stated threat about the Central Bank and his Gettysburg Address that caused Lincoln’s assassination and not his stand on slavery.

Threats leveled against America’s banks will continue to be the impetus for many future murders. During the American Civil War, the Confiscation Act of 1861 was adopted. This was an Act between the military governments representing the North and the South and was defined by those governmental bodies to be the ‘Rules of engagement and military protocol,’ concerning how those governments and their military will deal with American citizens during time of war. The words “time of war” will become a key in years to come with the passage of the Lieber Code and the Trading with the Enemy Act.

The Confiscation Act specified that anyone who fought against the government of the North would automatically lose his property but non-combatants who had suffered such property loss or confiscation would subsequently be entitled to lawful compensation.

In 1863, The Lieber Code was adopted as well as General Order No.100, signed by President Abraham Lincoln. This Code is similar in nature to The Confiscation Act and The Geneva Convention and better defined how Union soldiers shall conduct themselves in time of war and specified that any military officer, who violated this Code, shall be treated as a belligerent. This became another key word then and in the future because a “belligerent” shall come to be treated as a combatant and as such, subject to the Confiscation Act and the loss of his liberty and all he owns. This is exactly what happens to defendants in America’s Courts of Justice or rather America’s Military Courts.

In 1864, The Virginia Colony, (America’s corporate military government) under the guise of The United States of America, entered into an International Treaty titled The Geneva Convention. International Treaties are recognized by all of the World’s governments and therefore carry more force and affect in law than any constitution or individual contracts called statutes. The crux of this particular International Treaty specifically prohibited any and all military intervention and or the operation of any Military Courts of Justice over the civilian population of any conquered nation.

By entering into this Treaty as The United States of America, the Treaty became null and void due to fraud because America was actually operating under the corporation titled The Virginia Colony. Factually, Americans are a conquered people; conquered by the European Royals and Elite and by their own federal and state governments, with the stroke of a pen and the expert use of legalese, deception, patriotism, propaganda, fear, and intimidation.

Lincoln’s Declaration of War under the War Powers Clause of Article 1, Clause 8 of the Constitution has yearly and secretly been renewed by Congress and all past presidents but for a different reason. Their renewed Declaration of War specifies that the private corporate US Government is at War with America and its people and defines the American public as, “the enemy of the state.”

The congress, judges and Bar lawyers laugh at Americans who claim protections under the Constitution and they label them ‘Constitutionalists.’

On December 6, 1865, The Congress of The Virginia Colony (America’s corporate military government) secretly rewrote the original Constitution of the United States of America which disposed of the original 13th amendment and then replaced it with the 14th. The original 13th amendment prohibited lawyers from ever holding a seat in government.

The 14th amendment followed on the heels of the Emancipation Proclamation, which was supposed to free the slaves and define all of our individual rights, which turned out to be another canard. The 14th amendment did just the opposite. In the next rewrite of the Constitution, the 15th, 16th and 17th amendments were added without a Constitutional Convention or public vote and were actually rejected by every State Government of the Republic; however, the Secretary of the Congress ignored the rejection letters and reported to Congress and the media that these amendments had been ratified by a sufficient number of States.

These amendments were intended to give the Federal Government the authority to tax us. Future arguments before the Supreme Court resulted in the high court declaring that the legality of these amendments was a political issue and not a judicial one and they subsequently refused to rule on them.

Despite the fact that these secret rewrites were contrary to any public vote or law, Congress finally adopted the rewritten Constitution in Washington D.C., which became the ‘proprietary law’ for the District of Columbia. Proprietary law carries with it the same force and affect as a City Ordinance and since the District of Columbia is not a recognized State, this Ordinance was only enforceable against the residents of Washington, D.C., also known as: ‘federal foreign citizens; United States citizens’ and ‘14th amendment citizens.’ These ‘words of art’ were created by the 14th amendment with the future intent to entrap us all.

The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments were amendments to the Reconstruction Act and with the passage of the Reconstruction Act, these words of art forced all state governments and state officials into the District of Columbia as extensions of the corporate federal government. This underlying deception created another set of duplicitous governments, which pose as state governments, which are actually federal, with state officials that are actually federal officials.

The residents of Washington, D.C. are actually ‘federal foreign citizens’ because Washington, D.C. is not a state and therefore is alien to the American Republic. Prior to this time, American’s residing within the states were referred to as “Sovereign citizens of the Republic.” The power of the word sovereign comes from the “Declaration of Independence and God.” The corporate government fears the sovereign citizen because corporations and politicians have no power over the source of law and sovereigns are the source of all man-made laws, despite the fact that we are never provided with the opportunity to vote on the passage of any of the governments planned statutes, which were designed to control us. Statutes are written and passed by the congress as though they were a King and Kingdom of America.

Contrary to popular opinion, the 14th amendment did not free anyone but rather enslaved everyone, except for a list of 300 influential families who were granted immunity from the 14th amendment and can be found in the Congressional Record of 1865, which gave them diplomatic immunity. The 14th amendment did not initially make everyone a 14th amendment citizen nor grant any special rights or freedoms. (e.g. ‘The Bill of Rights’) What it succeeded in doing was to make all public officers and people in residence within the District of Columbia, a 14th amendment citizen, aka United States Citizen and Federal Foreign Citizen, and provided for a bounty, enforceable against them for the non-payment of the public debt, which was later coined by Congress as the “national debt.”

The public debt, or national debt, belongs to a private corporation named: the U. S. Federal Reserve. A corporation is a dead-legal fiction. Corporations cannot walk, talk or make decisions. They are defined by a piece of paper in a safe somewhere in Holland called a charter. They have “no soul to save or body to incarcerate.” This bounty could not lawfully be enforced against anyone else because everyone residing within the states was still a “sovereign American citizen of the Republic.” The word sovereign is derived from the Law of Kings; meaning that ‘The source of law is derived from the king and therefore the force of law can never be enforced against its source.’

As sovereign citizens of the Republic, we are the king and source of law and therefore the force of law cannot be enforced against us, except by us and not by any government. This also explains why every law is civil, even the ones defined as criminal are actually civil. Contracts can be enforced against everyone including the king. By the third constitutional rewrite, we all unknowingly became a 14th amendment citizen by our consent and became the collateral property of the Corporate United States Government, which is principally controlled by the Crown of England, the Vatican and the Rothschild banking factions.

Every time you complete a government form or tax return, you are asked to check a box indicating that you are a United States Citizen, meaning a 14th amendment citizen, under penalty of perjury. You should be checking the box that reads: “Alien of the United States” instead because we are not residents of Washington, D.C. or the Territory of Puerto Rico, Guam or Samoa. Unless employed by the government, we all are alien to the federal government and not their corporate property.

Reconstruction

The Reconstruction Act of 1868 establishes the power and authority of the military to supersede all power or authority of all state, county, and city governments, which are now a part of the federal government and all law enforcement personnel is subordinate to the president and the generals in charge of the federal government and therefore the power and authority of the federal government becomes an absolute by this Act.

All this means is that the government now has the right to tell you how to live your life whereas, before this Act, “We the People” controlled the government. This explains how an FBI agent can take an investigation away from a local police department. All states and state officials are sub-federal and are subordinate to the federal government when we at one time use to control the state and federal government as a Republic. Any and all who refuse, will be treated as belligerents and subject to the Confiscation Act. Most people who have a local, county or state job do not realize that they are all federal employees pursuant to the Reconstruction Act and the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments.

The bankruptcy of America and the introduction of a new legal system on March 9, 1933 (House Joint Resolution No. 192-10 by the 73rd Congress) was voted into law, which is the Emergency Banking Act. This Act declared the Treasury of the United States ‘Bankrupt’, which is an impossible feat since the U. S. Treasury was secretly closed by the Congress twelve years earlier in 1921. The Emergency Banking Act succeeded in abrogating America’s gold standard and hypothecated all property found within the United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, THE VIRGINIA COLONY CORPORATION and opened a new Government Corporation called THE UNITED STATES, INC.

Federal Reserve Act

“The Federal Reserve Act” was designed and written by a German National who was repatriated into the United States in 1903 through Ellis Island of New York. His name was Paul Warburg, and was a carbon copy of Alexander (Levine) Hamilton. Mr. Warburg was a German Jewish banker and CFO of a Rothschild Bank. Mr. Warburg’s assignment was to craft a piece of legislation designed to control the finances of the United States Corporation from Europe. The Federal Reserve Act is approximately 1500 pages and places the currency and finance for the United States Corporation under a private corporation called, “The U. S. Federal Reserve.” The Federal Reserve is owned by the Rothschild Banking Empire (and their friends) and not by the American people or the corporate government of the United States.

The Great Depression of 1929, like so many other catastrophes before and after this date was actually a staged event, concocted by the Rothschild and Rockefeller banking empires, the British Crown and Parliament, the US President and Congress, the Vatican and numerous elite families to steal America’s gold and silver reserves and replace it with, “Negotiable Debt Instruments” or script money. Their theft was ingenious and by allowing the public to fall on hard times, the public soon began to demand that the government fix the problem by any means necessary. While everyone struggled in America to survive, President Roosevelt and the Congress were making interest bearing loans to foreign governments, using the very money they publicly swore did not exist. Germany used that money to enlarge their war chest.

Prior to 1933, we all were proud and peaceful sovereign inhabitants of America. The Trading with the Enemy Act, the Confiscation Act and the Lieber Code obligated the military government to, ‘peacefully interact with American citizens’ and prohibited them from ‘provoking us or to act belligerently toward us’ or they forfeit their ability to profit and loot or to securitize our property, equity, and credit being held in a public trust.

Under Regulation 840-10 of the Military Code and sections of the Administrative Procedures Act and the presence of that Military (gold fringed) Flag on display in the courtroom, instantly creates a state of emergency; meaning that, the moment a police officer stopped you in the exercise of your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the police officer became a belligerent. He is armed and you’re not! He displays a military rank and you’re a civilian and he has now delivered you into a Military Court of justice with the intent to ‘pillage and plunder’ within the Admiralty jurisdiction of that Military Court, which is also known as ‘The Law of Prize and Captured Property,’ as defined under Title 10, sections 7651 to 7681 of the Code of Military Justice, March 25, 1862.

Public Trusts are not a new concept, it was copied from the ancient Roman Empire and their use of Roman Trusts. The ancient Roman Trusts declared that everyone had died after Rome was burned (which was a staged event) and until those Roman Citizens served notice upon the Roman Senate that they were in fact alive and capable of managing their own estates, all were presumed dead and the Roman Senate became the trustee over every estate and used them as they deemed appropriate.

In 1933, the corporate government enticed Americans to voluntarily register for birth certificates, social security, driver’s licenses, voter registration, etc. and enticed us with government benefits to do so. Years later, they obligated American’s to register for all of these documents except for voter registration. These so-called government benefits were no bargain because they belonged to all of us to begin with and over time the largest benefits have been watered down. What most Americans don’t realize is that: No corporation can operate or fund itself. Corporations require human beings; their credit and sweat equity to finance and operate them. Therefore, everything that the government claims to own, actually belongs to “We the Public” and not them.

Monetizing the Public Trust Accounts

As previously mentioned, these registration programs were instituted so that the Federal Reserve Banks and the corporate military “Courts of Justice” could securitize and monetize the public trust accounts. Each birth certificate and Social Security card was eventually converted into a trust account and became a government security and is marketed as a mutual fund via debt notes. If you own a piece of a mutual fund investment, you are actually hedging your money against human collateral and work credit.

Every bond or international security is assigned a “CUSIP” number and if you know how to use their formula or have a close friend who is a stock broker, you or he can convert the numbers and letters found on your Social Security Card into its CUSIP number. Armed with those CUSIP numbers, anyone can look up the mutual funds that your life is being collectively marketed under.

Your birth certificate number is handled the same way. Our forced registration of birth actually made us the personal property of the state. Each of us unknowingly gave our children away to the government of the state where they were born when we registered them for a government issued birth certificate, which is how the state government controls child custody. Our children are now the state’s collective property and we are permitted to keep and raise them, providing that we behave ourselves and comply with their corporate laws and regulations. The state obligates us to pay for our children in any way they see fit. It is also the birth certificate that provides the police with the authority to break and enter any house under suspicion of abuse and now the U. S. Patriot Act covers all other situations.

The Fee Simple Deed gave the state your home and the right to tax you into poverty as a tenant and the U. S. Patriot Act eliminated the need for search warrants. You are no longer the king of your castle, which was guaranteed by the Allodial Deed, because you no longer own a castle. Your personal lawyer set that one up too and received a large, one-time secret kickback, from the state government on your first tax bill in addition to the fees you paid to him to represent your best interests. When our deeds were Allodial, no one could trespass on our property, not even the government. No one could tax your property and no bank could foreclose on your property but there again, no bank would ever loan you money against your property either. We were the kings and sovereign rulers of our land and homes, but you now see how the government has been chipping away at your basic rights and freedoms since the American Revolution was fought and not won.

You can buy your freedom for a price of $600,000 dollars through the Department of State, which is the cost of procuring American diplomatic immunity pursuant to International Law. In all other countries this same immunity can be purchased for $95,000.00, which is honored in 90 of the 267 world countries with the exception of: The United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Everything is a game and for enough money, anyone can play and secure their freedom from criminal law, civil lawsuits, taxes and passports because everything in this world is about commerce.

It is through these machinations that Americans are still ruled by the British Crown and its agents to this very day.